Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T17:00:39.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RELAY PLANTING OF WHEAT IN COTTON: AN INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR ENHANCING PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY OF WHEAT IN COTTON–WHEAT PRODUCTION SYSTEM OF SOUTH ASIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2012

G. S. BUTTAR
Affiliation:
Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India
H. S. SIDHU
Affiliation:
IRRI-CIMMYT, CSISA Hub Punjab, Teri House, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India
VICKY SINGH
Affiliation:
IRRI-CIMMYT, CSISA Hub Punjab, Teri House, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India
M. L. JAT*
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), NASC Complex, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India
R. GUPTA
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), NASC Complex, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India
YADVINDER SINGH
Affiliation:
Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), NASC Complex, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India
BALDEV SINGH
Affiliation:
Amar Agro-Industries, Ludhiana 141003, India
*
Corresponding author. Email: M.Jat@cgiar.org

Summary

Cotton–wheat (CW) is the second most important cropping system after rice–wheat in South Asia. Sowing of wheat after cotton is usually delayed due to late pickings coupled with time needed for seedbed preparation, resulting in low wheat yield. Lack of suitable machinery is a major constraint to direct drilling of wheat into the heavy cotton stubbles. An innovative approach with much promise is the ‘2-wheel tractor-based self-propelled relay seeder’ with seed-cum-fertilizer attachment. On-farm trials were conducted at four locations during 2009–2010 and at 10 locations during 2010–2011 to evaluate the following four wheat establishment methods in CW-dominated areas of south-western Punjab, India: (1) zero till seeding in standing cotton using a self-propelled relay seeder, (2) relay seeding in standing cotton with a manual drill without prior tillage (2010 only), (3) relay broadcast seeding in standing cotton following light manual tillage and (4) conventional sowing of wheat after cotton harvest (conventional tillage and sowing with a seed–fertilizer drill). Planting of wheat under conventional practice was delayed by 20–44 days compared with relay seeding. Seed cotton yield was also significantly higher with relay seeding due to opportunity for one additional picking. Yield of wheat sown with the self-propelled relay seeder was 41.2% and 11.8% higher than with conventional practice in 2009–2010 and 2010–2011 respectively. The increase in wheat yield under relay seeding of wheat was primarily due to higher spike density and more grains per spike. The net income from the CW system was 28.2% higher for the self-propelled relay seeder than with conventional sowing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bajwa, H. S. (Ed) (2011). Package of Practices for Crops of Punjab, Rabi 2011–12, Vol. 28 (2). Ludhiana, India: Punjab Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A., Aguilar, I. M., Maurer, R. O. and Rivas, S. A. (1976). Density and row spacing effects on irrigated short wheats at low altitude. Journal of Agriculture Science (Cambridge) 87:137147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C. F., Paulson, G. A. and Ivins, J. D. (1985). Time of sowing and the development of winter wheat. Journal of Agriculture Science (Cambridge) 105:217221.Google Scholar
Grover, D. K. and Sharma, T. (2011). Alternative resources conservative technologies in agriculture: impact analysis of zero – tillage technology in Punjab. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 45:283290.Google Scholar
Gupta, R., Gopal, R., Jat, M. L., Jat, R. K., Sidhu, H. S., Minhas, P. S. and Malik, R. K. (2010). Wheat productivity in Indo-Gangetic plains of India during 2010: terminal heat effects and mitigation strategies. Professional Alliance on Conservation Agriculture (PACA) Newsletter 15:13.Google Scholar
Hobbs, P. R. and Gupta, R. K. (2003). Resource-conserving technologies for wheat in the rice-wheat system. In Improving the Productivity and Sustainability of Rice-Wheat Systems: Issues and Impacts, 149172 (Eds Ladha, J. K., Hill, J. E., Duxbury, J. M., Gupta, R. K. and Buresh, R. J.), ASA special publication number 65. Madison, WI: ASA-CSSA-SSSA.Google Scholar
Humphreys, E., Kukal, S. S., Christen, E. W., Hira, G. S., Singh, B., Yadav, S. and Sharma, R. K. (2010). Halting the groundwater decline in North-West India – which crop technologies will be winners? Advances in Agronomy 109:155217.Google Scholar
Jalota, S. K., Buttar, G. S., Sood, A., Chahal, G. B. S., Ray, S. S. and Panigrahy, S. (2008). Effects of sowing date, tillage and residue management on productivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system in northwest India. Soil &Tillage Research 99:7683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jan, A., Hammed, I. and Muhammad, T. (2000). Seed rates and sowing dates effect on the performance of wheat variety Bakhatawar-92. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 3:14091411.Google Scholar
Khan, M. B. and Khaliq, A. (2005). Production of winter cereals as relay crops by surface seeding in cotton based cropping system. Journal of Research (Science) (Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan) 16:7986.Google Scholar
Ladha, J. K., Yadvinder-Singh, , Erenstein, O. and Hardy, B. (Eds) (2009). Integrated Crop and Resource Management in the rice-wheat systems of south Asia. Los Banos, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 395 pp.Google Scholar
Mayee, C. D., Monga, D., Dhillon, S. S., Nehra, P. L. and Pundhir, P. (Eds) (2008). Cotton-Wheat Production System in South Asia: A Success Story. Bangkok, Thailand: Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions, 48 pp.Google Scholar
Nasrullah, M. H., Cheema, S. M. and Akhtar, M. (2010). Efficacy of different dry sowing methods to enhance wheat yield under cotton-wheat cropping system. Crop and Environment 1:2730.Google Scholar
Ram, H., Yadvinder-Singh, , Saini, K. S., Kler, D. S., Timsina, J. and Humphreys, E. J. (2012). Agronomic and economic evaluation of permanent raised beds, no tillage and straw mulching for an irrigated maize-wheat system in northwest India. Experimental Agriculture 48:2138.Google Scholar
Stapper, M. and Fischer, R. A. (1990). Genotype, sowing and plant spacing influence on high yielding irrigated wheat in Southern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41:10211041.Google Scholar