Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:12:35.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Root Growth of Four Common Bean Cultivars in Relation to Drought Tolerance in Environments with Contrasting Soil Types

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

B. N. Sponchiado
Affiliation:
Centro International de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), AA 6713, Cali, Colombia
J. W. White
Affiliation:
Centro International de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), AA 6713, Cali, Colombia
J. A. Castillo
Affiliation:
Centro International de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), AA 6713, Cali, Colombia
P. G. Jones
Affiliation:
Centro International de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), AA 6713, Cali, Colombia

Summary

Root growth of two drought tolerant and two drought sensitive bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) lines was compared at two locations in Colombia differing primarily in soil conditions. At Palmira, roots of drought tolerant lines reached a depth of 1.3 m, while drought sensitive lines only reached 0.8 m. These differences were associated with differences in seed yield, crop growth, canopy temperature and soil moisture extraction. Under acid soil conditions at Quili-chao, seed yields of supposedly drought tolerant genotypes were similar to those of the drought sensitive lines, and root growth of all four lines was restricted to less than 0.8 m. Drought avoidance through greater root growth and extraction of soil moisture appears to be an important drought tolerance mechanism in common beans, but its usefulness is limited where soil conditions restrict root growth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Howeler, R. H. (1979). Nutritional disorders. In Bean Production Problems, 343362 (Eds Schwartz, H. F. and Galvez, G. E.). Cali, Colombia: CIAT.Google Scholar
Jones, J. W. & Zur, B. (1984). Simulation of possible adaptive mechanisms in crops subjected to water stress. Irrigation Science 5:251264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, D. R. L., Jones, P. G. & Davis, J. H. C. (1984). Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) In The Physiology of Tropical Field Crops, 305351, (Eds Goldsworthy, P. R. and Fisher, N. M.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Marsh, B. A. B. (1971). Measurement of length in random arrangements of lines. Journal of Applied Ecology 8:265267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayaki, W. C., Teare, I. D. & Stone, L. R. (1976). Top and root growth of irrigated and non-irrigated soybeans. Crop Science 16:9294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, E. I. (1966). A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. Journal of Applied Ecology 3:139145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, R. K., Herrera, W. A. T., Villegas, A. N. & Pendleton, J. W. (1984). Drought responses of grain legumes under irrigation gradient: III. Plant growth. Agronomy Journal 76:557560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H. M. (1980). Postponement of severe stress in soybeans by rooting modifications: a progress report. In Proceedings of the World Soybean Research Conference II, Rayleigh, N.C., 26–29 March 1979, 161178 (Ed. Corbin, F. T.). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. M. (1983). Management of root systems for efficient water use: an overview. In Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. 87113 (Eds Taylor, H. M., Jordan, W. R. and Sinclair, T. R.). Madison: American Society Agronomy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar