Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T09:39:21.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Time and Method of Applying Nitrogen to Dwarf Wheats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

N. K. Jain ,
D. P. Maurya  and
H. P. Singh
N. K. Jain
Affiliation:
Government Agricultural College, Kanpur, India
D. P. Maurya
Affiliation:
Government Agricultural College, Kanpur, India
H. P. Singh
Affiliation:
Government Agricultural College, Kanpur, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Linear regression of grain and straw yield of dwarf wheats on level of fertilizer nitrogen was significant, but the efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen was determined by the time and method of its application. A single application as a basal dressing was the least productive for grain yield, while split fertilization at sowing and at first irrigation increased the efficiency of applied nitrogen. Further splitting in three doses did not benefit wheat. Foliar application of nitrogen to replace top dressing at the heading stage was of no advantage while replacement of a top dressing at first irrigation by urea spray at heading was definitely deleterious.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1971 , pp. 21 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bhardwaj, R. B. L. & Wright, B. C. (1967). Indian Fmg 17 (5), 34.Google Scholar
Bhatnagar, P. S. (1966). Krishi aur Pashupalan (Hindi) 17 (4), 9.Google Scholar
Bhaumik, H. D. (1966). Fert. News 11, (8), 20.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. & Seth, J. (1968). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India 38 (A) III and IV, 307.Google Scholar
Bould, C. & Tolhurst, J. (1952) Progr. Rep. Long Ashton Res. Sta. 49.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, S. L. & Bains, S. S. (1967). Fert. News 12 (4), 11.Google Scholar
Finney, D. F., Mayer, J. W., Smith, F. W. & Fryer, H. C. (1957). Agron. J. 49, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garg, K. P. & Tomaria, P. S. (1970). Indian J. agric. Sci. 40, 155.Google Scholar
Kohli, S. P. & Anderson, R. G. (1967). Indian Fmg 17 (5), 28.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, O. N., Sinha, N. S. & Srivastava, R. D. L. (1967). Pl. Soil 26, 361.Google Scholar
Misra, N. M. & Ram, D. N. (1968). Indian J. Agron. 13, 13.Google Scholar
Misra, S. G. & Singh, B. (1969). Indian J. Agron. 14, 214.Google Scholar
Myers, H. E. & Anderson, K. L. (1942). J. Am. Soc. Agron. 34, 770.Google Scholar
Patel, J. P. & Srivastava, R. (1966). Indian Fmg 16 (4), 19.Google Scholar
Sadaphal, M. N. & Das, N. B. (1966). Agron. J. 58, 137.Google Scholar
Schreiber, H. A. & Stanberry, C. O. (1967). Agron. J. 57, 442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seth, J. (1970). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Sharma, K. C., Singh, S. P. & Kumar, V. (1966). Indian J. Agron. 11, 219.Google Scholar
Singh, I. J., Sharma, K. C. & Mishra, J. P. (1970). Indian J. agric. Econ. 25, 74.Google Scholar
Sirohi, G. S. (1965). Agric. Res. 5, 253.Google Scholar
Swaminathan, M. S. (1966). Γojana, 05 1, 2.Google Scholar