Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T20:23:57.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heterogeneity among spermatogonia of Drosophila melanogaster in sensitivity to X-rays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

H. Slizynska
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh, 9
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Sensitivity of Drosophila melanogaster male germ-cells to chromosome breakage by X-rays has been measured by the structural changes found in the salivary gland chromosomes of larvae from irradiated fathers and untreated mothers. The genetical effectiveness of irradiation on the same males was measured by the frequency of sex-linked lethals.

2. Assessed by the overall percentage of germ-cells carrying structural changes, sensitivity follows the well-known pattern: it is highest in spermatids and decreases over spermatozoa and spennatocytes to spermatogonia.

3. This overall sensitivity has been analysed on three levels:

(a) The proportion in successive broods of ‘positive’ males, i.e. males which respond to irradiation. The results indicate that spermatozoa and spermatids in most or all males are equally sensitive to X-rays, while in regard to spermatogonia the males represent a heterogeneous population consisting of positive and negative males. This is fully confirmed by statistical analysis which was carried out by Dr B. Woolf.

(b) The proportion of ‘sensitive’ germ-cells per positive male, i.e. germ-cells carrying at least one structural change. While the proportion of sensitive cells per positive male is about 1:3 for spermatozoa, spermatocytes and spermatogonia, it is higher for spermatids. This is the main reason for the observed increase in overall sensitivity from spermatozoa to spermatids and for its subsequent drop in spermatocytes. On the contrary, the drastic drop in overall sensitivity from spermatocytes to spermatogonia results entirely from a drop in the proportion of positive males.

(c) The distribution of breaks in sensitive cells. The clustering of breaks in sensitive cells is highest in spermatogonia, somewhat lower in spermatids, and lowest in spermatocytes and spermatozoa. It indicates that spermatogonial cells are a heterogeneous population, consisting of cells that are either highly sensitive to X-rays or not sensitive at all.

4. The fact that the sensitivity of spermatogonia varies both between and within individual males is tentatively attributed to the presence or absence of spermatogonial mitoses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, M. L. (1960). Radiosensitivity at specific autosomal loci in mature sperm and spermatogonial cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 45, 10191022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auerbach, C. & Moser, H. (1953). Analysis of mutagenic action of formaldehyde food. I. Sensitivity of Drosophila germ cells. Z. indukt. Abstamm.-u. VererbLehre, 85, 479504.Google ScholarPubMed
Auerbach, C. (1954). Sensitivity of Drosophila testis to the mutagenic action of X-rays. Z. indukt. Abstamm.-u. VererbLehre, 86, 113125.Google Scholar
Catsch, A. & Radu, G. (1943). Über die Abhängigkeit der röntgeninduzierten Translokationsrate von Reifezustand der bestrahlten Gameten bei Drosophila melanogaster. Naturwissenschaften, 31, 318319.Google Scholar
Chandley, A. C. & Bateman, A. J. (1960). Mutagenic sensitivity of sperm, spermatids, spermatocytes and spermatogonia in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 15, 363375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffen, A. B. (1958). Occurence of chromosomal aberrations in pre-spermatocytic cells of irradiated mice. Proc. nat. acad. Sci., Wash., 44, 691694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertwig, P. (1940). Verbbare Semisterilität bei Mausen nach Röntgenbestrahlung, verursacht durch reziproke Chromosomentranslokationen. Z. indukt. Abstamm.-u. VererbLehre, 79, 127.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. C. & Nafei, H. (1963). A test for X-ray induced translocations in spermatogonia of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 4, 485486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, H. J. (1954). The nature of the genetic effects produced by irradiation. Radiation Biology, Vol. 1, Chap. 7, Section 10.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. (1951). The analysis of heterogeneity in the binomial distribution. Ann. Eugen., Lond., 16, 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, W. L. (1954). Genetic effects of radiation on mammals. Radiation Biology, Vol.1, Chap. 12.Google Scholar
Savhagen, R. (1960). The relation between the rate of induced translocations and treated cell stages in males of Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas, 46, 651667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savhagen, R. (1961 a). The frequency of XO males and induced autosomal crossovers after irradiation of Drosophila melanogaster males in air and commercial nitrogen. Hereditas, 47, 2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savhagen, R. (1961 b). The relation between X-ray sensitivity and stages of development of treated cells in spermato- and spermiogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas, 47, 4368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slizynska, A. (1963 a). Origin of repeats in Drosophila chromosomes. Genet. Res. 4, 154157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slizynska, H. (1963 b). Mutagenic effects of X-rays and formaldehyde food in spermatogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 4, 4251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobels, F. H. & Van Steenis, H. (1957). Chemical induction of crossing-over in Drosophila males. Nature, Land., 179, 2931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steffensen, D. M. (1962). A variable distance for chromosome exchange dependent on cellular activity, temperature and other conditions. Radial. Res. 16, 590.Google Scholar
Traut, H. (1960). Uber die Abhangigkeit der Rate strahleninduzierten Translokationen und recessiv geschlechtgebundener Letalfaktoren vom Stadium der Spermatogenese bei Drosophila melanogaster. Z. indulti. Abstamm.-u. VererbLehre, 91, 201205.Google Scholar
Ward, C. L. & Alexander, M. L. (1957). Cytological analysis of X-ray induced mutations in eight specific loci in the third chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 42, 4254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed