Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

‘Science’ and ‘Culture’ in University Settings. Areas of Overlap? Areas of Tension? Or, Areas of Mutual Complementarity?

  • Milena Žic Fuchs (a1)

Abstract

On the one hand, ‘interdisciplinarity’ in all its formats, ranging from multi- to transdisciplinarity, has become the focal point of research agendas and a high priority of many funding bodies, while, on the other hand, universities by and large still remain discipline-oriented. This ‘tension’ is especially manifest between ‘science’ and ‘culture’ in the sense of bridging gaps between disciplines and research domains. The main roles of the Humanities and Social Sciences can be said to be the development of critical and independent thought, the identification and dissemination of important social and cultural values, as well as challenging widely held assumptions and beliefs. This article focuses on new ‘interpretations’ of knowledge seen as the fundamental link, which can, within university programmes, raise the awareness of the importance of the Humanities and Social Sciences on one hand, but, more importantly, also put into a much wider context the different ‘knowledges’ necessary for the contemporary understanding of how ‘science’ should be geared towards the individual, society, as well as the global community at large.*

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All
*

A shorter Chinese version of this article appeared in Tansuo yu Zhengming (Exploration and Free Views), 2018, 1 (January), 136–140. Published here, for the first time in English, with permission.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1. Snow, C.P. (1998) The Two Cultures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), (with Introduction by Stefan Collini).
2. Leavis, F.R. (1962) Two cultures? The significance of C. P. Snow. Spectator.
3. Spencer-Oatey, H. (2012) What is culture? A compilation of quotations. GlobalPAD Core Concepts. Available at GlobalPAD Open House, p.2. http://go.warwick.ac.uk/globalpadintercultural
4. The importance of knowledge, experience and wisdom in many facets of research as well as university life are discussed in, de Corte, E., E. and Fenstad, J.E. (Eds) (2010) From Information to Knowledge; from Knowledge to Wisdom. Challenges and changes facing higher education in the digital age (London: Portland Press).
5. Mittelstraß, J. (1982) Wissenschaft als Lebensform. Reden über philosophischer Orientierungen in Wissenschaft und Universität (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp)
6. Mittelstraß, J. (2012) Science and values: On values and credibility in science and scholarship. Rendiconti Lincei, 23(Suppl. 1), pp. 2933 p. 32.
7. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge, The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (London: SAGE).
8. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2003) ’Mode 2’ revisited. The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41, pp. 179194.
9. Gibbons, M. (2002) Governance and the new production of knowledge. In: J. de la Mothe, (Ed.) Science, Technology and Global Governance (London: Routledge), p. 33.
10. Frodeman, R. and Mitcham, C. (2007) New directions in interdisciplinarity: Broad, deep, and critical. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 27(6), pp. 506514.
11. Frodeman, R., Klein, J. Thompson and Mitcham, C. (Eds) (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
12. Krohn, W. (2010) Interdisciplinary cases and disciplinary knowledge. In: R. Frodeman, J. Thompson Klein and C. Mitcham, (Eds) (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 3138 p. 31.
13. Brown, R., Deletic, A. and Wong, H.F. (2015) How to catalyse collaboration. Nature, 525, September 2015.
17. Frodeman, R. (2014) Sustainable Knowledge. A Theory of Interdisciplinarity (New York: Palgrave Macmillan)
21.For further details on the concept of ‘bioethics’, especially from a European perspective, see , Čović, A. (2012) The Europeanization of bioethics. In A. Muzur and H. Sass, (Eds) Fritz Jahr and the Foundations of Global Bioethics. The Future of Integrative Bioethics (Berlin, Münster, Vienna, Zurich, London: LIT Verlag), pp. 194196.
22. Potter, V.R. (1971) Bioethics: Bridge to the future (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed