Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T02:23:34.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bargaining and Dilemma Games: From Laboratory Data Towards Theoretical Synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Gary E. Bolton
Gary E. Bolton*
Affiliation:
Department of Management Science and Information Systems, 310 Beam, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
*
email: geb3@psu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bargaining and dilemma games have developed in experimental economics as fairly separate literatures. More than a few analysts are now persuaded that the patterns of behavior in these games are closely related, and considerable effort is being put into a search for models that bridge the gap between the two types of games. I focus on a handful of models that, when taken together, outline the conceptual issues, and provide a sense of the progress that has already been made.

Keywords

bargainingdilemma gamesbounded rationalitylearningmotivation

JEL classification

H41: Public Goods C78: Bargaining Theory • Matching Theory C92: Laboratory, Group Behavior

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , December 1998 , pp. 257 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbink, Klaus, Bolton, Gary E., Sadrieh, Abdolkarim, and Tang, Fang-Fang. (1996). “Adaptive Learning versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining.” Working Paper, University of Bonn.Google Scholar
Anderson, Simon P., Goeree, Jacob K., and Holt, Charles A. (forthcoming). “A Theoretical Analysis of Altruism and Decision Error.” Journal of Public Economics.Google Scholar
Andreoni, James. (1989). “Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence.” Journal of Political Economy. 97, 1447–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, James. (1993). “An Experimental Test of the Public-Goods Crowding-Out Hypothesis.” American Economic Review. 83, 1317–1327.Google Scholar
Andreoni, James. (1995a). “Cooperation in Public Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?” American Economic Review. 85, 891–904.Google Scholar
Andreoni, James. (1995b). “Warm-Glow versus Cold-Pickle: The Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 110, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, James and Miller, John H. (1993). “Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Experimental Evidence.” Economic Journal. 103, 570–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, Robert J. and Maschler, Michael. (1964). “The Bargaining Set for Cooperative Games.” In Dresher, M., Shapley, L.S., and Tucker, A.W. (eds.), Advances in Game Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 443476.Google Scholar
Bacharach, Michael and Bernasconi, Michele. (1997). “The Variable Frame Theory of Focal Points: An Experimental Study.” Games and Economic Behavior. 19, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1974). “A Theory of Social Interactions.” Journal of Political Economy. 82, 1063–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Joyce, Dickhaut, John, and McCabe, Kevin. (1995). “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social Norms.” Games and Economic Behavior. 10, 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas. (1986). “On the Voluntary and Involuntary Provision of Public Goods.” American Economic Review. 76, 789–793.Google Scholar
Binmore, Kenneth, Shaked, Avner, and Sutton, John. (1985). “Testing Noncooperative Bargaining Theory: A Preliminary Study.” American Economic Review. 75, 1178–1180.Google Scholar
Blount, Sally. (1995). “When Social Outcomes Aren't Fair: The Effect of Causal Attributions on Preferences.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 63, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Gary E. (1991). “A Comparative Model of Bargaining: Theory and Evidence.” American Economic Review. 81, 1096–1136.Google Scholar
Bolton, Gary E., Brandts, Jordi, and Ockenfels, Axel. (1998). “Measuring Motivation in the Reciprocal Responses Observed in a Dilemma Game.” Experimental Economics, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Gary E. and Katok, Elena. (1998). “An Experimental Test of the Crowding Out Hypothesis: The Nature of Beneficent Behavior.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 37, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Gary E., Katok, Elena, and Zwick, Rami. (1998). “Dictator Game Giving: Rules of Fairness versus Acts of Kindness.” International Journal of Game Theory. 27, 269–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Gary E. and Ockenfels, Axel. (1997). “ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity and Competition.” Working Paper, Penn State University.Google Scholar
Bolton, Gary E. and Ockenfels, Axel. (1998). “Strategy and Equity: An ERC-Analysis of the Güth-van Damme game.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 42, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolton, Gary E. and Zwick, Rami. (1995). “Anonymity versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining.” Games and Economic Behavior. 10, 95–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandts, Jordi and Schram, Arthur. (1996). “Cooperative Gains or Noise in Public Goods Experiments.” Working Paper, Tinbergen Institute.Google Scholar
Budescu, David V., Rapoport, Amnon, and Suleiman, Ramzi. (1995). “Common Pool Resource Dilemmas under Uncertainty: Qualitative Tests of Equilibrium Solutions.” Games and Economic Behavior. 10, 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, Colin F. (1997). “Progress in Behavioral Game Theory.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 11, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, Colin F. and Ho, Teck-Hua. (forthcoming). “Experience-weighted Attraction Learning in Normal-form Games.” Working Paper, California Institute of Technology, Econometrica.Google Scholar
Cason, Timothy N. and Mui, Vai-Lam. (1998). “Social Influence in the Sequential Dictator Game.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 42, 248–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charness, Gary. (1996). “Attribution and Reciprocity in a Simulated Labor Market: An Experimental Investigation.” Working Paper, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
de Waal, Frans B.M. (1996). Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, John and Feltovich, Nick. (forthcoming). “Does Observation of Others Affect Learning in Strategic Environments? An Experimental Study.” International Journal of Game Theory.Google Scholar
Eshel, Ilan, Samuelson, Larry, and Shaked, Avner. (1998) “Altruists, Egoists, and Hooligans in a Local Interaction Model.” American Economic Review. 88, 157–179.Google Scholar
Fehr, Ernst, Kirchsteiger, Georg, and Riedl, Arno. (1993). “Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 108, 437–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, Ernst and Schmidt, Klaus. (1997). “A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation.” Working Paper, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Forsythe, Robert, Horowitz, Joel L., Savin, N.E., and Sefton, Martin. (1994). “Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments.” Games and Economic Behavior. 6, 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudenberg, Drew and Levine, David K. (1997). “Measuring Subject's Losses in Experimental Games.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 112, 508–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, John, Binmore, Kenneth G., and Samuelson, Larry. (1995). “Learning to be Imperfect: The Ultimatum Game.” Games and Economic Behavior. 8, 56–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geanakoplos, John, Pearce, David, and Stacchetti, Ennio. (1989). “Psychological Games and Sequential Rationality.” Games and Economic Behavior. 1, 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güth, Werner. (1995). “An Evolutionary Approach to Explaining Cooperative Behavior by Reciprocal Incentives.” International Journal of Game Theory. 24, 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güth, Werner and van Damme, Eric. (1998). “Information, Strategic Behavior and Fairness in Ultimatum Bargaining: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 42, 227–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Güth, Werner, Schmittberger, Rolf, and Schwarze, Bernd. (1982). “An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 3, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güth, Werner and Yaari, Menahem. (1992). “An Evolutionary Approach to Explain Reciprocal Behavior in a Simple Strategic Game.” In Witt, U. (ed.), Explaining Process and Change—Approaches to Evolutionary Economics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 23–34.Google Scholar
Harrison, Glenn W. and Hirshleifer, J. (1989). “An Experimental Evaluation of Weakest Link/Best Shot Models of Public Goods.” Journal of Political Economy. 97, 201–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochman, Harold M. and Rodgers, James D. (1969). “Pareto Optimal Redistribution.” American Economic Review. 59, 542–557.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Elizabeth, McCabe, Kevin, Shachat, Keith, and Smith, Vernon L. (1994). “Preferences, Property Rights and Anonymity in Bargaining Games,” Games and Economic Behavior. 7, 346–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Elizabeth, McCabe, Kevin, and Smith, Vernon. (1998). “Behavioral Foundations of Reciprocity: Experimental Economics and Evolutionary Psychology,” Economic Inquiry. 36, 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huck, Steffen and Oechssler, Jorg. (forthcoming). “The Indirect Evolutionary Approach to Explaining Fair Allocations.” Games and Economic Behavior.Google Scholar
Isaac, R. Mark and Walker, James M. (1988). “Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contributions Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 103, 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, R. Mark, Walker, James M., and Williams, Arlington W. (1994). “Group Size and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence Utilizing Large Groups.” Journal of Public Economics. 54, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagel, John, Kim, Chung, and Moser, Donald. (1996). “Fairness in Ultimatum Games with Asymmetric Information and Asymmetric Payoffs.” Games and Economic Behavior. 13, 100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, James P and Rapoport, Amnon. (1974). “Test of the Bargaining Set and Kernel Models in Three- Person Games.” In Rapoport, Am. (ed.), Game Theory as a Theory of Conflict. Dordrecht. Holland: D. Reidl, pp. 119–160.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L., and Thaler, Richard H. (1986). “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics.” Journal of Business. 59, S285–S300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockesen, Levent, Ok, Efe A., and Sethi, Rajiv. (1997). “Interdependent Preference Formation.” Working Paper, Barnard College.Google Scholar
Kreps, David M., Milgrom, Paul, Roberts, John, and Wilson, Robert. (1982). “Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma.” Journal of Economic Theory. 27, 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuon, Bettina and Uhlich, Gerald R. (1993). “The Negotiation Agreement Area: An Experimental Analysis of Two-Person Characteristic Function Games.” Group Decision and Negotiation. 2, 323–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, John. (1995). “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research.” In Kagel, John H. and Roth, Alvin E. (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 111–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, David K. (1998). “Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments.” Review of Economic Dynamics. 1, 593–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D. and Palfrey, Thomas R. (1992). “An Experimental Study of the Centipede Game.” Econometrica. 60, 803–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D. and Palfrey, Thomas R. (1995). “Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games.” Games and Economic Behavior. 10, 6–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, John H. and Andreoni, James (1991). “Can Evolutionary Dynamics Explain Free Riding in Experiments?” Economics Letters. 36, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas R. and Prisbrey, Jeffrey E. (1997). “Anomalous Behavior in Public Goods Experiments: How Much and Why?” American Economic Review. 87, 829–846.Google Scholar
Prasnikar, Vesna and Roth, Alvin E. (1992). “Considerations of Fairness and Strategy: Experimental Data from Sequential Games.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 107, 865–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, D.G. (1967). “Reward Structure and Cooperation: The Decomposed Prisoner's Dilemma Game.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 7, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabin, Matthew. (1993). “Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics.” American Economic Review. 83, 1281–1302.Google Scholar
Roth, Alvin E. (1985). “Towards a Focal Point Theory of Bargaining.” In Roth, A.E. (ed.), Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Alvin E. (1995). “Bargaining Experiments,” In Kagel, J. and Roth, A.E. (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 253–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Alvin E. and Erev, Ido. (1995). “Learning in Extensive-Form Games: Experimental Data and Simple Dynamic Models in the Intermediate Term.” Games and Economic Behavior. 8, 164–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Alvin E., Malouf, Michael W.K., and Murnighan, J. Keith. (1981). “Sociological versus Strategic Factors in Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2, 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Selten, Reinhard. (1987). “Equity and Coalition Bargaining in Experimental Three-person Games.” In Roth, A.E. (ed.), Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selten, Reinhard and Krischker, W. (1982). “Comparison of Two Theories for Characteristic Function Experiments.” In Tietz, R. (ed.), Aspiration Levels in Bargaining and Economic Decision Making. Springer Lecture Notes in Economic and Mathematical Systems No. 213, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 259–264.Google Scholar
Selten, Reinhard and Ockenfels, Axel. (1998). “An Experimental Solidarity Game.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 34, 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selten, Reinhard and Stoecker, Rolf. (1986). “End Behaviour in Sequences of Finite Prisoner's Dilemma Supergames: A Learning Theory Approach.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 7, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, Robert. (1984). “Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods through Voluntary Contributions.” Economic Journal. 94, 772–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Huyck, John B., Battalio, Raymond C., and Walters, Mary F. (1995). “Commitment versus Discretion in the Peasant-Dictator Game.” Games and Economic Behavior. 10, 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. (1997). Consilience. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., opening quote from p. 96.Google Scholar
Winter, Eyal and Zamir, Shmuel. (1997). “An Experiment with Ultimatum Bargaining in a Changing Environment.” Working Paper, Washington University.Google Scholar