Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T06:47:28.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2012

Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies, Kolkata 700123, India
Institute of Computational Science, University of Lugano, 6906 Lugano, Switzerland
Machine Learning Laboratory, TU Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany
Corresponding author. Email:


A survey of the system of rice intensification (SRI)-related literature indicates that different authors have drawn conflicting inferences about rice yield performances under the SRI, chiefly because the SRI methodology has been variously advocated, interpreted and implemented in the field using different rice varieties, seedling ages at transplantation, cultivation seasons and nutrient management regimes. In particular, the SRI method of single-seedling transplantation (SST) has potential economic advantage due to reduced seed costs, but it is not clear whether SST is an effective management strategy across a range of seedling ages, and whether there is any specific seedling age that is optimal for yield improvement of a given rice variety. This is an important consideration in rain-fed ecosystems where variable rainfall patterns and lack of controlled irrigation make it difficult to reliably transplant at a specific seedling age as recommended for the SRI. We conducted a five year-long experiment on a rain-fed organic farm using a short-duration upland and a medium-duration lowland landrace, following the SRI methodology. Rice seedlings of different ages (6, 10, 14, 18 and 28 days after establishment) were transplanted at 25 cm × 25 cm spacing in three replicated plots. The performance for each landrace was examined with respect to productive tillers, panicle density, total grain counts per hill and grain yield per unit area. Performances of seedlings of different ages were compared with that of control plots that employed all SRI practices with the exception that 28-day-old seedlings were transplanted with three seedlings per hill. The results indicate that (1) the SRI can improve mean panicle density if seedling age ≤ 18 days, but that responses differ between varieties; (2) the number of productive tillers per hill is significantly less in SST than that of multiple seedling transplants (MST) of 28-day-old seedlings of both upland and lowland varieties; (3) the total grain numbers per hill of the lowland variety is significantly greater for 14-day-old SST than 28-day-old MST; (4) the grain yield per unit area from young SRI transplants is significantly greater than that from 28-day-old MST for the lowland variety, although the magnitude of the improvement was small; (5) for the upland variety, grain yields declined with the oldest seedlings, but planting multiple seedlings per hill made the yield of the oldest transplants on par with that of younger seedlings planted singly. Our findings suggest that transplanting younger seedlings under the SRI management may not necessarily enhance grain yields.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Africare (2008). The system of rice intensification (SRI): first experiences from Timbuktu, Mali, Farmer-led SRI test in Goundam 2007/2008. Africare. Bamako, Mali. [Accessed 7 February 2012]Google Scholar
Atlin, G. N., Lafitte, H. R., Tao, D., Laza, M., Amante, M. and Courtois, B. (2006). Developing rice cultivars for high-fertility upland systems in the Asian tropics. Field Crops Research 97:4352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Datta, S. K. (1981). Principles and Practices of Rice Production. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
de Laulaníe, H. (1993). Le syste`me de riziculture intensive malgache. Tropicultura 11;110114.Google Scholar
Deb, D. (2005). Seeds of Tradition, Seeds of Future: Folk Rice Varieties Eastern India. New Delhi, India: Research Foundation for Science Technology & Ecology.Google Scholar
Dobermann, A. (2004). A critical assessment of the system of rice intensification (SRI). Agricultural Systems 79:261281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farooq, M., Kobayashi, N., Wahid, A., Ito, O. and Basra, S. M. A. (2009). Strategies for producing more rice with less water. Advances in Agronomy 101:351388.Google Scholar
Fujita, K. (2010). The Green Revolution and Its Significance for Economic Development: The Indian Experience and Its Implications for Sub-Saharan Africa. JICA-RI Working Paper No. 14, Japan International Cooperation Agency Research Institute, Shinjuku-ku, Japan. URL: [Accessed 7 February 2012]Google Scholar
Gani, A., Rahman, A., Dahono, R. and Hengsdijk, H. (2002). Synopsis of water management experiments in Indonesia. In Water-Wise Rice Production, 2937 (Eds. Bouman, B. A. M., Hengsdijk, A., Hardy, B., Bindraban, P. S., Tuong, T. P. and Ladha, J. K.). Los Baños, Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
Government of West Bengal (2009). Economic Review 2009–2010, Statistical Appendix. Kolkata, India: Government of West Bengal. [Accessed 7 February 2012]Google Scholar
Government of India (2011). Methods Manual: Soil Testing in India. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.Google Scholar
Hargrove, W. and Pickering, J. (1992). Pseudoreplication: a sine qua non for regional ecology. Landscape Ecology 6:251258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horie, T., Shiraiwa, T., Homma, K., Katsura, K., Maeda, Y. and Yoshida, H. (2005). Can yields of lowland rice resume the increases that they showed in the 1980s? Plant Production Science 8:251272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Food Policy Research Institute (2002). Green Revolution: Curse or Blessing? Washington, DC: IFPRI. [Accessed 7 February 2012]Google Scholar
Krishna, A. and Biradarpatil, N. K. (2009). Influence of seedling age and spacing on seed yield and quality of short duration rice under system of rice intensification cultivation. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 22:5355.Google Scholar
Kropff, M. J., Cassman, K. G., Peng, S., Matthews, R. B. and Setter, T. L. (1994). Quantitative understanding of yield potential. In Breaking the Yield Barrier, 2138 (Ed. Cassman, K. G.). Proceedings of a Workshop on Rice Yield Potential in Favorable Environments. Los Baños, Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
Latif, M. A., Islam, M. R., Ali, M. Y. and Saleque, M. A. (2005). Validation of the system of rice intensification (SRI) in Bangladesh. Field Crop Research 93:281292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latif, M. A., Ali, M. Y., Islam, M. R., Badshah, M. A. and Hasan, M. S. (2009). Evaluation of management principles and performance of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Bangladesh. Field Crops Research 114:255262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linquist, B. A., Keoboualapha, B., Sipaseuth, and Inthapanya, P. (2006). Rice production systems of Laos. In Rice in Laos, 2945 (Eds. Schiller, J. M., Chanphengxay, M. B., Linquist, B. and Appa Rao, S.). Los Baños, Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
McDonald, A. J., Hobbs, P. R. and Riha, S. J. (2006). Does the system of rice intensification outperform conventional best management? A synopsis of the empirical record. Field Crops Research 96:3136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, A. J., Hobbs, P. R. and Riha, S. J. (2008). Stubborn facts: still no evidence that the system of rice intensification out-yields best management practices (BMPs) beyond Madagascar. Field Crops Research 108:188191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, O. (2002). Farmer alternative wet/dry, non-flooded and continuously flooded irrigation practices in traditional and intensive systems of rice cultivation in Madagascar. MSc thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Mahender Kumar, R., Surekha, K., Padmavathi, C., Subba Rao, L. V., Latha, P. C., Prasad, M. S., Babu, V. R., Ramprasad, A. S., Rupela, O. P., Goud, V., Raman, P. M., Somashekar, N., Ravichandran, S., Singh, S. P. and Viraktamath, B. C. (2010). Research experiences on system of rice intensification and future directions. Journal of Rice Research 2:6171.Google Scholar
Makarim, A. K., Balasubramanian, V., Zaini, Z., Syamsiah, I., Diratmadja, I. G. P. A., Handoko, A., Wardana, I. P. and Gani, A. (2002). Systems of rice intensification (SRI): evaluation of seedling age and selected components in Indonesia. In Water-Wise Rice Production, 129139 (Eds. Bouman, B. A. M., Hengsdijk, A., Hardy, B., Bindraban, P. S., Tuong, T. P. and Ladha, J. K.). Los Baños, Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
Miah, M. R. H., Talukder, S., Sarkar, M. A. R. and Ansari, T. H. (2004). Effect of number of seedling per hill and urea super granules on growth and yield of the rice cv.BINA dhan4. Journal of Biological Science 4:122129.Google Scholar
Menete, M. Z. L., van Es, H. M., Brito, R. M. L., DeGloria, S. D. and Famba, S. (2008). Evaluation of system of rice intensification (SRI) component practices and their synergies on salt affected soils. Field Crops Research 109:3444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, A. and Salokhe, V. M. (2008). Seedling characteristics and the early growth of transplanted rice under different water regimes. Experimental Agriculture 44:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, B. (2002). Varietal improvement for rice production in India. In Genetic Diversity in Rice Production, 3791 (Ed. Nguen, V. N.). Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Nissanka, S. P. and Bandara, T. (2004). Comparison of productivity of system of rice intensification and conventional rice farming systems in the dry-zone region of Sri Lanka. Paper presented at 4th International Crop Science Congress (26 September–1 October), Brisbane, Australia. [Accessed 7 February 2012]Google Scholar
Pasuquin, E., Lafarge, T. and Tubana, B. (2008). Transplanting young seedlings in irrigated rice fields: early and high tiller production enhanced grain yield. Field Crops Research 105:141155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oupkaew, P., Pusadee, T., Sirabanchongkran, A., Rerkasem, K., Jamjod, S. and Rerkasem, B. (2011). Complexity and adaptability of a traditional agricultural system: case study of a gall midge-resistant rice landrace from northern Thailand. Genetic Resource and Crop Evolution 58:361372. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-010-9579-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oziegbe, M. and Faluyi, J. O. (2007). Effects of seeding rate on the yield components of an enhanced rice cultivar (DTPMFe+) Oryxa sativa Linn. International Journal of Botany 3:317320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, S. and Pal, S. (2007). Are less-favored environments over-invested? The case of rice research in India. Food Policy 32:606623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, K. R. and Sheer, S. 1992. Effect of seedlings age and number hill−1 on the yield of rice in a sodic soil. Current Agriculture 16 (2):6770.Google Scholar
Rahman, M. H., Khatun, M. M., Mamun, M. A. A., Islam, M. Z. and Islam, M. R. (2007). Effect of number of seedling hill−1 and nitrogen level on growth and yield of BRRI dhan. Journal of Soil Nature 1:17.Google Scholar
Rafaralahy, S. (2002). An NGO perspective on SRI and its origins in Madagascar. In Proceedings of International Conference on Assessment of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI), Sanya, China, April 1–4, 1722 (Eds. Uphoff, N., Fernandes, E. C. M., Yuan, L. P., Peng, J. M., Rafaralahy, S. and Rabenandrasana, J.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Intl. Inst. for Food, Agriculture and Development.Google Scholar
San-Oh, Y., Mano, Y., Ookawa, T. and Hirasawa, T. (2004). Comparison of dry matter production and associated characteristics between direct-sown and transplanted rice plants in a submerged paddy field and relationships to planting patterns. Field Crops Research 87:4358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarvestani, Z. T., Pirdashti, H., Sanavi, S. A. M. M. and Balouchi, H. (2008). Study of water effects in different growth stages on yield and yield components of different rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 11:13031309.Google ScholarPubMed
Satyanarayana, A., Thiyagarajan, T. M. and Uphoff, N. (2007). Opportunities for water saving with higher yield from the system of rice intensification. Irrigation Science 25:99115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnier, H. F., Dingkuhn, M., De Datta, S. K., Mengel, K. and Faronilo, J. E. (1990). Nitrogen fertilization of direct-seeded flooded vs. transplanted rice. I. Nitrogen uptake, photosynthesis, growth and yield. Crop Science 30:12761284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senthilkumar, K., Bindraban, P. S., Thiyagarajan, T. M., de Ridder, N. and Giller, K. E. (2008). Modified rice cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India: yield gains and farmers’ (lack of) acceptance. Agricultural Systems 98:8294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehy, J. E., Peng, S., Dobermann, A., Mitchell, P. L., Ferrer, A., Yang, J., Zou, Y., Zhong, X. and Huang, J. (2004). Fantastic yields in the system of rice intensification: fact or fallacy? Field Crops Research 88:18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, T. R. and Cassman, K. G. (2004). Agronomic UFOs? Field Crops Research 88:910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehy, J. E., Sinclair, T. R. and Cassman, K. G. (2005). Curiosities, nonsense, nonscience and SRI. Field Crops Research 91:355356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, S. K. and Talati, J. (2007). Productivity impacts of the system of rice intensification (SRI): a case study in West Bengal, India. Agricultural Water Management 87:5560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoop, W. A., Uphoff, N. and Kassam, A. (2002). A review of agricultural research issues raised by the system of rice intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: opportunities for improving farming systems for resource-poor farmers. Agricultural Systems 71:249274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoop, W. A., Adam, A. and Kassam, A. (2009). Comparing rice production systems: a challenge for agronomic research and for the dissemination of knowledge-intensive farming practices. Agricultural Water Management 96:14911501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Styger, E., Aboubacrine, G., Attaher, M. A. and Uphoff, N. (2011). The system of rice intensification as a sustainable agricultural innovation: introducing, adapting and scaling up a system of rice intensification practices in the Timbuktu region of Mali. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9:6775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, A. K., Uphoff, N. and Antony, E. (2010a). An assessment of physiological effects of system of rice intensification (SRI) practices compared with recommended rice cultivation practices in India. Experimental Agriculture 46 (1):7798. doi:10.1017/S0014479709990548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, A. K., Rath, S., Roychowdhury, S. and Uphoff, N. (2010b). Comparative performance of rice with System of Rice Intensification (SRI) and conventional management using different plant spacings. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 196:146159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsujimoto, Y., Horie, T., Randriamihary, H., Shiraiwa, T. and Homma, K. (2009). Soil management: the key factors for higher productivity in the fields utilizing the system of rice intensification (SRI) in the central highland of Madagascar. Agricultural Systems 100:6171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A. J. (1997). Experiments in Ecology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uphoff, N. (2003): Higher yields with fewer external inputs? The system of rice intensification and potential contributions to agricultural sustainability. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 1:3850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uphoff, N., Fernandes, E. C. F., Yuan, L. P., Peng, J., Rafaralahy, S. and Rabenandrasana, J. (Eds.) (2002). Proceedings of International Conference on Assessment of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI), Sanya, China, April 1–4. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Intl. Inst. for Food, Agriculture and Development. Scholar
Uphoff, N., Kassam, A. and Stoop, W. (2008). A critical assessment of a desk study comparing crop production systems: the example of the ‘system of rice intensification’ versus ‘best management practice’. Field Crops Research 108:109114 [Accessed 7 February 2012].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xing, Y. and Zhang, Q. (2010). Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61:11.111.22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed