Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:20:21.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Literature, Theory and Politics of the Long ’68: The Last Season of Modernism and Peripherality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2020

Marko Juvan*
Affiliation:
ZRC SAZU Institute of Slovenian Literature and Literary Studies, Novi trg 2, SI-1000Ljubljana, Slovenia. Email: marko.juvan@zrc-sazu.si

Abstract

As part of the Yugoslav in-between periphery, Ljubljana became a site of interaction between an antisystemic movement, literature and theory, the fields that in Paris were arguably only co-present during the long 1968. Following Franco Moretti and Perry Anderson’s notion of modernism as a cultural field of force experiencing the imaginative proximity of social revolution, the experimental literature of the 1960s may be viewed as the last season of modernism. This is when modernism in Slovenia synchronized with Paris, the metropole that Pascale Casanova has described as the Greenwich meridian of literary modernity. Peripheries in the literary world-system are, for Moretti, forced into a belated compromise between local perspectives and globalized forms emanating from metropoles. In this case, however, it is due to its peripherality that Slovenian literature was able to produce an innovative political interlacement of theory and literature (for example, the internationally acclaimed neo-avant-garde group OHO and the Ljubljana Lacanian circle). In the 1960s and 1970s, the Ljubljana student journal Tribuna published experimental literature, (post)structuralist theory and antisystemic political writings. The mere contiguity of these discourses evoked their interaction. Even stronger modes of interaction characterized their production and mediation, such as writer-theorists translating French theory or various hybrids of theory and literature. Slavoj Žižek’s early hybrid texts show the emergence of theory as a parasite of literature and philosophy. They deconstruct the (nationalist) author function. A scandal provoked by Žižek in 1967 foretells the split of the ‘68 avant-garde between the theoretical and literary faction in the 1970s.

Type
Focus: May ’68 and Its Philosophers: Paris, Beijing, Ljubljana
Copyright
© 2020 Academia Europaea

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, P (1984) Modernity and revolution. New Left Review 144, 96113.Google Scholar
Anonymus (1975) Umetnost, družba/tekst: nekaj pripomb o sedanjih razmerjih razrednega boja na področju književne produkcije in njenih ideologij. Problemi – Razprave 13(3–5), 110.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P (1986) The forms of capital. In Richardson, JG (ed), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, pp. 241258.Google Scholar
Casanova, P (2004) The World Republic of Letters. Translated by DeBevoise, MB. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Combes, P (2008) Mai 68, les écrivains, la littérature. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Debord, G (2006) Theses on cultural revolution. In Knabb, K (ed and trans), Situationist International Anthology: Revised and Expanded Edition. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets, pp. 5354.Google Scholar
Dedić, N (2016) On Yugoslav poststructuralism: introduction to ‘Art, society/text’ (1975). ARTMargins 5(3), 93101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J (1978) Writing and Difference. Translated by Bass, A. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J (1988) Signature event context. In Derrida, J, Limited Inc. Translated by Weber, S and Mehlman, J. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 123.Google Scholar
Drake, D (2002) Intellectuals and Politics in Post-War France. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ďurišin, D (1992) Čo je svetová literatúra. Bratislava: Obzor.Google Scholar
Ferry, L and Renaut, A (1990) French Philosophy of the Sixties: An Essay on Antihumanism. Trans. Cattani, MHS. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, J, et al. (2005) Slovenska novejša zgodovina, Vol 2. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga.Google Scholar
Geister, I (1967) Pojasnilo in odgovor. Tribuna 18(4), 23.Google Scholar
Gobille, B (2018) Le Mai 68 des écrivains: crise politique et avan-gardes littéraires. Paris: CNRS éditions.Google Scholar
Harvey, D (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M (1978) The origin of the work of art. In Heidegger, M, Basic Writings. Translated by Farrell Krell, D. London: Routledge, pp. 83140.Google Scholar
Jameson, F (2002) A Singular Modernity. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Juvan, M (2006) Dialogues between ‘thinking’ and ‘poetry’ and theoretical-literary hybrids. Primerjalna književnost 29(Special Issue), 189209.Google Scholar
Juvan, M (2008) History and Poetics of Intertextuality. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Juvan, M (2019a) Peripheral modernism and the world-system: Slovenian literature and theory of the nineteen-sixties. Slavica Tergestina 23(2), 168199.Google Scholar
Juvan, M (2019b) Worlding a Peripheral Literature. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kermauner, A (1966) Knjiga Aleša Kermavnerja. Ljubljana: Zveza študentov Jugoslavije v Ljubljani.Google Scholar
Klasić, H (2012) Jugoslavija i svijet 1968. Zagreb: Ljevak.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J (1984) Revolution in Poetic Language. Translated by Waller, M. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, J (2007) The Other Side of Psychoanalysis: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII. Translated by Grigg, R, edited by Miller, J-A. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
McShine, KL (ed.) (1970) Information: Summer 1970. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Moretti, F (2005) Signs Taken for Wonders: On the Sociology of Literary Forms, 2nd edn. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Moretti, F (2013) Distant Reading. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Novak, J (1967) Živi in mrtvi miti. Tribuna 18(4), 3.Google Scholar
Rabaté, J-M (2009) 68 + 1: Lacan’s année érotique . Parrhesia (6), 2845.Google Scholar
Ross, K (2002) May ’68 and its Afterlives. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šuvaković, M (2001) Anatomija angelov: razprave o umetnosti in teoriji v Sloveniji po letu 1960. Translated by Vičič, V. Ljubljana: Znanstveno in publicistično središče.Google Scholar
Tötösy de Zepetnek, S (1999) Configurations of postcoloniality and national identity: in-between peripherality and narratives of change. The Comparatist (23), 89110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinen, R (2018) The Long ’68: Radical Protest and Its Enemies. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I (2014) Antisystemic movements, yesterday and today. Journal of World-Systems Research 20(2), 158172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick Research Collective (2015) Combined and Uneven Development: Towards a New Theory of World-Literature. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Wollaeger, M and Eatough, M (eds) (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, S (1967a) Aleš Kermavner. JAZ – VLOGA. Tribuna 18(1), 5.Google Scholar
Žižek, S (1967b) Aleš Krmauner. Zveza artikel – ime. Tribuna 18(2), 10.Google Scholar