Skip to main content
×
×
Home

‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system

  • Marilyn Strathern
Abstract

This paper gives an anthropological comment on what has been called the ‘audit explosion’, the proliferation of procedures for evaluating performance. In higher education the subject of audit (in this sense) is not so much the education of the students as the institutional provision for their education. British universities, as institutions, are increasingly subject to national scrutiny for teaching, research and administrative competence. In the wake of this scrutiny comes a new cultural apparatus of expectations and technologies. While the metaphor of financial auditing points to the important values of accountability, audit does more than monitor—it has a life of its own that jeopardizes the life it audits. The runaway character of assessment practices is analysed in terms of cultural practice. Higher education is intimately bound up with the origins of such practices, and is not just the latter day target of them. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence to: M. Strathern, Department of Social Anthropology, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RF, UK.
References
Hide All
1McWilliams-Tullberg, R. (1973) Women in Cambridge. A Men's University—Though of a Mixed Type. London, Victor Gollancz, p. 27.
2Sutherland, G. (1994) Emily Davies, the Sidgwicks and the education of women in Cambridge. In Cambridge Minds. Mason, R. (Ed.). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 36.
3Hoskin, K. (1996) The ‘awful idea of accountability’: inscribing people into the measurement of objects. In Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing, Munro, R. and Mouritsen, J. (Eds). London, International Thomson Business Press, and references therein.
4Beer, G. (1996) Can the native return? In Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
5Power, M. (1994) The Audit Explosion. London, Demos.
6Cambridge University Reporter, 16 October 1992.
7Rose, N. (1990) Governing the Soul. The Shaping of the Private Self. London, Routledge.
8Gibbons, M. et al. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London, Sage.
9Beck, U. (1994) The reinvention of politics. In Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (Eds). Oxford, Polity, pp. 56.
10Glasner, A. (1966) Teaching and learning in anthropology: the HEFCE review of anthropology provision in England and Northern Ireland. Anthropology in Action 3.
11Shore, C. and Wright, S. (1997) Introduction. In Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power. London, Routledge.
12Cox, R. (1996) Teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. Anthropology in Action 3, 22.
13Riles, A. (1996) The Actions of Fact. Ph.D. dissertation, Trinity College, Cambridge.
14The Guardian 5 November 1996.
15Munro, R.. The cultural performance of control. MSS University of Keele.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Review
  • ISSN: 1062-7987
  • EISSN: 1474-0575
  • URL: /core/journals/european-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score