Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T04:50:03.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Method and Time of Application on Uptake of Fertilizer P by Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

A. Hamid  and
G. Sarwar
A. Hamid
Affiliation:
Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology, Lyallpur, Pakistan
G. Sarwar
Affiliation:
Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology, Lyallpur, Pakistan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The efficiency of fertilizer P uptake by irrigated wheat, as affected by method and time of application, was studied in the field by using P32 labelled superphosphate. Fertilizer P was applied at planting in a sideband, with the seed, or broadcast, and broadcast at tillering. Phosphorus applied at tillering was most productive for grain and straw yield, and its utilization was significantly higher than from P applied at planting. Phosphorus broadcast at planting was least efficiently utilized. A high correlation was found between the ratio of fertilizer P to soil P in grain and straw, and with their respective yields.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1977 , pp. 337 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Barton, C. J. (1948). Analyt. Chem. 20, 1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatwright, G. O., Ferguson, H. & Brown, P. L. (1964). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 28, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatwright, G. O. & Haas, H. J. (1961). Agron. J. 53, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatwright, G. O. & Viets, F. G. Jr (1966). Agron. J. 58, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, L.A., Nelson, W. L., Mackenzie, A. J., Armiger, W. H. & Hill, W. L. (1948). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 12, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, H. G., Dehm, J. E. & Spinks, J. W. T. (1950). Can. Chem. Proc. Ind. 34, 905.Google Scholar
Dion, H. G., Spinks, J. W. T. & Mitchell, J. (1949). Sci. Agric. 29, 167.Google Scholar
Hamid, A. & Sarwar, G. (1972). Ann. Rep. NIAB, Lyallpur, Pakistan.Google Scholar
Hera, C. (1969). Tech. Rep. IAEA-113, 141.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Sen Gupta, M. B. (1966). J. Ind. Soc. Soil Sci. 14, 133.Google Scholar
Soper, R. J. & Kalra, Y. P. (1969). Can. J. Soil Sci. 49, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinks, J. W. T. & Barber, S. A. (1948). Sci. Agric. 28, 79.Google Scholar
Veall, N. (1948). Brit. J. Radiol. 21, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar