Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 27
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Behura, Susanta K. and Severson, David W. 2013. Codon usage bias: causative factors, quantification methods and genome-wide patterns: with emphasis on insect genomes. Biological Reviews, Vol. 88, Issue. 1, p. 49.

    Liu, Guoqing Liu, Jia and Zhang, Bingjie 2012. Compositional Bias is a Major Determinant of the Distribution Pattern and Abundance of Palindromes in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Molecular Evolution, Vol. 75, Issue. 3-4, p. 130.

    Ometto, Lino Li, Mingai Bresadola, Luisa and Varotto, Claudio 2012. Rates of evolution in stress-related genes are associated with habitat preference in two Cardamine lineages. BMC Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 7.

    Pessia, E. Popa, A. Mousset, S. Rezvoy, C. Duret, L. and Marais, G. A. B. 2012. Evidence for Widespread GC-biased Gene Conversion in Eukaryotes. Genome Biology and Evolution, Vol. 4, Issue. 7, p. 675.

    Poh, Y.-P. Ting, C.-T. Fu, H.-W. Langley, C. H. and Begun, D. J. 2012. Population Genomic Analysis of Base Composition Evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biology and Evolution, Vol. 4, Issue. 12, p. 1245.

    Webster, Matthew T. and Hurst, Laurence D. 2012. Direct and indirect consequences of meiotic recombination: implications for genome evolution. Trends in Genetics, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 101.

    Capra, J. A. and Pollard, K. S. 2011. Substitution Patterns Are GC-Biased in Divergent Sequences across the Metazoans. Genome Biology and Evolution, Vol. 3, p. 516.

    Rao, Y. Wu, G. Wang, Z. Chai, X. Nie, Q. and Zhang, X. 2011. Mutation Bias is the Driving Force of Codon Usage in the Gallus gallus genome. DNA Research, Vol. 18, Issue. 6, p. 499.

    Stoletzki, Nina 2011. The surprising negative correlation of gene length and optimal codon use - disentangling translational selection from GC-biased gene conversion in yeast. BMC Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 93.

    Weber, Claudia C and Hurst, Laurence D 2011. Support for multiple classes of local expression clusters in Drosophila melanogaster, but no evidence for gene order conservation. Genome Biology, Vol. 12, Issue. 3, p. R23.

    Weber, Claudia C. and Hurst, Laurence D. 2010. Intronic AT Skew is a Defendable Proxy for Germline Transcription but does not Predict Crossing-Over or Protein Evolution Rates in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Molecular Evolution, Vol. 71, Issue. 5-6, p. 415.

    Zeng, Kai and Charlesworth, Brian 2010. Studying Patterns of Recent Evolution at Synonymous Sites and Intronic Sites in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Molecular Evolution, Vol. 70, Issue. 1, p. 116.

    Duret, Laurent and Galtier, Nicolas 2009. Biased Gene Conversion and the Evolution of Mammalian Genomic Landscapes. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 285.

    Marion de Procé, Sophie Halligan, Daniel L. Keightley, Peter D. and Charlesworth, Brian 2009. Patterns of DNA-Sequence Divergence Between Drosophila miranda and D. pseudoobscura. Journal of Molecular Evolution, Vol. 69, Issue. 6, p. 601.

    Singh, N. D. Arndt, P. F. Clark, A. G. and Aquadro, C. F. 2009. Strong Evidence for Lineage and Sequence Specificity of Substitution Rates and Patterns in Drosophila. Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol. 26, Issue. 7, p. 1591.

    BANGHAM, JENNY KNOTT, SARA A. KIM, KANG-WOOK YOUNG, ROBERT S. and JIGGINS, FRANCIS M. 2008. Genetic variation affecting host-parasite interactions: major-effect quantitative trait loci affect the transmission of sigma virus inDrosophila melanogaster. Molecular Ecology, Vol. 17, Issue. 17, p. 3800.

    Comeron, J M Williford, A and Kliman, R M 2008. The Hill–Robertson effect: evolutionary consequences of weak selection and linkage in finite populations. Heredity, Vol. 100, Issue. 1, p. 19.

    Hadany, Lilach and Comeron, Josep M. 2008. Why Are Sex and Recombination So Common?. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1133, Issue. 1, p. 26.

    Liu, Guoqing and Li, Hong 2008. The Correlation Between Recombination Rate and Dinucleotide Bias in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Molecular Evolution, Vol. 67, Issue. 4, p. 358.

    Bangham, J. Obbard, D. J Kim, K.-W. Haddrill, P. R and Jiggins, F. M 2007. The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 274, Issue. 1621, p. 2027.


Neutral effect of recombination on base composition in Drosophila

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2003

Recombination is thought to have various evolutionary effects on genome evolution. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the base composition and recombination rate in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Because of a current debate about the accuracy of the estimates of recombination rate in Drosophila, we used eight different measures of recombination rate from recent work. We confirmed that the G+C content of large introns and flanking regions is positively correlated with recombination rate, suggesting that recombination has a neutral effect on base composition in Drosophila. We also confirmed that this neutral effect of recombination is the main determinant of the correlation between synonymous codon usage bias and recombination rate in Drosophila.

Corresponding author
Tel: +44 (0) 131 650 5543. Fax: +44 (0) 131 650 6564. e-mail:
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Genetics Research
  • ISSN: 0016-6723
  • EISSN: 1469-5073
  • URL: /core/journals/genetics-research
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *