Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-jqctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-23T10:53:19.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

John Maynard Smith
Affiliation:
University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH
John Haigh
Affiliation:
University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

When a selectively favourable gene substitution occurs in a population, changes in gene frequencies will occur at closely linked loci. In the case of a neutral polymorphism, average heterozygosity will be reduced to an extent which varies with distance from the substituted locus. The aggregate effect of substitution on neutral polymorphism is estimated; in populations of total size 106 or more (and perhaps of 104 or more), this effect will be more important than that of random fixation. This may explain why the extent of polymorphism in natural populations does not vary as much as one would expect from a consideration of the equilibrium between mutation and random fixation in populations of different sizes. For a selectively maintained polymorphism at a linked locus, this process will only be important in the long run if it leads to complete fixation. If the selective coefficients at the linked locus are small compared to those at the substituted locus, it is shown that the probability of complete fixation at the linked locus is approximately exp (− Nc), where c is the recombinant fraction and N the population size. It follows that in a large population a selective substitution can occur in a cistron without eliminating a selectively maintained polymorphism in the same cistron.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Dickerson, R. E. (1971). The structure of cytochrome c and the rates of molecular evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 1, 2645.Google Scholar
Ewens, W. J. (1969). Population Genetics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Feller, W. (1966). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, 3rd ed., vol. 1. Wiley.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1971). On the biological significance of the cost of gene substitutions. American Naturalist 105, 111.Google Scholar
Haigh, J. & Maynard Smith, J. (1972). Population size and protein variation in man. Genetical Research 19, 7389.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1957). The cost of natural selection. Journal of Genetics 55, 511522.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. (1964). Diffusion models in population genetics. Journal of Applied Probability 1, 177232.Google Scholar
Kojima, K. I. & Scheffer, H. E. (1967). Survival process of linked mutant genes. Evolution 21, 518531.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1973). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1968). ‘Haldane'dilemma’ and the rate of evolution. Nature 219, 11141116.Google Scholar
Sved, J. A. (1968). Possible rates of gene substitution in evolution. American Naturalist 102, 283292.Google Scholar