Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T23:00:33.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-additive combining abilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Neil Gilbert
Affiliation:
Biophysics Department, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh 9
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An additive-multiplicative model is found to describe diallel cross data rather well. Estimates of the model's parameters are highly correlated from generation to generation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

References

REFERENCES

Bartlett, M. S. (1951). The effect of standardization on a χ2 approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika, 38, 337344.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (1961 a). Polygene analysis. 2. Selection. Genet. Res.. 2, 456460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, N. (1961 b). A tomato selection experiment. Genet. Res.. 2, 361372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayman, B. I. (1954 a). The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics, 39, 789809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayman, B. I. (1954 b). The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics, 10, 235244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinman, M. L. & Sprague, G. F. (1945). Relation between number of parental lines and theoretical performance of synthetic varieties of corn. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 37, 341351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukey, J. W. (1949). One degree of freedom for non-additivity. Biometrics, 5, 232242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, W. & Gilbert, N. (1960). Heterosis and the inheritance of yield in the tomato. Heredity, 14, 133149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, F. (1947). The analysis of data from all possible reciprocal crosses between a set of parental lines. Heredity, 1, 287301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar