Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Taipale, Sakari and Fortunati, Leopoldina 2014. Capturing methodological trends in mobile communication studies. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 17, Issue. 5, p. 627.


    ×

Rich Media and Rich Science; Web Squared Cumulativity Conceptualization

  • Oscar Westlund (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1062798711000433
  • Published online: 30 March 2012
Abstract

Scientists work by collecting observable evidence of different phenomena, from which they analyse and construct theoretical explanations. Consequently, science involves systematic efforts to increase human knowledge, a phenomenon that is usually described as ‘cumulativity’. Most scientists would probably agree that (excellent) research should be cumulative, and by this they usually mean that scientists should accommodate and refer to the publications of other scholars. This article suggests that our perception of science would benefit from a broader and more nuanced approach to cumulativity. The article therefore provides a discussion on how contemporary scholars can approach cumulativity by adopting the fundamental ideology of the web 2.0 and web squared concepts. A proposition for an altered approach is posited through web squared cumulativity conceptualization, involving a more open and collaborative approach. The discussion provides a foretaste of contemporary initiatives that suggest the spread of this emerging trend.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1.R.K. Merton (1988) The Matthew Effect in science, II: cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79, pp. 606623.

2.S. Arunachalam (2008) Open access to scientific knowledge. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 28, p. 7.

8.R.K. Merton (1968) The Matthew Effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science considered. Science, 159(3810), pp. 5663.

14.A-S. Axelsson and R. Schroeder (2009) e-enabled data-sharing in Sweden. Acta Sociologica, 52, pp. 213225.

15.M. Levy (2009) Web 2.0 implications on knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), pp. 120134.

18.G. Vossen and S. Hagemann (2007) Unleashing Web 2.0: from concepts to creativity, (Boston, MA: Morgan Kaufmann).

22.G. Eysenbach (2006) Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biol, 4, pp. 06920698.

23.J.A. Evans and J. Reimer (2009) Open access and global participation in science. Science, 323, p. 1025.

24.F. Mann , B. Von Walter , T. Hess and R.F. Wigand (2009) Open access publishing in science. Communications of the ACM, 52, pp. 135139.

26.A.J. Vickers (2006) Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials. Trials, 7(15), pp. 16.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Review
  • ISSN: 1062-7987
  • EISSN: 1474-0575
  • URL: /core/journals/european-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×