Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-wh2kg Total loading time: 0.421 Render date: 2022-06-27T00:11:23.954Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

University Rankings: Quality, Size and Permanence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2020

Adrian Bejan
Affiliation:
Duke University, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Durham, NC27708-0300, USA. Email: abejan@duke.edu
Umit Gunes
Affiliation:
Duke University, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Durham, NC27708-0300, USA. Email: abejan@duke.edu Yildiz Technical University, Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Besiktas, Istanbul34349, Turkey
Bahri Sahin
Affiliation:
Yildiz Technical University, Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Besiktas, Istanbul34349, Turkey

Abstract

Why are the rankings of universities not changing? Why is the demographic composition of top universities the same? In this review, these questions are addressed based on physics. Although size matters, higher ranks do not correlate with bigger sizes. The higher ranks belong to universities that have more authors who receive more citations. Citations are a record of how ideas spread from the source to the whole globe, in accordance with the physics of the logistics S-curve phenomenon. The spreading occurs in three periods – slow, fast, slow – and the population served by each idea during its lifetime depends on the size of the first big channel that carries the idea. An idea from a famous university has a larger spreading territory around it than an idea from a lesser-known university. Creativity is key: rankings come from visibility through citations, and, in turn, visibility for an author is aided by the higher visibility of the university. The demographic composition of the top universities is the same: for instance, the percentage of female authors and authors of East Asian origin among the 200 most cited authors does not vary significantly over the 20 highest ranked universities.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachta, A, Dhombres, J and Kremer-Marietti, A (2008) Trois études sur la loi constructale d’Adrian Bejan. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Barron, GRS (2017) The Berlin principles on ranking higher education institutions: limitations, legitimacy, and value conflict. Higher Education 73 (2), 317333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0022-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basak, T (2011) The law of life: the bridge between physics and biology. Physics of Life Reviews 8(3), 249252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejan, A (2020) Freedom and Evolution: Hierarchy in Nature Society and Science. Switzerland: Springer Nature, p. 139.Google Scholar
Bejan, A and Errera, MR (2017) Wealth inequality: the physics basis. Journal of Applied Physics 121(12), 124903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4977962 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejan, A and Lorente, S (2011) The constructal law origin of the logistics S curve. Journal of Applied Physics 110(2), 024901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3606555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejan, A and Lorente, S (2012) The physics of spreading ideas. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 55(4), 802807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.10.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejan, A, Chen, R, Lorente, S and Wen, CY (2017) Hierarchy in air travel: few large and many small. Journal of Applied Physics 122(2), 024904. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4993580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejan, A, Lorente, S and Lee, J (2008) Unifying constructal theory of tree roots, canopies and forests. Journal of Theoretical Biology 254(3), 529540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.06.026 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bejan, A, Lorente, S, Miguel, AF and Reis, AH (2006) Constructal theory of distribution of city sizes, section 13.4. In Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics (3rd edn). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
Blosser, E (2017) The wrong path to gender diversity. Prism (72), May. Retrieved from www.asee-prism.org/last-word-sum-3/ Google Scholar
Bougnol, ML and Dulá, JH (2015) Technical pitfalls in university rankings. Higher Education 69(5), 859866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9809-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casper, G (2018) Governing for creativity. European Review 26(S1), S85S90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798717000564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y (2011) Maximum profit configurations of commercial engines. Entropy 13(6), 11371151. https://doi.org/10.3390/e13061137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, FL and Park, GS (2016) Ranking and the multiplication of reputation: reflections from the frontier of globalizing higher education. Higher Education 72(1), 115129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9941-3 Google Scholar
D’haen, T (2018) Why universities better invest in the humanities. European Review 26(2), 395405. https://doi.org/10.1017/S106279871700076X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, AH (2017) Does biology explain why men outnumber women in tech? The Conversation, 15 August. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/does-biology-explain-why-men-outnumber-women-in-tech-82479 Google Scholar
Ellinas, C, Allan, N and Johansson, A (2017) Dynamics of organizational culture: individual beliefs vs. social conformity. PLoS One 12(6), e0180193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180193 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feyerabend, P (1978) Against Method. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
Fiscutean, A (2017) Women in Tech: Why Bulgaria and Romania are Leading in Software Engineering, June 13. Retrieved from www.zdnet.com/article/women-in-tech-why-bulgaria-and-romania-are-leading-in-software-engineering/ Google Scholar
Fruin, JJ (1971) Pedestrian Planning and Design. New York: Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners.Google Scholar
Golosovsky, M (2017) Power-law citation distributions are not scale-free. ArXiv: 1708.01859v1 [Physics. Soc-Ph] (3). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.032306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Google Scholar (2017) Google Scholar, 30 May. Retrieved 22 November 2017, from https://scholar.google.com/ Google Scholar
Groof, JD (2018) On the ‘innovative university’. A few challenging reflections. European Review 26(S1), S114S123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S106279871700059X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartocollis, A and Saul, S (2017) Affirmative action battle has a new focus: Asian-Americans. The New York Times, 8 February. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2017/08/02/us/affirmative-action-battle-has-a-new-focus-asian-americans.html Google Scholar
Hasse, C (2002) Gender diversity in play with physics: the problem of premises for participation in activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity 9(4), 250269. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0904_02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, JM, Parrondo, JMR and Sagawa, T (2015) Thermodynamics of information. Nature Physics 11(2), 131139. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3230 Google Scholar
Isaac, H (2017) Towards the platformization of universities. Paris Innovation Review, 9 August.Google Scholar
Jolles, JW, Booger, NJ, Sridhar, VH, Couzin, ID and Manica, A (2017) Consistent individual differences drive collective behavior and group functioning of schooling fish. Current Biology: CB 27(18), 28622868.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalason, P (2007a) Epistémologie constructale du lien cultuel: Les rites: manipulation ou médiation? Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Kalason, P (2007b) Le grimoire des rois: Théorie constructale du changement. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Kármán, TV and Edson, L (1967) The Wind and Beyond. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Klosik, DF and Bornholdt, S (2014) The citation wake of publications detects Nobel Laureates’ papers. PLoS One 9(12), e113184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113184 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krücken, G, Engwall, L and De Corte, E (2018) Introduction to the special issue on ‘university governance and creativity’. European Review 26(S1), S1S5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798717000485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leahey, E (2018) The perks and perils of interdisciplinary research. European Review 26, 113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798718000261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J and Chow, WK (2000) Numerical Studies on Evacuation Pattern in a Lecture Hall 10(3), 265276.Google Scholar
Lorenzini, G and Biserni, C (2011) The constructal law: from design in nature to social dynamics and wealth as physics. Physics of Life Reviews 8(3), 259260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.08.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lui, CH, Kong, FN, Lorente, S, Bejan, A and Chow, WK (2012) Constructal design for pedestrian movement in living spaces: evacuation configurations. Journal of Applied Physics 111(5), 054903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3689771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, RP and Helbing, D (2017) Optimal incentives for collective intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(20), 50775082. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618722114 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miguel, AF (2011) The physics principle of the generation of flow configuration. Physics of Life Reviews 8(3), 243244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.07.006 Google ScholarPubMed
Moussaïd, M, Helbing, D and Theraulaz, G (2011) How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(17), 68846888. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016507108 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NSF – Rankings by Total R&D Expenditures (2016) Retrieved 20 February 2018, from https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/profiles/site?method=rankingBySource&ds=herd Google Scholar
Ohly, S (2018) Promoting creativity at work – implications for scientific creativity. European Review 26(S1), S91S99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798717000576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, SE (2007) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pauls, J (1984) The movement of people in buildings and design solutions for means of egress. Fire Technology 20(1), 2747. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrault, E (2015) Why does board gender diversity matter and how do we get there? The role of shareholder activism in deinstitutionalizing old boys’ networks. Journal of Business Ethics 128(1), 149165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2092-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, AH (2011) Design in nature, and the laws of physics. Physics of Life Reviews 8(3), 255256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.07.001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saslow, WM (1999) An economic analogy to thermodynamics. American Journal of Physics 67(12), 12391247. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, P (2018) Compliance and creativity: dilemmas for university governance. European Review 26(S1), S35S47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798717000527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smerlak, M (2016) Thermodynamics of inequalities: from precariousness to economic stratification. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 441, 4050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staci, Z (2017) Vault 100 rankings: the most prestigious law firms in America (2018). Above the Law, 21 June.Google Scholar
Stolz, I, Hendel, DD and Horn, AS (2010) Ranking of rankings: benchmarking twenty-five higher education ranking systems in Europe. Higher Education 60(5), 507528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9312-z Google Scholar
Temple, H (2014) Théorie générale de la nation: L’architecture du monde. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
The Best Colleges in America (2018) Retrieved 20 February 2018, from www.usnews.com/best-colleges Google Scholar
Thompson, PA and Marchant, EW (1995) A computer model for the evacuation of large building populations. Fire Safety Journal 24(2), 131148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(95)00019-P Google Scholar
Tien, CL (1994) America’s scapegoats. Newsweek (19). Retrieved from www.berkeley.edu/news/berkeleyan/1994/1109/tien.html Google Scholar
Wang, L (2011) Universality of design and its evolution. Physics of Life Reviews 8(3), 257258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.08.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisbuch, G (2013) Sustainable development and spatial inhomogeneities. Journal of Statistical Physics 151(3), 475493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-012-0639-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisbuch, G and Battiston, S (2007) From production networks to geographical economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 64(3–4), 448469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winiwarter, V (2018) The other kind of research: on the ambivalent ties between disciplinary, multi-, inter- and transdisciplinary scholarship. European Review 26, 114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798718000303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, L, Wang, D and Evans, JA (2017) Large teams have developed science and technology; small teams have disrupted it. ArXiv:1709.02445 [Physics]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.02445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

University Rankings: Quality, Size and Permanence
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

University Rankings: Quality, Size and Permanence
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

University Rankings: Quality, Size and Permanence
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *