Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:51:00.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A simplified test for preference rationality of two-commodity choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Samiran Banerjee  and
James H. Murphy
Samiran Banerjee*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322-2240
James H. Murphy*
Affiliation:
College of Business, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723, USA
*
Tel: 404-712-8168 Fax:404-727-4639 e-mail: sbaner3@emory.edu
e-mail: jmurphy@email.wcu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We provide a simplified test to determine if choice data from a two-commodity consumption set satisfies the Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preference (GARP), and thus the preference or utility maximization hypothesis. We construct an algorithm for this test and illustrate its application on experimental choice data.

Keywords

Revealed preferenceGARPLaboratory experimentsRationality

JEL classification

D12: Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis D11: Consumer Economics: Theory C91: Laboratory, Individual Behavior

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 2006 , pp. 67 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70, 737–753.10.1111/1468-0262.00302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battalio, R. C., Kagel, J. H., Winkler, R. C., Fisher, E. B. Jr., Basmann, R. L., & Krasner, L. (1973). A Test of consumer demand theory using observations of individual consumer purchases. Western Economic Journal, 11, 411–428.Google Scholar
Cox, J. C. (1997). On testing the utility hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 107, 1054–1078.10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00007.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Berry, T. R. (2001). GARP for kids: On the development of rational choice behavior. American Economic Review, 91, 1539–1545.10.1257/aer.91.5.1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzkin, R., & Richter, M. (1991). Testing strictly concave rationality. Journal of Economic Theory, 53, 287–303.10.1016/0022-0531(91)90157-YCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, H. (1958). Consistency of preference: The two-commodity case. Review of Economic Studies, 25, 124–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sippel, R. (1997). An experiment on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour. The Economic Journal, 107, 1431–1444.10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00056.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varian, H. R. (1982). The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica, 50, 945–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varian, H. R. (1988). Revealed preference with a subset of goods. Journal of Economic Theory, 46, 179–185.10.1016/0022-0531(88)90158-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warshall, S. (1962). A theorem on Boolean matrices. Journal of the American Association of Computing Machinery, 9, 11–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar