Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Kondrashov, Alexey S
1999.
Comparative genomics and evolutionary biology.
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 6,
p.
624.
Keightley, Peter D
and
Eyre-Walker, Adam
1999.
Terumi Mukai and the Riddle of Deleterious Mutation Rates.
Genetics,
Vol. 153,
Issue. 2,
p.
515.
Keightley, Peter D
Davies, Esther K
Peters, Andrew D
and
Shaw, Ruth G
2000.
Properties of Ethylmethane Sulfonate-Induced Mutations Affecting Life-History Traits in Caenorhabditis elegans and Inferences About Bivariate Distributions of Mutation Effects.
Genetics,
Vol. 156,
Issue. 1,
p.
143.
Moss, Eric G.
2000.
Non-coding RNAs: Lightning strikes twice.
Current Biology,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 12,
p.
R436.
Koonin, Eugene V.
2000.
Bridging the gap between sequence and function.
Trends in Genetics,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
16.
Keightley, Peter D.
and
Eyre-Walker, Adam
2000.
Deleterious Mutations and the Evolution of Sex.
Science,
Vol. 290,
Issue. 5490,
p.
331.
Kent, W. James
and
Zahler, Alan M.
2000.
Conservation, Regulation, Synteny, and Introns in a Large-scale C. briggsae–C. elegans Genomic Alignment.
Genome Research,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 8,
p.
1115.
Sunyaev, Shamil R.
Lathe III, Warren C.
Ramensky, Vasily E.
and
Bork, Peer
2000.
SNP frequencies in human genes.
Trends in Genetics,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 8,
p.
335.
Fay, Justin C
Wyckoff, Gerald J
and
Wu, Chung-I
2001.
Positive and Negative Selection on the Human Genome.
Genetics,
Vol. 158,
Issue. 3,
p.
1227.
Yang, Hsiao-Pei
Tanikawa, Ana Y
and
Kondrashov, Alexey S
2001.
Molecular Nature of 11 Spontaneous de Novo Mutations in Drosophila melanogaster
.
Genetics,
Vol. 157,
Issue. 3,
p.
1285.
Keightley, Peter D
and
Eyre-Walker, Adam
2001.
Response to Kondrashov.
Trends in Genetics,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 2,
p.
77.
Kondrashov, Alexey S.
2001.
Sex and U.
Trends in Genetics,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 2,
p.
75.
Koonin, Eugene V
2001.
Computational genomics.
Current Biology,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 5,
p.
R155.
Delattre, Marie
and
Félix, Marie‐Anne
2001.
Microevolutionary studies in nematodes: a beginning.
BioEssays,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 9,
p.
807.
Bergman, Casey M.
and
Kreitman, Martin
2001.
Analysis of Conserved Noncoding DNA inDrosophilaReveals Similar Constraints in Intergenic and Intronic Sequences.
Genome Research,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 8,
p.
1335.
Eyre-Walker, Adam
and
Hurst, Laurence D.
2001.
The evolution of isochores.
Nature Reviews Genetics,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 7,
p.
549.
Zuckerkandl, Emile
2002.
Why so many noncoding nucleotides ? The eukaryote genome as an epigenetic machine.
Genetica,
Vol. 115,
Issue. 1,
p.
105.
Azevedo, Ricardo B R
Keightley, Peter D
Laurén-Määttä, Camilla
Vassilieva, Larissa L
Lynch, Michael
and
Leroi, Armand M
2002.
Spontaneous Mutational Variation for Body Size inCaenorhabditis elegans.
Genetics,
Vol. 162,
Issue. 2,
p.
755.
Petrov, Dmitri A.
2002.
Mutational Equilibrium Model of Genome Size Evolution.
Theoretical Population Biology,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 4,
p.
531.
Zhang, Zhao Lei
Harrison, Paul M
and
Gerstein, Mark
2002.
Digging Deep for Ancient Relics: A Survey of Protein Motifs in the Intergenic Sequences of Four Eukaryotic Genomes.
Journal of Molecular Biology,
Vol. 323,
Issue. 5,
p.
811.