Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

BEYOND AVERAGES: NEW APPROACHES TO UNDERSTAND HETEROGENEITY AND RISK OF TECHNOLOGY SUCCESS OR FAILURE IN SMALLHOLDER FARMING

  • BERNARD VANLAUWE (a1), RIC COE (a2) and KEN E. GILLER (a3)
Abstract
SUMMARY

In recent years, many studies have demonstrated the heterogeneity of the smallholder production environment. Yet agronomic research for development (R4D) that aims to identify and test options for increasing productivity has not consistently adapted its approaches to such heterogeneous conditions. This paper describes the challenges facing research, highlighting the importance of variation in evaluating the performance of soil management recommendations, integrating aspects of production risk management within the formulation of recommendations, and proposing alternative approaches to implement agronomic R4D. Approaches are illustrated using two multi-locational on-farm paired trials, each having one no-input control treatment and a treatment with fertilizer application for maize in Western Kenya and for beans in Eastern Rwanda. The diversity of treatment responses should be embraced rather than avoided to gain a better understanding of current context and its relation with past management.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      BEYOND AVERAGES: NEW APPROACHES TO UNDERSTAND HETEROGENEITY AND RISK OF TECHNOLOGY SUCCESS OR FAILURE IN SMALLHOLDER FARMING
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      BEYOND AVERAGES: NEW APPROACHES TO UNDERSTAND HETEROGENEITY AND RISK OF TECHNOLOGY SUCCESS OR FAILURE IN SMALLHOLDER FARMING
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      BEYOND AVERAGES: NEW APPROACHES TO UNDERSTAND HETEROGENEITY AND RISK OF TECHNOLOGY SUCCESS OR FAILURE IN SMALLHOLDER FARMING
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
Corresponding author. IITA Kenya, c/o ICIPE, Off Thika Highway, PO Box 30772, Nairobi 00100, Kenya, Email: b.vanlauwe@cgiar.org
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C. L. Bielders and B. Gérard (2015). Millet response to microdose fertilization in south-western Niger: Effect of antecedent fertility management and environmental factors. Field Crops Research 171:165175.

R. Birner , K. Davis , J. Pender , E. Nkonya , P. Anandajayasekeram , J. Ekboir , A. Mbabu , D. J. Spielman , D. Horna , S. Benin and M. Cohen (2009). From best practice to best fit: A framework for designing and analyzing pluralistic agricultural advisory services worldwide. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 15:341355.

A. Buerkert , A. Bationo and H. Piepho (2001). Efficient phosphorus application strategies for increased crop production in sub-Saharan West Africa. Field Crops Research 72:115.

G. Djurfeldt , H. Holmén , M. Jirström and R. Larsson (2005). The African Food Crisis. Lessons from the Asian Green Revolution. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.

A. M. Fermont , P. J. A. van Asten , P. Tittonell , M. T. van Wijk and K. E. Giller (2009). Closing the cassava yield gap: An analysis from smallholder farms in East Africa. Field Crops Research 112:2436.

K. E. Giller , P. Tittonell , M. C. Rufino , M. T. van Wijk , S. Zingore , P. Mapfumo , S. Adjei-Nsiah , M. Herrero , R. Chikowo , M. Corbeels , E. C. Rowe , F. Baijukya , A. Mwijage , J. Smith , E. Yeboah , W. J. van der Burg , O. M. Sanogo , M. Misiko , N. de Ridder , S. Karanja , C. Kaizzi , J. K'ungu , M. Mwale , D. Nwaga , C. Pacini and B. Vanlauwe (2011). Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development. Agricultural Systems 104:191203.

R. Ortiz (1995). Plot Techniques for assessment of bunch weight in banana trials under two systems of crop management. Agronomy Journal 87:6369.

G. K. Robinson (1991). That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Statistical Science 6:1532.

E. Ronner , A. C. Franke , B. Vanlauwe , M. Dianda , E. Edeh , B. Ukem , A. Bala , J. van Heerwaarden and K. E. Giller (2016). Understanding variability in soybean yield and response to P-fertilizer and rhizobium inoculants on farmers’ fields in northern Nigeria. Field Crops Research, 186:133145.

J. Sumberg (2005). Constraints to the adoption of agricultural innovations - Is it time for a re-think? Outlook on Agriculture 34 (1):710.

P. Tittonell , A. Muriuki , K. D. Shepherd , D. Mugendi , K. C. Kaizzi , J. Okeyo , L. Verchot , R. Coe and B. Vanlauwe (2010). The diversity of rural livelihoods and their influence on soil fertility in agricultural systems of East Africa - A typology of smallholder farms. Agricultural Systems 103:8397.

P. Tittonell , B. Vanlauwe , P. A. Leffelaar , K. D. Shepherd and K. E. Giller (2005) Exploring diversity in soil fertility management of smallholder farms in western Kenya. II. Within farm variability in resource allocation, nutrient flows and soil fertility status. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 110:166184.

P. Tittonell , B. Vanlauwe , M. Misiko and K. E. Giller (2011). Targeting resources within diverse, heterogeneous and dynamic farming systems: Towards a ‘Uniquely African green revolution’. In Innovations as Key to the Green Revolution in Africa: Exploring the Scientific Facts, 747758 (Eds A. Bationo , B. Waswa , J. M. Okeyo , F. Maina and J. Kihara ). Dordrecht: Springer.

P. Van Asten , M. Wopereis , S. Haefele , M. O. Isselmou and M. Kropff (2003). Explaining yield gaps on farmer-identified degraded and non-degraded soils in a Sahelian irrigated rice scheme. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 50 (3–4):277296.

B. Vanlauwe , A. Bationo , J. Chianu , K. E. Giller , R. Merckx , U. Mokwunye , O. Ohiokpehai , P. Pypers , R. Tabo , K. Shepherd , R. Smaling , P. L. Woomer and N. Sanginga (2010). Integrated soil fertility management: Operational definition and consequences for implementation and dissemination. Outlook on Agriculture 39:1724.

B. Vanlauwe , K. Descheemaeker , K. E. Giller , J. Huising , R. Merckx , G. Nziguheba , J. Wendt and S. Zingore (2015). Integrated soil fertility management in sub-Saharan Africa: Unravelling local adaptation. SOIL 1 (1):491508.

B. Vanlauwe , P. Tittonell and J. Mukalama (2006). Within-farm soil fertility gradients affect response of maize to fertilizer application in western Kenya. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 76:171182.

R. L. Voortman , J. Brouwer and P. J. Albersen (2004). Characterization of spatial soil variability and its effect on Millet yield on Sudano-Sahelian coversands in SW Niger. Geoderma 121:6582.

S. Zingore , H. K. Murwira , R. J. Delve and K. E. Giller (2007). Soil type, historical management and current resource allocation: Three dimensions regulating variability of maize yields and nutrient use efficiencies on African smallholder farms. Field Crops Research 101:296305.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Experimental Agriculture
  • ISSN: 0014-4797
  • EISSN: 1469-4441
  • URL: /core/journals/experimental-agriculture
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 165 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 407 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.