Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-rz4zl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-05T10:59:32.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The independence of germ-cell genotype from somatic influence in chimaeric mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Anne McLaren
Anne McLaren
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Animal Genetics, Institute of Animal Genetics, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mouse chimaeras made by aggregating embryos homozygous for nine recessive genes with embryos carrying the corresponding dominants were mated with partners of the recessive strain. Progeny were either of the recessive type for all loci examined, or showed the dominant characters at all loci. Tail length in homozygous vestigial-tail progeny was unaffected by whether the fertilizing spermatozoon had undergone maturation in a chimaera or in a control vestigial-tail male. There was thus no indication that the germ cells had been in any way modified by their intimate association with germ cells and somatic tissue of contrasting genotype in the chimaeras.

Information

Type
Short Papers
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 1975 , pp. 83 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, E. (1972). The localization of acid phospLatase and the uptake of horseradish peroxidase in the oocyte and follicle cells of mammals. In Oogenesis (ed. Biggers, J. D. and Schuetz, A. W.), pp. 87–117. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Bowman, P. & McLaren, A. (1970). Viability and growth of mouse embryos after in vitro culture and fusion. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 23, 693–704.Google ScholarPubMed
Brökelmann, J. (1963). Fine structure of germ cells and Sertoli cells during the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in the rat. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie 59, 820–850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgoyne, P. S. (1973). The genetic control of germ cell differentiation in mice. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Doy, C. H., Gresshoff, P. M. & Rolfe, B. G. (1973). Biological and molecular evidence for the transgenosis of genes from bacteria to plant cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 70, 723–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dym, M. & Fawcett, D. W. (1971). Further observations on the numbers of spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and spermatids connected by intercellular bridges in the mammalian testis. Biology of Reproduction 4, 195–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glass, L. E. (1961). Localization of autologous and heterologous serum antigens in the mouse ovary. Developmental Biology 3, 787–804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glass, L. E. (1970). Translocation of macromolecules. In Cell Differentiation (ed. Schjeide, O. A. and de Vellis, J.), pp. 201–223. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.Google Scholar
Gondos, B. & Zamboni, L. (1969). Ovarian development: The functional importance of germ cell interconnections. Fertility and Sterility 20, 176–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grüneberg, H. & McLaren, A. (1972). The skeletal phenotype of some mouse chimaeras. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London B 182, 9–23.Google Scholar
Jones, E. C. & Krohn, P. L. (1960). Orthotopic ovarian transplantation in mice. Journal of Endocrinology 20, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacGregor, H. C. & Stebbings, H. (1970). A massive system of microtubules associated with cytoplasmic movement in telotrophic ovaries. Journal of Cell Science 6, 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, R. E., Vilar, O., Heinrich, J. J., Davidson, O. W. & Alvarez, B. (1963). Transference of circulating labeled serum proteins to the follicle of the rat ovary. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 11, 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, A. (1972). Germ cell differentiation in artificial chimaeras of mice. In The Genetics of the Spermatozoon (ed. Beatty, R. A. and Gluecksohn-Waelsch, S.), pp. 313–324. Edinburgh, New York.Google Scholar
McLaren, A. (1975). Sex chimaerism and germ cell distribution in a series of chimaeric mice. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 33, in press.Google Scholar
McLaren, A. & Bowman, P. (1969). Mouse chimaeras derived from fusion of embryos differing by nine genetic factors. Nature 224, 238–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, A., Chandley, A. C. & Kofman-Alfaro, S. (1972). A study of meiotic germ cells in the gonads of foetal mouse chimaeras. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 27, 515–524.Google ScholarPubMed
Mintz, B. (1968). Hermaphroditism, sex chromosomal mosaicism and germ cell selection in allophenic mice. Journal of Animal Science 27, 51–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Mullen, R. J. & Whitten, W. K. (1971). Relationship of genotype and degree of chimerism in coat color to sex ratios and gametogenesis in chimeric mice. Journal of Experimental Zoology 178, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicander, L. (1967). An electron microscopical study of cell contacts in the seminiferous tubules of some mammals. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie 83, 375–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, W. L. & Hurst, J. G. (1945). Pure strain mice born to hybrid mothers following ovarian transplantation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 31, 267–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, M. H. L. & McLaren, A. (1974). The effect of exogenous DNA upon cleaving mouse embryos. Experimental Cell Research 86, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamboni, L. (1972). Comparative studies on the ultrastructure of mammalian oocytes. In Oogenesis (ed. Biggers, J. D. and Schuetz, A. W.), pp. 5–45. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar