Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:56:50.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Technology Development and the Spread of Direct-Seeded Flooded Rice in Southeast Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

S. K. De Datta
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna PO Box 933, Manila, Philippines

Summary

Increased labour costs and area under irrigation, the development of modern early-maturing varieties and improved fertilizer and weed management techniques have encouraged many farmers in the Philippines, Malaysia and Thailand to switch from transplanted to direct-seeded flooded rice culture. This paper summarizes the development and spread of the technology for direct-seeded flooded rice in southeast Asia and the contribution made by research at IRRI and by national programmes. It covers research on crop establishment, varietal requirements, fertilizer management, weed control and economics and examines the advantages and disadvantages of direct-seeding compared with transplanting.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernasor, P. C. & De Datta, S. K. (1983). Integration of cultural management and chemical control of weeds in broadcast-seeded flooded rice. Proceedings of the 9th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference,137155, Manila, Philippines,28 Nov.–2 Dec. 1983.Google Scholar
Bernasor, P. C. & De Datta, S. K. (1985). Chemical and cultural control of bulrush (Scirpus maritimus L.) and annual weeds in lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Research 26 (in press).Google Scholar
Chang, W. L. & De Datta, S. K. (1974). Chemical weed control in direct-seeded flooded rice in Taiwan. PANS 20:425528.Google Scholar
Cheong, A. W. (1978). Studies on Cultural Practices in Rice Cultivation. Rice Research Division Information Paper No. 1. 4052. MARDI, Serdang.Google Scholar
Cheong, Ah Wah, Othman, Omar & Tay, Chan Yong. (1982). Crop establishment in direct seeding. Paper presented at Bengkel Canaman Cabur Cerus Padi Workshop on Direct Seeding of Rice, MARDI, Selangor, Malaysia, 17 08 1982.Google Scholar
Coxhead, I. (1984). The economics of wet seeding: inducement to and consequences of some recent changes in the Philippine rice cultivation. National University, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
De Datta, S. K. (1977). Weed control in rice in Southeast Asia: methods and trends. Philippine Weed Science Bulletin 4:3965.Google Scholar
De Datta, S. K. (1981). Principles and Practices of Rice Production. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
De Datta, S. K. (1985). Advances in soil fertility research and nitrogen fertilizer management for lowland rice. Proceedings of the Workshop on Nitrogen and Rice, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Griffith, NSW, Australia, 1316 April 1985. (in press).Google Scholar
De Datta, S. K. & Bernasor, P. C. (1971). Selectivity of some new herbicides for direct-seeded flooded rice in the tropics. Weed Research 11:4146.Google Scholar
De Datta, S. K. & Bernasor, P. C. (1973). Chemical weed control in broadcast-seeded flooded tropical rice. Weed Research 13:351354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Datta, S. K. & Zarate, P. M. (1970). Environmental conditions affecting the growth characteristics, nitrogen response and grain yield of tropical rice. Proceedings of the 5th International Biometeorology Congress, 1969, Montreux, Switzerland. Biometeorology 4:7189.Google Scholar
De Datta, S. K., Krupp, H. K., Alvarez, E. L. & Modgal, S. C. (1973). Water management practices in flooded tropical rice. In Water Management in Philippine Irrigation Systems: Research and Operations, 118. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
De Datta, S. K., Fillery, I. R. P. & Craswell, E. T. (1983). Results from recent studies on nitrogen fertilizer efficiency in wetland rice. Outlook on Agriculture 12:125134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubey, A. N., Manna, G. B. & Rao, M. V. (1977). Studies on weed competition, weed control and varietal interaction with propanil and parathion in direct-seeded rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science 9:97–81.Google Scholar
Evans, L. T. & De Datta, S. K. (1979). The relation between irradiance and grain yield of irrigated rice in the tropics as influenced by cultivar, nitrogen fertilizer application and month of planting. Field Crops Research 2:117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillery, I. R., Simpson, J. R. & De Datta, S. K. (1984). The influence of field environment and fertilizer management on ammonia loss from flooded rice. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48:914920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, A. A. & Carandang, D. A. (1976). Performance of direct-seeded rice in farmers' field. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Crop Science Society of the Philippines, Davao City, Philippines, 1012 May 1976.Google Scholar
Herdt, R. W. (1982). Focusing field research on future constraints to rice production. IRRI Research Paper Series No. 76. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Ho, Nai Kin. (1984). Weed problems in the direct seeded and volunteer seedling fields in the Muda area. Paper presented at the Forum on the Pest and Disease Problems Associated with Direct Seeded Rice Cultivation, 1 Sept. 1984, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Huwat, S. E. & Hj. Yahya, Salehuddin. (1982). The Technology of Direct Seeded Rice and its Introduction to Farmers – the Northwest Selangor Experience. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Kanchanomai, P. (1983). Introducing the new technique of Na Wan Num Turn to peninsular Malaysia. Proceedings of the Workshop on the New Technique of Na Wan Num Turn (Pregerminated Direct Seeded Rice), 715, Department of Agriculture, Kuala Lumpur, 23 02 1983.Google Scholar
Kikuchi, K. M., Huysman, A. & Res, L. (1983). New rice technology and labor absorption: comparative histories of two Philippine rice villages. IRRI Research Paper Series No. 90. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Migo, T. R. & De Datta, S. K. (1983). Improvement in herbicide application technique and application timing in transplanted and broadcast-seeded flooded rice. Proceedings of the 9th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference,162175, Manila, Philippines, 28 Nov.–2 Dec. 1983.Google Scholar
Moody, K. (1977). Weed control in rice, lecture note no. 30. In 5th Biotrop Weed Science Training Course, 374424, 14 11–23 12 1977. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Rubber Research Institute.Google Scholar
Moorthy, B. T. S. & Dubey, A. N. (1979). Uptake of nitrogen by puddle seeded rice and the associated weeds under different pre-emergence herbicides. Oryza 17:132134.Google Scholar
Singh, V. P., Wickham, T. H. & Corpuz, I. T. (1978). Nitrogen movement to Laguna lake through drainage from rice fields. In Water Pollution Control in Developing Countries, 141145, 212502 1978. Bangkok, Thailand: Asian Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. & Shaw, W. C. (1966). Weeds and their control in rice production. USDA Agricultural Handbook 292. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Subiah, K. H. & Morachan, Y. B. (1976). Efficiency of herbicides in direct-sown short duration rice. Madras Agricultural Journal 63:242243.Google Scholar
Yoong, W. C. & Hui, L. C. (1982). Direct seeding of paddy: the Sekingchan experience. Projek Barat Laut Selangor (West Shore Selangor Project), Kementerian Pertanian Malaysia (Ministry of Agriculture Malaysia) BIL:PBLS/K/1 (publication).Google Scholar