Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T22:54:01.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Focus on Everyday Life: a New Turn in Sociology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

Piotr Sztompka
Piotr Sztompka*
Affiliation:
Institute of Sociology, Jagiellonian University, Cracow 31-044, Poland
*
E-mail: ussztomp@cyf-kr.edu.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sociology is currently undergoing an interesting theoretical and methodological turn. A number of recent and influential works of sociology deal with the seemingly trivial phenomena of everyday life. The standard mass surveys are being replaced by in-depth, interpretative, and qualitative procedures that focus on the visual surface of society. They do so by means of observation and its extension – photography. The author believes that this is not a new fashion but rather signals a true paradigmatic shift. For the author, it heralds the emergence of a ‘third’ sociology, after the ‘first sociology’ of social organisms and systems, and the ‘second sociology’ of behaviour and action. The new focus is on social existence manifested by social events of various scales. This sociology of social existence provides a new angle of vision, which promises to advance considerably our understanding of several perennial riddles of human society.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 23 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Simmel, G. (1971) On Individuality and Social Forms, edited by D. Levine (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
2.Simmel, G. (2006) Most i drzwi: wybór esejów(The Bridge and the Door: selected essays) (Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa).Google Scholar
3.Sztompka, P. (2005) Socjologia wizualna: fotografia jako metoda badawcza(Visual Sociology: Photography as a Research Method) (Warszawa: PWN Publishers) (Russian translation Moscow 2007, Logos Publishers).Google Scholar
4.Turner, J. (2002) Face to Face: Toward a Sociological Theory of Interpersonal Behavior (Stanford: Stanford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Collins, R. (2004) Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Alexander, J., Giesen, B. and Mast, J. (2006) Social Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kuhn, T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
8.Dawe, A. (1978) Theories of social action. In: Bottomore, T. and Nisbet, R. (eds) A History of Sociological Analysis (New York: Basic Books), pp. 362–417.Google Scholar
9.Sztompka, P. (1991) Society in Action: The Theory of Social Becoming (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
10.Gouldner, A. (1971) The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
11.Goffman, E. (1963) Behavior in Public Places (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
12.Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual (Garden City: Doubleday).Google Scholar
13.Goffman, E. (1971) Relations in Public (New York: Harper).Google Scholar
14.Goffman, E. (1979) Gender Advertisements (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
15.Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
16.Garfinkel, H. (2002) Ethnomethodology’s Program, edited by Ann Rawls (Boston: Rowman and Littlefield).Google Scholar
17.Berger, P. and Luckman, T. (1967) The Social Construction of Reality (New York: Doubleday Anchor).Google Scholar
18.Schutz, A. (1970) On Phenomenology and Social Relations, edited by H. Wagner (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
19.Baudrillard, J. (1994) Simulacra and Simulation (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
20.Bauman, Z. (1978) Hermeneutics and Social Sciences (London: Hutchinson).Google Scholar
21.Bauman, Z. (1991) Modernity and Ambivalence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
22.Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society (London: Sage).Google Scholar
23.Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
24.Elias, N. (1991) The Society of Individuals (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
25.Dahrendorf, R. (1979) Life Chances (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
26.Merton, R. (1996) Socially expected durations. In: Sztompka, P. (ed.) On Social Structure and Science (Chicago: Chicago University Press), pp. 162–172.Google Scholar
27.Archer, M. (2000) Being Human: The Problem of Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Le Bon, G. (1994) Psychologia tłumu(Crowd Psychology) (Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna).Google Scholar
29.Marrett, R. (1914) The Threshold of Religion (London: Methuen).Google Scholar
30.Bennett, T. and Watson, D. (eds) (2002) Understanding Everyday Life (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
31. M. Maffesoli (ed.) (1989) The Sociology of Everyday Life, Vol. 37, No.1, Current Sociology (London: Sage).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Goffman, E. (1997) The Goffman Reader, edited by C. Lemert and A. Branaman (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar