Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 23
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Francuski, L. and Milankov, V. 2015. Assessing spatial population structure and heterogeneity in the dronefly. Journal of Zoology, Vol. 297, Issue. 4, p. 286.

    Nasiri, Jaber Naghavi, Mohammad Reza Kayvanjoo, Amir Hossein Nasiri, Mojtaba and Ebrahimi, Mansour 2015. Precision assessment of some supervised and unsupervised algorithms for genotype discrimination in the genus Pisum using SSR molecular data. Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 368, p. 122.

    Nazareno, Alison G. Alzate-Marin, Ana L. and Pereira, Rodrigo Augusto S. 2013. Dioecy, more than monoecy, affects plant spatial genetic structure: the case study ofFicus. Ecology and Evolution, p. n/a.

    Cossu, P Maltagliati, F Lai, T Casu, M Curini-Galletti, M and Castelli, A 2012. Genetic structure of Hediste diversicolor (Polychaeta, Nereididae) from the northwestern Mediterranean as revealed by DNA inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 452, p. 171.

    Mura, L. Cossu, P. Cannas, A. Scarpa, F. Sanna, D. Dedola, G.L. Floris, R. Lai, T. Cristo, B. Curini-Galletti, M. Fois, N. and Casu, M. 2012. Genetic variability in the Sardinian population of the manila clam, Ruditapes philippinarum. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, Vol. 41, p. 74.

    Wenzel, Marius A. Webster, Lucy M. I. Blanco, Guillermo Burgess, Malcolm D. Kerbiriou, Christian Segelbacher, Gernot Piertney, Stuart B. and Reid, Jane M. 2012. Pronounced genetic structure and low genetic diversity in European red-billed chough (Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax) populations. Conservation Genetics, Vol. 13, Issue. 5, p. 1213.

    Fernández, Maria Victoria Maltagliati, Ferruccio Pannacciulli, Federica G. and Roldán, Maria Inés 2011. Analysis of genetic variability in Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Crustacea, Aristeidae) using DNA-ISSR (Inter Simple Sequence Repeats) markers. Comptes Rendus Biologies, Vol. 334, Issue. 10, p. 705.

    Alacs, E. A. Georges, A. FitzSimmons, N. N. and Robertson, J. 2010. DNA detective: a review of molecular approaches to wildlife forensics. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 180.

    Ball, Mark C. Finnegan, Laura Manseau, Micheline and Wilson, Paul 2010. Integrating multiple analytical approaches to spatially delineate and characterize genetic population structure: an application to boreal caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in central Canada. Conservation Genetics, Vol. 11, Issue. 6, p. 2131.

    CORLATTI, LUCA HACKLÄNDER, KLAUS and FREY-ROOS, FREDY 2009. Ability of Wildlife Overpasses to Provide Connectivity and Prevent Genetic Isolation. Conservation Biology, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 548.

    Duminil, J. and Di Michele, M. 2009. Plant species delimitation: A comparison of morphological and molecular markers. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, Vol. 143, Issue. 3, p. 528.

    Glowatzki-Mullis, M.-L. Muntwyler, J. Bäumle, E. and Gaillard, C. 2009. Genetic diversity of Swiss sheep breeds in the focus of conservation research. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Vol. 126, Issue. 2, p. 164.

    Logsdon, Dale E. Miller, Loren M. and Anderson, Charles S. 2009. Evaluation of Long-Term Retention and Detection of Oxytetracycline Marks in Walleye Otoliths Using Genetic Methodology. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Vol. 138, Issue. 4, p. 872.

    Muller, F. Voccia, M. Bâ, A. and Bouvet, J. -M. 2009. Genetic diversity and gene flow in a Caribbean tree Pterocarpus officinalis Jacq.: a study based on chloroplast and nuclear microsatellites. Genetica, Vol. 135, Issue. 2, p. 185.

    Cowger, C. Brunner, P. C. and Mundt, C. C. 2008. Frequency of Sexual Recombination byMycosphaerella graminicolain Mild and Severe Epidemics. Phytopathology, Vol. 98, Issue. 7, p. 752.

    Glowatzki-Mullis, Marie-Louise Muntwyler, Jeannette Bäumle, Etienne and Gaillard, Claude 2008. Genetic diversity measures of Swiss goat breeds as decision-making support for conservation policy. Small Ruminant Research, Vol. 74, Issue. 1-3, p. 202.

    VÄHÄ, JUHA-PEKKA ERKINARO, JAAKKO NIEMELÄ, EERO and PRIMMER, CRAIG R. 2007. Life-history and habitat features influence the within-river genetic structure of Atlantic salmon. Molecular Ecology, Vol. 16, Issue. 13, p. 2638.

    Worthington Wilmer, Jessica and Wilcox, Chris 2007. Fine scale patterns of migration and gene flow in the endangered mound spring snail, Fonscochlea accepta (Mollusca:Hydrobiidae) in arid Australia. Conservation Genetics, Vol. 8, Issue. 3, p. 617.

    Craft, Kathleen J and Ashley, Mary V 2006. Population differentiation among three species of white oak in northeastern Illinois. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 36, Issue. 1, p. 206.

    HAUSER, L. SEAMONS, T. R. DAUER, M. NAISH, K. A. and QUINN, T. P. 2006. An empirical verification of population assignment methods by marking and parentage data: hatchery and wild steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Forks Creek, Washington, USA. Molecular Ecology, Vol. 15, Issue. 11, p. 3157.


Individual organisms as units of analysis: Bayesian-clustering alternatives in population genetics

  • JUDITH E. MANK (a1) and JOHN C. AVISE (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2005

Population genetic analyses traditionally focus on the frequencies of alleles or genotypes in ‘populations’ that are delimited a priori. However, there are potential drawbacks of amalgamating genetic data into such composite attributes of assemblages of specimens: genetic information on individual specimens is lost or submerged as an inherent part of the analysis. A potential also exists for circular reasoning when a population's initial identification and subsequent genetic characterization are coupled. In principle, these problems are circumvented by some newer methods of population identification and individual assignment based on statistical clustering of specimen genotypes. Here we evaluate a recent method in this genre – Bayesian clustering – using four genotypic data sets involving different types of molecular markers in non-model organisms from nature. As expected, measures of population genetic structure (FST and ΦST) tended to be significantly greater in Bayesian a posteriori data treatments than in analyses where populations were delimited a priori. In the four biological contexts examined, which involved both geographic population structures and hybrid zones, Bayesian clustering was able to recover differentiated populations, and Bayesian assignments were able to identify likely population sources of specific individuals.

Corresponding author
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Genetics Research
  • ISSN: 0016-6723
  • EISSN: 1469-5073
  • URL: /core/journals/genetics-research
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *