Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-llmch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-09T18:59:13.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PHOTOPERIOD EFFECTS ON FLOWERING AND SEED SETTING OF HYPERICUM PERFORATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2010

CHUNG LI CHEN
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 0227, Taiwan
YUEN JEN TSAI
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 0227, Taiwan
JIH MIN SUNG*
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, Hungkuang University, Shalu, Taichung County, 43302, Taiwan
*
Corresponding author: sungjm@sunrise.hk.edu.tw

Summary

The effects of day length extension and night interruption on flowering responses of St John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) plants were investigated. Field-grown plants were subjected to five different day lengths (11, 13, 15, 17 and 19 h d−1) or night interruption for 70 days. The results indicated that St John's Wort is a long-day plant requiring a critical day length of 15 hd−1 for flowering induction. Both day length extension (duration longer than 15 h) and night interruption, with artificial light (fluorescent lamps that delivered 30 μmol m−2 s−1 photosynthetic photon flux density at plant height) were effective for flowering induction and seed setting. Day length extension or night interruption experienced by the maternal plant also affected the germination responses of the seeds produced. Plants that had received 19 h of day length treatment produced seeds with better germination responses. Night interruption with daylight type fluorescent lamps was also effective for producing relatively high quality seeds, although these seeds had slightly lower germination rates and longer mean germination time than seeds produced under 19 h of day length. Such a night interruption system could be considered for seed production of St John's Wort on a commercial scale.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, S. R., Pearson, S. and Hadley, P. (1997). The effects of temperature, photoperiod and light integral on the time to flowering of pansy cv. Universal Violet (Viola x wittrockiana Gams.). Annals of Botany 80: 107112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J., Anderson, L. A. and Phillipson, J. D. (2001). St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.): a review of its chemistry, pharmacology and clinical properties. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 53: 583600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blázquez, M. A. (2000). Flower development pathways. Journal of Cell Science 113: 35473548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutterman, Y. (1996). Effect of day length during plant development and caryopsis maturation on flowering and germination, in addition to temperature during dry storage and light during wetting, of Schismus arabicus (Poaceae) in the Negev dessert, Israel. Journal of Arid Environments 33: 439448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamamoto, H., Shimaji, H. and Higashide, T. (2003). Budding and bolting responses of horticultural plants to night-break treatments with LEDs of various colors. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology 59: 103110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imaizumi, T. and Kay, S. A. (2006). Photoperiodic control of flower: not only by coincidence. Trends in Plant Science 11: 550558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, N., Patil, G. G. and Gislerød, H. R. (2005). Effect of photoperiod and light integral on flowering and growth of Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn. Scientia Horticulturae 103: 441451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, S. and Clark, S. E. (2005). Photoperiod regulates flower meristem development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 169: 907915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khokhar, K. M., Hadley, P. and Pearson, S. (2007). Effect of photoperiod and temperature on inflorescence appearance and subsequent development towards flowering in onion raised from sets. Scientia Horticulturae 112: 915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, C.-T., Sung, J.-M. and Chen, C.-L. (2008). 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid soaking promotes rooting in stem tip cuttings of Hypericum perforatum. Journal of Agriculture and Forest 57: 99110.Google Scholar
Medina, M. A., Martinez-Poveda, B., Amores-Sanchez, M. I. and Quesada, A. R. (2006). Hyperforin: more than an antidepressiant bioactive compound? Life Science 79:105111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munir, J., Dorn, L. A., Donohue, K. and Schmitt, J. (2001). The effect of maternal photoperiod on seasonal dormancy in Arabidopsis thallana (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 12401249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofir, M. and Kigel, J. (2006). Opposite effects of daylength and temperature on flowering and summer dormancy of Po a bulbosa. Annals of Botany 97: 659666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, N. K. B. (2003). Hypericum botany. In Hypericum; The Genus Hypericum, 122 (Ed Ernst, E.). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Runkle, E. S., Heins, R. D., Cameron, A. C. and Carlson, W. H. (1998). Flowering of herbaceous perennials under various night interruption and cyclic lighting treatments. HortScience 33: 672677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinomura, T. (1997). Phytochrome regulation of seed germination. Journal of Plant Research 110:151161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stirling, K. J., Clark, R. J., Brown, P. H. and Wilson, S. J. (2002). Effect of photoperiod on flower bud initiation and development in myoga (Zingiber mioga Roscoe). Scientia Horticulturae 95: 261268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, B. (2006). Light signals and flowering. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 33873393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaz, A. P. A., Figueiredo-Ribeiro, R.L. and Kerbauy, G.B. (2004). Photoperiod and temperature effects on in vitro growth and flowering of P. pusilla, an epiphytic orchid. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 42: 411415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, L., Sirvent, T., Gibson, D. and Vance, N. (2001). Regional differences in hypericin and psedohypericin concentrations and five morphological traits among Hypericum perforatum plants in the northwestern United States. Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 12481255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, Y. M. and Sung, J. M. (2008). Priming slows deterioration of artificially aged bitter gourd seeds by enhancing anti-oxidative activities. Seed Science and Technology 36: 350359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeevaart, J. A. D. (2006). Florigen coming of age after 70 years. Plant Cell 18, 17831789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar