Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T20:54:20.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Rhizobium Numbers on Nodulation and Dinitrogen Fixation in Groundnut†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

P. T. C. Nambiar ,
H. N. Ravishankar  and
P. J. Dart
P. T. C. Nambiar
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, PO, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
H. N. Ravishankar
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, PO, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
P. J. Dart
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, PO, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Glasshouse studies have shown that nodulation and dinitrogen fixation in groundnuts grown in a sand/vermiculite mixture increased with an increase in Rhizobium numbers inoculated onto each seed. Cultivars Robut 33-1 and TMV 2 required 106 rhizobia seed−1 for maximum nodulation and dinitrogen fixation, while cv. Kadiri 71-1 required larger numbers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 1983 , pp. 243 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, O. N. & Allen, E. K. (1940). Response of the peanut plant to inoculation with rhizobia, with special reference to morphological development of the nodules. Botanical Gazette 102:121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaduri, S. N. (1951). Influence of the numbers of Rhizobium supplied on the subsequent nodulation of the legume host plant. Annals of Botanv 15:209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broughton, W. J. & Dilworth, M. J. (1971). Control of leghaemoglobin synthesis in snake beans. Biochemical Journal 125:1075–1080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, R. E. & Gibbons, N. E. (Eds). (1974). Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, (8th Edition), 263–264. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Burton, J. C. (1976a). Pragmatic aspects of the Rhizobium-leguminous plant association. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Nitrogen Fixation, 429–446 (Eds Newton, W. E. & Nyman, C. J.). Pullman: Washington State University Press.Google Scholar
Burton, J. C. (1976b). Problems in obtaining adequate inoculation of soybeans. In World Soybean Research, 170–179 (Ed. Hill, L. D.). Illinois: The Interstate Printers and Publishers.Google Scholar
Date, R. A. (1976). Principles of Rhizobium strain selection. In Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Plants, 137–150 (Ed. Nutman, P. S.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elkan, G. H., Wynne, J. C., Schneeweis, T. J. & Isleib, T. G. (1980). Nodulation and nitrogenase activity of peanuts inoculated with single strain isolates of Rhizobium. Peanut Science 7:95–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fred, E. B., Baldwin, I. L. & McCoy, E. (1932). Root Nodule Bacteria and Leguminous Plants, 19–51. Madison: University of Wisconsin Studies.Google Scholar
Nambiar, P. T. C. & Dart, P. J. (1980). Studies on nitrogen fixation by groundnut at ICRISAT. In Proceedings of an International Workshop on Groundnuts, 110–124. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Nambiar, P. T. C., Dart, P. J., Rao, B. S. & Ravishankar, H. N. (1981). Response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to Rhizobium inoculation. In Proceedings of an International Workshop on BNF Technology for Tropical Agriculture, 241–248. Cali, Colombia: Centro Intemacional de Agricultura Tropical.Google Scholar
Perkins, A. T. (1925). The effect of bacterial numbers on the nodulation of Virginia soybeans. Journal of Agriculture Research (U.S.) 30:95–96.Google Scholar
Purchase, H. F. & Nutman, P. S. (1957). Studies on the physiology of nodule formation VI. The influence of bacterial numbers in the rhizosphere on nodule formation. Annals of Botany 21:439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rensburg, J. van & Strijdom, B. W. (1969). Strains of Rhizobium japonicum and inoculant production in South Africa. Phytophylactica 1:201–204.Google Scholar
Schiffman, J. & Alper, Y. (1968). Inoculation of peanuts by application of Rhizobium suspension into the planting furrows. Experimental Agriculture 4:219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. A. (1980). Production and quality control of legume inoculants. In Methods of Evaluating Biological Nitrogen Fixation, 489–533 (Ed. Bergersen, F. J.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Verdcourt, B. (1980). The classification of Dolichos L. emend. Verde, Lablab Adans., Phaseolus L., Vigna Savi and their allies. In Advances in Legume Science, 45–48 (Eds Summerfield, R. J. and Bunting, A. H.). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. W. (1974). Effectiveness of rhizobia forming nodules on Texas-grown peanuts. Peanuf Science 1:23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. W. & Frederick, L. R. (1972). Effect of inoculum size on nodulation of Glycine max (L.) Merill, variety Ford. Agronomy Journal 64:597–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. W. & Frederick, L. R. (1974). Effect of inoculum rate on competitive nodulation of Glycine max L. Merill. Field studies. Agronomy Journal 66:233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, J. C., Elkan, G. H., Meisner, C. M., Schneewis, T. J. & Lignon, J. M. (1980). Greenhouse evaluations of strains of Rhizobium for peanuts. Agronomy Journal 72:645–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar