Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:39:10.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuous cropping legumes in semi-arid Southern Africa: Legume productivity and soil health implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2022

Arun D. Jani Open the ORCID record for Arun D. Jani [Opens in a new window] ,
Timothy N. Motis ,
Joy M. Longfellow ,
Brandon J. Lingbeek  and
Christopher J. D’Aiuto
Arun D. Jani*
Affiliation:
ECHO, Inc., 17391 Durrance Road, North Fort Myers, FL33917, USA Department of Biology and Chemistry, California State University, Monterey Bay, 100 Campus Center, Seaside, CA93955, USA
Timothy N. Motis
Affiliation:
ECHO, Inc., 17391 Durrance Road, North Fort Myers, FL33917, USA
Joy M. Longfellow
Affiliation:
ECHO, Inc., 17391 Durrance Road, North Fort Myers, FL33917, USA Johnny’s Selected Seeds, 955 Benton Avenue, Winslow, ME04901, USA
Brandon J. Lingbeek
Affiliation:
ECHO, Inc., 17391 Durrance Road, North Fort Myers, FL33917, USA
Christopher J. D’Aiuto
Affiliation:
ECHO, Inc., 17391 Durrance Road, North Fort Myers, FL33917, USA Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group, 130 North Garden Street, Visalia, CA93291, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: ajani@csumb.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Legume agronomic research in Southern Africa has often focused on integrating legumes into smallholder cereal cropping systems, but there is limited information available on the feasibility and soil health implications of continuous cropping legumes in the region. Continuous legumes may be suitable in areas with large livestock populations where a premium is placed on high-quality forage, or where efforts are underway to reclaim degraded cropland. Our objectives in this study were to (i) evaluate the performance of diverse legumes under continuous cropping and conservation tillage management with no fertility inputs and (ii) assess the response of soil health parameters to continuous legumes in a semi-arid environment. A 4-year study was conducted in Limpopo, South Africa beginning in the 2011–2012 growing season in which 10 legume and fallow treatments were imposed in the same plots for 4 growing seasons. All legumes responded negatively in varying degrees to continuous cropping in terms of biomass and nutrient accumulation. Lablab (Lablab purpureus L.) was the top-performing legume in the study and accumulated 4.5–13 Mg ha−1 of biomass and 153–345, 11–34, and 75–286 kg ha−1 of N, P, and K, respectively. Lablab often outperformed natural fallow, while other legumes generally performed as well as or inferior to natural fallow, depending on species and growing season. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp) was especially incompatible with continuous cropping and averaged less than 252 kg ha−1 and 2.1 Mg ha−1 of grain and biomass, respectively, from 2012–2013 to 2014–2015. Continuous cropping did not lead to sustained improvements in soil health. By 2014–2015, soil organic matter for all treatments had either declined or resembled baseline values. Rates of potentially mineralizable N in cowpea, lablab, vining mucuna (Mucuna pruriens var. Utilis), natural fallow, and bare ground plots fell by 70–96% during the study. There was also evidence for lower recovery of leached K by legumes compared to natural fallow species. In conclusion, legumes, such as lablab, should be considered as continuous forages on marginal land in areas where high-quality forage is in demand, but continuous cropping legumes without fertility inputs are not an effective strategy for improving soil health on degraded cropland in this semi-arid region of Southern Africa. Future research efforts may focus on the grazing strategies and baling frequencies required to optimize annual biomass accumulation of continuous lablab to meet livestock demand and support smallholder livelihoods.

Keywords

LegumesSoil healthSouthern AfricaNutrient cycling
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 58 , 2022 , e15
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abad, P., Favery, B., Rosso, M.N. and Castagnone-Sereno, P. (2003). Root-knot nematode parasitism and host response: molecular basis of a sophisticated interaction. Molecular Plant Pathology 4, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adegbite, A.A. (2011). Assessment of Yield Loss of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) due to Root Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita under Field Conditions. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 1, 79–85.Google Scholar
Adegbite, A.A. and Agbaje, G.O. (2007). Efficacy of Furadan (Carbofuran) in control of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita Race 2) in hybrid yam varieties in South-western Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Science 3, 256–262.Google Scholar
Agri Laboratory Association of Southern Africa (AgriLASA) (2004). Method no. 8 for extractible cations: Ammonium acetate (1 mol.dm-3, pH 7) Method no. 20 for Extractable Phosphorus: Bray-1, and Method no. 33 for Extractible inorganic N: KCl (1 mol.dm-3). Pretoria, South Africa: In AgriLASA Soil Handbook.Google Scholar
Agri Laboratory Association of Southern Africa (AgriLASA) (2007a). Method no. 4.7 for feeds and plants. In Palic, P., Claasens, A.S., Collier, J., Loock, A. and Hattingh, D. (eds), Agrilasa Handbook of Feeds and Plant Analysis, 2nd Edn., Vol. 1. Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
Agri Laboratory Association of Southern Africa (AgriLASA) (2007b). Method no. 6.1.1 for feeds and plants. In Palic, P, Claasens, A.S., Collier, J., Loock, A. and Hattingh, D. (eds), Agrilasa Handbook of Feeds and Plant Analysis, 2nd Edn., Vol. 1., Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
Bagayoko, M., Mason, S.C., Traore, S. and Eskridge, K.M. (1996). Pearl millet/cowpea cropping systems yield and soil nutrient levels. African Crop Science Journal 4, 453–462.Google Scholar
Barratt, N., Chitundu, D., Dover, O., Elsinga, J. Eriksson, S., Guma, L., Haggblade, M., Haggblade, S., Henn, T.O., Locke, F.R., O’Donnell, C., Smith, C. and Stevens, T. (2006). Cassava as drought insurance: Food security implications of cassava trials in Central Zambia. Agrekon 45, 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco-Canqui, H. and Jasa, P.J. (2019). Do grass and legume cover crops improve soil properties in the long term? Soil Science Society of America Journal 83, 1181–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronick, C.J. and Lal, R. (2005). Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chawe, K.G., Venkataramana, P.B. and Ndakidemi, P.A. (2019). Assessment of farmers’ indigenous knowledge and preferences: A tool for sustainable lablab bean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet) improvement and utilization in northern Tanzania. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology 21, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, B.G., Pengelly, B.C., Schultze-Kraft, R., Taylor, M., Burkart, S., Cardoso Arango, J.A., González Guzmán, J.J., Cox, K., Jones, C. and Peters, M. (2020). Tropical Forages: An Interactive Selection Tool, 2nd and Revised Edn. Nairobi, Kenya: International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia and International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Available at www.tropicalforages.info.Google Scholar
Davies, B.E. (1974). Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of soil organic matter. Soil Science Society of America Journal 38, 150–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovey, S.B., Du Toit, B. and De Clercq, W.P. (2014). Nutrient leaching under zero tension in a subtropical clonal eucalypt plantation on a sandy soil in South Africa. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 31, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dube, E., Chiduza, C. and Muchaonyerwa, P. (2012). Conservation agriculture effects on soil organic matter on a Haplic Cambisol after four years of maize–oat and maize–grazing vetch rotations in South Africa. Soil and Tillage Research 123, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, C. (2019). Exploring the viability of re-introducing Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet as a multifunctional legume in northern Tanzania. MS Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Franke, A.E., van den Brand, G.J., Vanlauwe, B. and Giller, K.E. (2018). Sustainable intensification through rotations with grain legumes in Sub-Sahara Africa: a review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 261, 172–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzluebbers, K., Juo, A.S. and Manu, A. (1994). Decomposition of cowpea and millet amendments to a sandy Alfisol in Niger. Plant and Soil 167, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gugino, B.K., Idowu, O.J., Schindelbeck, R.R., van Es, H.M., Wolfe, D.W., Moebius-Clune, B.N., Thies, J.E. and Abawi, G.S. (2009) Cornell Soil Health Assessment Training Manual, 2nd Edn. Ithica, NY: Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.Google Scholar
Hassink, J., Bouwman, L.A., Zwart, K.B., Bloem, J. and Brussaard, L. (1993). Relationships between soil texture, physical protection of organic matter, soil biota, and C and N mineralization in grassland soils. In Brussaard, L. and Kooistra, M.J. (eds), Soil Structure/Soil Biota Interrelationships. Pretoria, South Africa: Elsevier, pp. 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jingura, R.M., Sibanda, S. and Hamudikuwanda, H. (2001). Yield and nutritive value of tropical forage legumes grown in semi-arid parts of Zimbabwe. Tropical Grasslands 35, 168–174.Google Scholar
Jiri, O. and Mafongoya, P.L. (2018). Tracking the release of soil nitrate and labile C in A legume-maize rotation in Zimbabwe. Sustainable Agriculture Research 7, 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyei-Boahen, S., Savala, C.E., Chikoye, D. and Abaidoo, R. (2017). Growth and yield responses of cowpea to inoculation and phosphorus fertilization in different environments. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, G., Messina, J.P., Peter, B.G. and Snapp, S.S. (2017). Mapping land suitability for agriculture in Malawi. Land Degradation & Development 28, 2001–2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughin, T.M. (2006). Improved experimental design and analysis for long-term experiments. Crop Science 46, 2492–2502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madembo, C., Mhlanga, B. and Thierfelder, C. (2020) Productivity or stability? Exploring maize-legume intercropping strategies for smallholder Conservation Agriculture farmers in Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems 185, 102921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahal, N.K., Castellano, M.J. and Miguez, F.E. (2018). Conservation agriculture practices increase potentially mineralizable nitrogen: a meta-analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 82, 1270–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamuye, M., Nebiyu, A., Elias, E. and Berecha, G. (2020). Short-term improved fallows of Tephrosia vogelii and Cajanus cajan enhanced maize productivity and soil chemical properties of a degraded fallow land in Southwestern Ethiopia. Agroforestry Systems 94, 1681–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapiye, C., Chimonyo, M., Dzama, K., Raats, J.G. and Mapekula, M. (2009) Opportunities for improving Nguni cattle production in the smallholder farming systems of South Africa. Livestock Science 124, 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapiye, C., Foti, R., Chikumba, N., Poshiwa, X., Mwale, M., Chivuraise, C. and Mupangwa, J.F. (2006). Constraints to adoption of forage and browse legumes by smallholder dairy farmers in Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development 18.Google Scholar
Mapiye, C., Mwale, M., Mupangwa, J.F., Mugabe, P.H., Poshiwa, X. and Chikumba, N. (2007). Utilisation of ley legumes as livestock feed in Zimbabwe. Tropical Grasslands 41, 84–91.Google Scholar
Mhere, O., Maasdorp, B. and Titterton, M. (2002). Forage Production and Conservation Manual. Growing and Ensiling Annual and Perennial Forage Crops Suited to Marginal and Semi-Arid Areas of Southern Africa. London, UK: DFID.Google Scholar
Mishra, S., Zhang, W., Lin, Z., Pang, S., Huang, Y., Bhatt, P. and Chen, S. (2020). Carbofuran toxicity and its microbial degradation in contaminated environments. Chemosphere 259, 127419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motis, T.N., Longfellow, J.M., Jani, A.D., Lingbeek, B.J., D’Aiuto, C.J. and Bergen, J.C.J. (2017). Productivity of Moringa oleifera augmented with intercropped tropical legumes. I International Symposium on Moringa 1158, 85–96.Google Scholar
Munthali, M.G., Gachene, C.K.K., Sileshi, G.W. and Karanja, N.K. (2014). Amendment of tephrosia improved fallows with inorganic fertilizers improves soil chemical properties, N uptake, and maize yield in Malawi. International Journal of Agronomy 2014, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mupakati, T. and Tanyanyiwa, V.I. (2017). Cassava production as a climate change adaptation strategy in Chilonga Ward, Chiredzi District, Zimbabwe. Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 9, a348.Google ScholarPubMed
Musokwa, M. and Mafongoya, P.L. (2021). Effects of improved pigeonpea fallows on biological and physical soil properties and their relationship with maize yield. Agroforestry Systems 95, 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Njunie, M.N., Wagger, M.G. and Luna-Orea, P. (2004). Residue decomposition and nutrient release dynamics from two tropical forage legumes in a Kenyan environment. Agronomy Journal 96, 1073–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nkonki-Mandleni, B., Ogunkoya, F.T. and Omotayo, A.O. (2019). Socioeconomic factors influencing livestock production among smallholder farmers in the free state province of South Africa. International Journal of Entrepreneurship 23, 1–7.Google Scholar
Nyagumbo, I., Mkuhlani, S., Pisa, C., Kamalongo, D., Dias, D. and Mekuria, M. (2016) Maize yield effects of conservation agriculture based maize–legume cropping systems in contrasting agro-ecologies of Malawi and Mozambique. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 105, 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odhiambo, J. (2011) Potential use of green manure legume cover crops in smallholder maize production systems in Limpopo province, South Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 107–112.Google Scholar
Odhiambo, J.J. (2010). Decomposition and nitrogen release by green manure legume residues in different soil types. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 090–096.Google Scholar
Okogun, J.A., Sanginga, N., Abaidoo, R., Dashiell, K.E. and Diels, J. (2005). On-farm evaluation of biological nitrogen fixation potential and grain yield of Lablab and two soybean varieties in the northern Guinea savanna of Nigeria. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 73, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2020). GIEWS – Global Information and Early Warning System. Available at http://www.fao.org/giews/country-analysis/en/.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT (2020). Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.Google Scholar
Natural Resources Conservation Service (2014). Soil Quality Indicators: Potentially Mineralizable Nitrogen (PMN). USDA. Available at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/soils/health/assessment/?cid=stelprdb1237387.Google Scholar
Pohl, B., Macron, C. and Monerie, P.A. (2017). Fewer rainy days and more extreme rainfall by the end of the century in Southern Africa. Scientific Reports 7, 46466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pypers, P., Huybrighs, M., Diels, J., Abaidoo, R., Smolders, E. and Merckx, R. (2007) Does the enhanced P acquisition by maize following legumes in a rotation result from improved soil P availability? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39, 2555–2566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pypers, P., Van Loon, L., Diels, J., Abaidoo, R., Smolders, E. and Merckx, R. (2006) Plant-available P for maize and cowpea in P-deficient soils from the Nigerian Northern Guinea Savanna–comparison of E-and L-values. Plant and Soil 283, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riekert, H.F. and Henshaw, G.E. (1998). Effect of soybean, cowpea and groundnut rotations on root-knot nematode build-up and infestation of dryland maize. African Crop Science Journal 6, 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusike, J., Mahungu, N.M., Jumbo, S., Sandifolo, V.S. and Malindi, G. (2010). Estimating impact of cassava research for development approach on productivity, uptake and food security in Malawi. Food Policy 35, 98–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahrawat, K.L. (2006). Organic matter and mineralizable nitrogen relationships in wetland rice soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 37, 787–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyman, H.A. (2005). Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid South Africa—I: influence on seasonal root distribution, root/shoot ratios and water-use efficiency. Journal of Arid Environments 60, 457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyman, H.A. (2009). Root studies on grass species in a semi-arid South Africa along a soil-water gradient. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 131, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, A.M., Balkcom, K.S., Wood, C.W., Guertal, E.A. and Weaver, D.B. (2017). Nitrogen mineralization from ‘AU Golden’ sunn hemp residue. Journal of Plant Nutrition 40, 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tui, S.H.K., Valbuena, D., Masikati, P., Descheemaeker, K., Nyamangara, J., Claessens, L., Erenstein, O., Van Rooyen, A. and Nkomboni, D. (2015). Economic trade-offs of biomass use in crop-livestock systems: Exploring more sustainable options in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems 134, 48–60.Google Scholar
van Vugt, D., Franke, A.C. and Giller, K.E. (2018). Understanding variability in the benefits of N2-fixation in soybean-maize rotations on smallholder farmers’ fields in Malawi. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 261, 241–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanlauwe, B., Hungria, M., Kanampiu, F. and Giller, K.E. (2019). The role of legumes in the sustainable intensification of African smallholder agriculture: Lessons learnt and challenges for the future. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 284, 106583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, S., Chen, Z., Man, J. and Zhou, J. (2019). Effect of large inputs of manure and fertilizer on nitrogen mineralization in the newly built solar Greenhouse soils. HortScience 54, 1600–1604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar