Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:39:03.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The induction of dominant lethal mutations in rats and mice with triethylenemelamine (TEM)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

A. J. Bateman
A. J. Bateman
Affiliation:
Cytogenetics Laboratory, Christie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute, Manchester
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. TEM resembles X-rays in inducing dominant lethal mutations in the sperm of rats and mice and sterilizing type B spermatogonia. Beyond this, however, there are several important differences.

2. The relative ease with which TEM and X-rays affect sperm and spermatogonia varies greatly. The X-ray dose which produces 50% dominant lethals in sperm (500 rad) sterilizes spermatocytes and type B spermatogonia, and has such a drastic effect on type A spermatogonia that recovery of fertility is delayed for 2½ months. The TEM dose which produces the same mutation rate in sperm (0·1 mg./kg. rat) has no detectable effect on pre-meiotic stages. Even 1 mg./kg. only sterilizes the most sensitive stage, type B spermatogonia.

3. Taking immature sperm as the standard, mature sperm are more sensitive to X-rays, but less sensitive to TEM, and early spermatids, the most sensitive stage to X-ray-induced dominant lethals, are highly resistant to TEM.

4. Spermatocytes, in which X-rays yield a mutation rate equal to immaturesperm, are highly resistant to TEM.

5. To produce the same mutation rate in immature sperm, mice require twice as much TEM as the rat in mg./kg., though approximately the same X-ray dose.

6. In contrast to mid-stage rat spermatids, which are the most sensitive stage to TEM, mouse mid-stage spermatids are resistant.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , November 1960 , pp. 381 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

References

REFERENCES

Bateman, A. J. (1958 a). Mutagenic sensitivity of maturing germ cells of the male mouse. Heredity, 12, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, A. J. (1958). Partition of dominant lethals in the mouse between unimplanted eggs and deciduomata. Heredity, 12, 467–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, Marion & Jackson, H. (1957). The action of triethylenemelamine on the fertility of male rats. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 12, 1–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Cattanach, B. M. (1959). The sensitivity of the mouse testis to the mutagenic action of triethylenemelamine. Z. Vererb. 90, 1–6.Google Scholar
Cattanach, B. M. & Edwards, R. G. (1958). The effects of triethylenemelamine on the fertility of male mice. Proc. roy. Soc. Edinb. B, 67, 54–64.Google Scholar
Clermont, Y. & Leblond, C. P. (1960). The cycle of the seminiferous epithelium of the rat and its duration as revealed by the use of tracer substance (thymidine-H3). 1959 Conf. on Physiology of Reproduction (in press).Google Scholar
Craig, A. W., Fox, B. W. & Jackson, H. (1959). The effect of irradiation on fertility of the male rat. Brit. J. Radiol. 32, 390–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fahmy, o. G. & Fahmy, Myrtle J. (1954). Cytogenic analysis of the action of carcinogens and tumour inhibitors in Drosophila melanogaster. II. The mechanism of induction of dominant lethals by 2:4:6 Tri(ethyleneimino)-1:3:5-Triazine. Jour. Genet. 52, 603–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandl, A. (1959). The effect of cysteamine on the survival of spermatogonia after X-irradiation. Int. J. Rod. Biol., 1, 131–142.Google Scholar
Oakberg, E. F. (1955). Sensitivity and time of degeneration of spermatogenic cells irradiated in various stages of maturation in the mouse. Radiat. Res. 2, 369–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakberg, E. F. (1956). Duration of spermatogenesis in the mouse and timing of stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. Amer. J. Anat. 99, 507–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ockey, C. A. (1959). Cytological studies on the effects of ethyleneimines. (Ph.D. thesis, Manchester University.)Google Scholar
Sirlin, J. L. & Edwards, R. G. (1957). Sensitivity of immature mouse sperm to the mutagenic effects of X-rays. Nature, Lond. 179, 725–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberger, E., Nelson, W. O., Boccabella, A. & Dixon, W. J. (1959). A radiomimetic effect of TEM on reproduction in the male rat. Endocrinology, 65, 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar