Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T19:21:08.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Testing revealed preferences for homotheticity with two-good experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Jan Heufer
Jan Heufer*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Social Science, TU Dortmund University, 44221 Dortmund, Germany
*
jan.heufer@tu-dortmund.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is shown that for two dimensional commodity spaces any homothetic utility function that rationalizes each pair of observations in a set of consumption data also rationalizes the entire set. The result is used to provide a simplified nonparametric test for homotheticity of demand and a measure for homothetic efficiency. The article thus provides a useful tool to screen data for severe violations of homotheticity before estimating parameters of homothetic utility functions. The new test and measure are applied to previously published data.

Keywords

Homothetic efficiencyHomothetic preferencesLaboratory experimentsNonparametric testsRevealed preference

JEL classification

D12: Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis D11: Consumer Economics: Theory C14: Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General C91: Laboratory, Individual Behavior

Information

Type
Article
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 1: Mechanisms and Methodology , March 2013 , pp. 114 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-012-9330-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

Afriat, S. N. (1967). The construction of a utility function from expenditure data. International Economic Review, 8(1), 67–77. 10.2307/2525382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afriat, S. N. (1972). Efficiency estimation of production functions. International Economic Review, 13(3), 568–598. 10.2307/2525845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to GARP: an experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70(2), 737–753. 10.1111/1468-0262.00302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 293–312. 10.1162/003355301556419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S., & Murphy, J. H. (2006). A simplified test for preference rationality of two-commodity choice. Experimental Economics, 9(9), 67–75. 10.1007/s10683-006-4313-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S., & Murphy, J. H. (2011). Do rational demand functions differ from irrational ones? Evidence from an induced budget experiment. Applied Economics, 43(26), 3863–3882. 10.1080/00036841003724486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosi, G. (1998). A note on the existence of continuous representations of homothetic preferences on a topological vector space. Annals of Operations Research, 80(0), 263–268. 10.1023/A:1018920132295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronars, S. G. (1987). The power of nonparametric tests of preference maximization. Econometrica, 55(3), 693–698. 10.2307/1913608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candeal, J. C., & Induráin, E. (1995). Homothetic and weakly homothetic preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 24(2), 147–158. 10.1016/0304-4068(94)00677-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114(3), 517–537. 10.1086/503550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipman, J. S. (1974). Homothetic preferences and aggregation. Journal of Economic Theory, 8(1), 26–38. 10.1016/0022-0531(74)90003-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., Fisman, R., Gale, D., & Kariv, S. (2007). Consistency and heterogeneity of individual behavior under uncertainty. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1921–1938. 10.1257/aer.97.5.1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. (1997). On testing the utility hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 107, 1054–1078. 10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00007.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, C. T., Loewen, P. J., & Fowler, J. H. (2011). Social preferences and political participation. Journal of Politics, 72(4), 845–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, D. L. (2009). Experiment timing and preferences for fairness. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(1), 89–95. 10.1016/j.socec.2008.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, J., & da Costa Werlang, S. (1992). Homothetic preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 21(4), 389–394. 10.1016/0304-4068(92)90016-ZCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, R., Kariv, S., & Markovits, D. (2007). Individual preferences for giving. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1858–1876. 10.1257/aer.97.5.1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, R. W. (1962). Algorithm 97: shortest path. Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery, 5(6), 345 10.1145/367766.368168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanoch, G., & Rothschild, M. (1972). Testing the assumptions of production theory: A nonparametric approach. Journal of Political Economy, 80(2), 256–275. 10.1086/259881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbaugh, W. T., & Krause, K. (2000). Children’s altruism in public good and dictator experiments. Economic Inquiry, 38(1), 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Berry, T. R. (2001). GARP for kids: on the development of rational choice behavior. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1539–1545. 10.1257/aer.91.5.1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoblauch, V. (1993). Recovering homothetic preferences. Economics Letters, 43(1), 41–45. 10.1016/0165-1765(93)90132-VCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, P.-W., & Wong, K.-C. (2000). Revealed homothetic preference and technology. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 34(3), 287–314. 10.1016/S0304-4068(00)00046-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzkin, R., & Richter, M. K. (1991). Testing strictly concave rationality. Journal of Economic Theory, 53(2), 287–303. 10.1016/0022-0531(91)90157-YCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, H. (1958). Consistency of preference: the two-commodity case. Review of Economic Studies, 25(2), 124–125. 10.2307/2296210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behavior. Economica, 5(17), 61–71. 10.2307/2548836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, E., & Stefanou, S. E. (1996). Generalization of nonparametric tests for homothetic production. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(3), 542–546. 10.2307/1243272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varian, H. R. (1982). The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica, 50(4), 945–972. 10.2307/1912771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varian, H. R. (1983). Non-parametric tests of consumer behavior. Review of Economic Studies, 50(1), 99–110. 10.2307/2296957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varian, H. R. (1988). Revealed preference with a subset of goods. Journal of Economic Theory, 46(1), 179–185. 10.1016/0022-0531(88)90158-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warshall, S. (1962). A theorem on Boolean matrices. Journal of the Association of Computing Machinery, 9(1), 11–12. 10.1145/321105.321107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Heufer supplementary material

Heufer supplementary material
Download Heufer supplementary material(File)
File 432.1 KB