Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes

Alan Robertson

doi:10.1017/S0016672300000690

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In a population under artificial selection, the effective population size may be less than the actual number of parents selected because there will be variation between families in the character under selection and consequently in the probability of selection. Expressions are developed for the magnitude of the effect, which will be greater the more intense the selection and the higher the heritability of the selected character. The inbreeding due to outstanding individuals may rise for several generations after their use.

Information

References

REFERENCES

Crow, J. F. (1954). Breeding Structure of Populations. II: Effective Population Number in Statistics and Biology. Iowa State College Press. pp. 543–556.Google Scholar

Crow, J. F. & Morton, N. E. (1955). Measurement of gene frequency drift in small populations. Evolution, 9, 202–214.CrossRef Google Scholar

Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Lush, J. L. (1947). Family merit and individual merit as bases for selection. Amer. Nat. 81, 241–261, 362–379.CrossRef Google Scholar

Morley, F. H. W. (1954). Selection for economic characters in Australian Merino sheep. IV: The effect of inbreeding. Aust. J. agric. Res. 5, 305–316.CrossRef Google Scholar

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Latter, B. D. H. and Robertson, Alan 1962. The effects of inbreeding and artificial selection on reproductive fitness. Genetical Research, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 110.

Abplanalp, H. Ogasawara, F. X. and Asmundson, V. S. 1963. Influence of selection for body weight at different ages on growth of Turkeys. British Poultry Science, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 71.

McBride, Glenorchy and Robertson, Alan 1963. Selection using assortative mating inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research, Vol. 4, Issue. 3, p. 356.

Kimura, Motoo and Crow, James F. 1963. THE MEASUREMENT OF EFFECTIVE POPULATION NUMBER. Evolution, Vol. 17, Issue. 3, p. 279.

McBride, G. 1965. Animal Breeding in the light of recent advances in Population Genetics. World's Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 314.

McBride, G and J'Ames, J W 1965. Effects of inbreeding and bristle number on reproductive success in selected lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 474.

Nordskog, A. W. 1966. The Evolution of Animal Breeding Practices—Commercial and Experimental. World's Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 207.

Nei, Masatoshi and Murata, Motoi 1966. Effective population size when fertility is inherited. Genetical Research, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 257.

Latter, B. D. H. 1966. Selection for a threshold character inDrosophilaII. Homeostatic behaviour on relaxation of selection. Genetical Research, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 205.

Barker, J. S. F. 1967. Modern problems of population genetics in animal husbandry. Der Züchter, Vol. 37, Issue. 7-8, p. 309.

Legates, J.E. 1967. Are There Limits to Genetic Improvement in Dairy Cattle?. Journal of Dairy Science, Vol. 50, Issue. 2, p. 260.

Scowcroft, W. R. 1968. Variation of scutellar bristles inDrosophila: XI. Selection for scutellar microchaetae and the correlated response of scutellar bristles. Genetical Research, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 125.

Brown, A. H. D. Daniels, J. and Latter, B. D. H. 1968. Quantitative genetics of sugarcane. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 38, Issue. 8, p. 361.

Jones, L. P. Frankham, R. and Barker, J. S. F. 1968. The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character inDrosophila: II. Long-term response to selection. Genetical Research, Vol. 12, Issue. 3, p. 249.

Cain, R. L. and Hinkelmann, K. 1970. Coefficients of inbreeding and homozygosity in recurrent selection: the one-locus case. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 40, Issue. 7, p. 327.

Miller, C. C. Gill, J. L. and McGilliard, L. D. 1971. Selection, linkage, and dominance in small populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 130.

Cannings, Chris and Cavalli-Sforza, L. 1973. Advances in Human Genetics. p. 105.

Calhoon, R. E. and Bohren, B. B. 1974. Genetic gains from reciprocal recurrent and within-line selection for egg production in the fowl. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 44, Issue. 8, p. 364.

Dempfle, Leo 1974. A note on increasing the limit of selection through selection within families. Genetical Research, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 127.

Nordskog, A.W. Tolman, H.S. Casey, D.W. and Lin, C.Y. 1974. Selection in Small Populations of Chickens. Poultry Science, Vol. 53, Issue. 3, p. 1188.

Download full list

Article contents

Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes

Extract

Information

References

REFERENCES

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests