Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Are responses to artificial selection for reproductive fitness characters consistently asymmetrical*?

  • R. Frankham (a1)

Summary

Non-linear offspring-parent regressions and heritabilities are expected for characters showing genetic asymmetry due to directional dominance and/or asymmetrical gene frequencies. Since reproductive fitness characters exhibit these characteristics, they should show consistently nonlinear heritabilities, with greater heritabilities in the direction of lower fitness. As a consequence, responses to bi-directional selection on fitness traits should be asymmetrical in the same direction. This prediction has been tested by an analysis of published bi-directional selection experiments for reproductive fitness traits. Significant asymmetry (24 of 30 studies) in the predicted direction was found. For studies reporting realized heritabilities, the means were 0·173 and 0·259 for lines selected for higher and lower reproductive fitness, respectively, the high lines being 33% less than the low lines. Asymmetry was evident for studies reporting realized heritabilities and for those with random mating controls of the same size as the selection lines. Consequently, it is argued that the asymmetry results from genetic asymmetries. This asymmetry has important implications in the improvement of reproductive fitness traits in plant and animal breeding.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Are responses to artificial selection for reproductive fitness characters consistently asymmetrical*?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Are responses to artificial selection for reproductive fitness characters consistently asymmetrical*?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Are responses to artificial selection for reproductive fitness characters consistently asymmetrical*?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Abplanalp, H. (1961). Linear heritability estimates. Genetical Research 21, 439448.
Arthur, J. A. & Abplanalp, H. (1975). Linear estimates of heritability and genetic correlation for egg production, body weight, conformation and egg weight of turkeys. Poultry Science 54, 1123
Bakker, K. (1969). Selection for rate of growth and its influence on competitive ability of larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 19, 541595.
Bulmer, M. G. (1980). The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Oxford University Press.
Charlesworth, B. (1980). Evolution in Age-Structured Populations. Cambridge University Press.
Charlesworth, B. (1987). The heritability of fitness. In Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives (ed. Bradbury, J. W. and Andersson, M. B.), pp. 2140. New York: John Wiley.
Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18, 237268.
Clarke, J. M., Maynard, Smith J. & Sondhi, K. C. (1961). Asymmetrical response to selection for rate of development in Drosophila subobscura. Genetical Research 2, 7081.
Costantino, R. F., Bell, A. E. & Rogler, J. C. (1967). Genetic analysis of a population of Tribolium. Heredity 22, 529539.
Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. New York: Harper and Row.
Curnow, R. N. (1960). The regression of true value on estimated value. Biometrika 47, 457460.
Dawson, P. S. (1965). Genetic homeostasis and developmental rate in Tribolium. Genetics 51, 873885.
Dawson, P. S. (1975). Directional versus stabilising selection for developmental time in natural and laboratory populations of flour beetles. Genetics 80, 773783.
de la Fuente, L. F. & San Primitivo, F. (1985). Selection for large and small litter size of the first three litters of mice. Génétique, Selection, Evolution 17, 251264.
Drickamer, L. C. (1981). Selection for age of sexual maturation in mice and the consequences for population regulation. Behavioral and Neural Biology 31, 8289.
Englert, D. C. & Bell, A. E. (1970). Selection for time of pupation in Tribolium castaneum. Genetics 64, 541552.
Falconer, D. S. (1954). Asymmetrical responses in selection experiments. In Symposium on the Genetics of Population Structure, pp. 1641. Naples: International Union of Biological Sciences, Series B, no. 15.
Falconer, D. S. (1955). Patterns of response in selection experiments with mice. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 20, 178196.
Falconer, D. S. (1965). Maternal effects and selection response. In Genetics Today, Vol. 3 (ed. Geerts, S. J.), pp. 767773. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Falconer, D. S. (1971). Improvement of litter size in a strain of mice at a selection limit. Genetical Research 17, 215235.
Falconer, D. S. (1989). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn.London: Longman.
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon.
Frankham, R. (1982). Contribution of Drosophila research to quantitative genetics and animal breeding. Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production V, 4356.
Frankham, R. & Nurthen, R. K. (1981). Forging links between population and quantitative genetics. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 59, 251263.
Frankham, R., Yoo, B. H. & Sheldon, B. L. (1988). Reproductive fitness and artificial selection in animal breeding: culling on fitness prevents a decline in reproductive fitness in lines of Drosophila melanogaster selected for increased inebriation time. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 76, 909914.
Gimelfarb, A. (1986). Offspring-parent genotypic regression: how linear is it. Biometrics 42, 6771.
Gowe, R. S. (1983). Lessons from selection studies in poultry for animal breeders. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Breeders' Roundtable, pp. 2250.
Gustafsson, L. (1986). Lifetime reproductive success and heritability: empirical support for Fisher's fundamental theorem. American Naturalist 128, 761764.
Hill, W. G. (1978). Estimation of heritability by regression using collateral relatives: linear heritability estimation. Genetical Research 32, 265274.
Hudak, M. J. & Gromko, M. H. (1989). Responses to selection for early and late development of sexual maturity in Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 38, 344351.
Hunter, P. E. (1959). Selection of Drosophila melanogaster for length of larval period. Zeitschrift für Vererbungslehre 90, 728.
Joakimsen, O. & Baker, R. L. (1977). Selection for litter size in mice. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 27, 301318.
Kempthorne, O. (1960). Biometrical relationships between relatives and selection theory. In Biometrical Genetics (ed. Kempthorne, O.), pp. 1223. London: Pergamon.
Kessler, S. (1969). The genetics of Drosophila mating behaviour. II. The genetic architecture of mating speed in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 62, 421433.
Kimura, M. (1958). On the change of population fitness by natural selection. Heredity 12, 145167.
Kojima, K. (1961). Effects of dominance and size of population on response to mass selection. Genetical Research 2, 177188.
Kojima, K. & Kelleher, T. M. (1961). Changes in mean fitness in random mating populations when linkage and epistasis are present. Genetics 46, 527540.
Lambio, A. L. (1981). Response to divergent selection for 4-week body weight, egg production and total plasma phosphorus in Japanese quail. Dissertation Abstracts International B 42, 2694.
Land, R. B. & Falconer, D. S. (1969). Genetic studies of ovulation rate in the mouse. Genetical Research 13, 2546.
Latter, B. D. H. (1965). The response to artificial selection due to autosomal genes of large effect. I. Changes in gene frequency at an additive locus. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 18, 585598.
Latter, B. D. H. (1970). Selection in finite populations with multiple alleles. II. Centripetal selection, mutation, and isoallelic variation. Genetics 66, 165186.
Lewontin, R. C. (1974). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.
Maki-Tanila, A. (1982). The validity of the heritability concept in quantitative genetics. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Manning, A. (1961). The effects of artificial selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 11, 116120.
Manning, A. (1963). Selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster based on the behaviour of one sex. Animal Behaviour 11, 116120.
Marien, D. (1958). Selection for developmental rate in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 50, 315.
Medrano, J. F. & Abplanalp, H. (1989). Prediction of selection response in asymmetrically distributed traits from selection components. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 106, 110119.
Meyer, H. H. & Enfield, F. D. (1975). Experimental evidence on limitations of the heritability parameter. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 45, 268273.
Moriwaki, D. & Fuyama, Y. (1963). Responses to selection for rate of development in D. melanogaster. Drosophila Information Service 38, 74.
Mousseau, T. A. & Roff, D. A. (1987). Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59, 181197.
Naglaki, T. (1979). Selection in dioecious populations. Annals of Human Genetics 43, 143150.
Narain, P., Joshi, C. & Prabhu, S. S. (1962). Response to selection for fecundity in D. melanogaster. Drosophila Information Service 36, 9699.
Nishida, A. (1972). Some characteristics of parent-offspring regression in body weight of Mus musculus at different ages. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 14, 292303.
Nishida, A. & Abe, T. (1974). The distribution of genetic and environmental effects and the linearity of heritability. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 16, 310.
Richardson, R. H., Kojima, K. & Lucas, H. L. (1968). An analysis of short-term selection experiments. Heredity 23, 493506.
Robertson, A. (1955). Selection in animals: synthesis. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 20, 225229.
Robertson, A. (1961). Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes. Genetical Research 2, 189194.
Robertson, A. (1977). The non-linearity of offspring-parent regression. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics (ed. Pollak, E., Kempthorne, O. and Bailey, T. B.), pp. 297304. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Roff, D. A. & Mousseau, T. A. (1987). Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58, 103118.
Sang, J. H. (1962). Selection for rate of development using Drosophila melanogaster cultured axenically on deficient diets. Genetical Research 3, 90109.
Sang, J. H. & Clayton, G. A. (1957). Selection for larval development time in Drosophila. Journal of Heredity 48, 265270.
Sewell, D., Burnett, B. & Connolly, K. (1975). Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 24, 163173.
Sherwin, R. N. (1975). Selection for mating activity in two chromosomal arrangements of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 29, 519530.
Siegel, P. B. (1965). Genetics of behavior: selection for mating ability in chickens. Genetics 52, 12691277.
Siegel, P. B. (1980). Behavior genetic analysis in chickens and quail. Proceedings of the 29th National Breeders' Roundtable, pp. 113.
Smith, K. P. & Bohren, B. B. (1974). Direct and correlated responses to selection for hatching time in the fowl. British Poultry Science 15, 597604.
Soliman, M. H. (1982). Directional and stabilising selection for developmental time and correlated response in reproductive fitness in Tribolium castaneum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 63, 111116.
Spiess, E. B. & Spiess, L. B. (1966). Selection for rate of development and gene arrangement frequencies in Drosophila persimilis. II. Fitness properties at equilibrium. Genetics 53, 695708.
Spuhler, K. P., Crumpacker, D. W., Williams, J. S. & Bradley, B. P. (1978). Response to selection for mating speed and changes in gene arrangement frequencies in descendants from a single population of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 89, 729749.
Tindell, D. & Arze, C. G. (1965). Sexual maturity of male chickens selected for mating ability. Poultry Science 44, 7072.
Turner, J. R. G. (1970). Changes in mean fitness under natural selection. In Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics (ed. Kojima, K.), pp. 3278. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed