Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T11:41:31.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gene conversion: remarks on the quantitative implications of hybrid DNA models*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Herbert Gutz
Herbert Gutz
Affiliation:
Division of Biology, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75230
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Some quantitative implications of the gene conversion models of Holliday and Whitehouse & Hastings are discussed. These models predict two kinds of mispairing when a heterozygous mutant is in hybrid DNA. It is pointed out that the latter model, in contrast to statements in the literature, does not require identical repair rates in both kinds of mispairing.

Furthermore, some peculiarities are discussed which result if, among the corrected fractions of hybrid sites, the frequency of repair to wild-type is the same in both kinds of mispairing (r = s). In the Holliday model a minimum results under this condition for the frequency of asci which show a normal 4:4 segregation, but which have originated by repair from meioses with hybrid DNA.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , February 1971 , pp. 45 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

References

REFERENCES

Emerson, S. (1966). Quantitative implications of the DNA-repair model of gene conversion. Genetics 53, 475–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerson, S. (1969). Linkage and recombination at the chromosome level. In Genetic Organization (ed. Caspari, E. W. and Ravin, A. W.), pp. 267–360. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gutz, H. (1968). Gene conversion in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Proceedings of the XII International Congress of Genetics, vol. I, p. 6.Google Scholar
Holliday, R. (1964). A mechanism for gene conversion in fungi. Genetical Research (Cambridge) 5, 282–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paszewski, A. (1970). Gene conversion: observations on the DNA hybrid models. Genetical Research (Cambridge) 15, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stahl, F. W. (1969). One way to think about gene conversion. Genetics, Supplement 61 (1), pp. 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Taylor, J. H. (1967). Patterns and mechanisms of genetic recombination. In Molecular Genetics (ed. Taylor, J. H.), part II, pp. 95–135. New York and London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1965). Crossing-over. Science Progress 53, 285–296.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1967). Secondary crossing-over. Nature 215, 1352–1359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. L. K. & Hastings, P. J. (1965). The analysis of genetic recombination on the polaron hybrid DNA model. Genetical Research (Cambridge) 6, 27–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed