Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-6cxwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-28T11:03:23.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to selection from new mutation and effective size of partially inbred populations. I. Theoretical results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Armando Caballero  and
Enrique Santiago
Armando Caballero*
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Scotland
Enrique Santiago
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Funcional, Universidad de Oviedo, 33071 Oviedo, Spain
*
* A. Caballero, Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT. Tel: (0131) 650 5443; E.mail: eang60@castle.ed.ac.uk; Fax: (0131) 650 6564.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effects of partial inbreeding on effective population size and rates of fixation of mutant genes are investigated in selected populations. Truncation selection and an infinitesimal model of gene effects for the selected trait are assumed. Predictions of effective size under this model are given for partial selfing and partial full-sib mating and an extension to a more general model is outlined. The joint effect of selection and partial inbreeding causes a large reduction in the effective size relative to the case of random mating. This effect is especially remarkable for small amounts of selected genetic variation. For example, for initial heritability 0·1 and proportion selected 1/6, the ratio of effective size to population size is 0·10 in populations with about 90% selfing while it is 0·85 in random mating populations. The consequence is a reduction in the fixation probability of favourable genes and, therefore, a reduction in the final response to selection. Stochastic simulations are used to investigate the effects of partial inbreeding and selection on fixation and extinction rates of genes of large effect and of recessive lethals with effects on the selected trait. For genes of very large effect, the effective size is not a critical factor and it is expected that partial inbreeding will be efficient in increasing fixation rates of recessive mutants. Lethal recessives are eliminated more frequently and their equilibrium frequency is lower under partial inbreeding, but only when their effects on the heterozygote are not very large.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , December 1995 , pp. 213 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

References

Barton, N. H., (1995). Linkage and the limits to natural selection. Genetics 140, 821–841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, P., & Christensen, K., (1990). Cyclical inbreeding in every third generation and its effect on gene fixation in relation to fitness. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 107, 254–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, M. G., (1980). The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Caballero, A., (1994). Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73, 657–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caballero, A., Etheridge, A., & Hill, W. G., (1992). The time to detection of recessive visible genes with non-random mating. Genetical Research 62, 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, A., & Hill, W. G., (1992 a). Effective size of nonrandom mating populations. Genetics 130, 909–916.Google Scholar
Caballero, A., & Hill, W. G., (1992 b). Effects of partial inbreeding on fixation rates and variation of mutant genes. Genetics 131, 493–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caballero, A., & Hill, W. G., (1992 c). Use of inbreeding in large populations. Proceedings, 43rd Annual Meeting of the E.A.A.P., Vol. 1, 152. Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Caballero, A., Keightley, P. D., & Hill, W. G., (1991). Strategies for increasing fixation probabilities of recessive mutations. Genetical Research 58, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, B., (1992). Evolutionary rates in partially selffertilizing species. American Naturalist 140, 126–148.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, B., (1994). The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants. Genetical Research 63, 213–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, B., Morgan, M. T., & Charlesworth, D., (1991). Multilocus models of inbreeding depression with synergistic selection and partial self-fertilisation. Genetical Research 57, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, B., Morgan, M. T., & Charlesworth, D., (1993). The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134, 1289–1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickerson, G. E., & Lindhé, N. B. H., (1977). Potential uses of inbreeding to increase selection response. Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics, pp. 323–342. Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S., (1989). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn.Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Futuyma, D. J., (1986). Evolutionary Biology, 2nd edn.Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
García-Dorado, A., & López-Fanjul, C., (1983). Accumulation of lethals in highly selected lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 66, 221–223.Google Scholar
Ghai, G. L., (1969). Structure of populations under mixed random and sib mating. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 39, 179–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gómez-Raya, L., & Burnside, E. B., (1990). The effect of repeated cycles of selection on genetic variance, heritability, and response. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 79, 568–574.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S., (1924). A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. II. The influence of partial selffertilisation, inbreeding, assortative mating, and selective fertilisation on the composition of Mendelian populations, and on natural selection. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (Biological Sciences) (later Biological Review) 1, 158–163.Google Scholar
Hayashi, T., & Ukai, Y., (1994). Change in genetic variance in a self-fertilizing population. Genetics 136, 693–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedrick, P. H., (1994). Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity 73, 363–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jain, S. K., (1976). The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7, 469–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlin, S., & Tavaré, S., (1982). Detecting particular genotypes in populations under nonrandom mating. Mathematical Biosciences 59, 57–75.Google Scholar
Kimura, M., (1962). On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47, 713–719.Google Scholar
Kimura, M., & Crow, J. F., (1963). The measurement of effective population number. Evolution 17, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M., & Ohta, T., (1969 a). The average number of generations until fixation of a mutant gene in a finite population. Genetics 61, 763–771.Google Scholar
Kimura, M., & Ohta, T. (1969 b). The average number of generations until extinction of an individual mutant gene in a finite population. Genetics 63, 701–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R., & Schemske, D. W., (1985). The evolution of self fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39, 24–40.Google Scholar
Li, C. C., (1976). First Course in Population Genetics. Pacific Grove, California, USA: Boxwood.Google Scholar
López, M. A., & López-Fanjul, C., (1993). Spontaneous mutation for a quantitative trait in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Distribution of mutant effects on the trait and fitness. Genetical Research 61, 117–126.Google Scholar
Madalena, F. E., & Robertson, A., (1975). Population structure in artificial selection: studies with Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 24, 113–126.Google Scholar
Merchante, M., Caballero, A., & López-Fanjul, C., (1995). Response to selection from new mutation and effective size of partially inbred populations. II. Experiments with Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 66, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milkman, R., (1978). Selection differentials and selection coefficients. Genetics 88, 391–403.Google Scholar
Peck, J. R., (1994). A ruby in the rubbish: beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Genetics 137, 597–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollak, E., (1987). On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. I. Partial selfing. Genetics 117, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollak, E., (1988). On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. II. Partial sib mating. Genetics 120, 303–311.Google Scholar
Pollak, E., & Sabran, M., (1992). On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. III. Fixation probabilities under partial selfing when heterozygotes are intermediate in viability. Genetics 131, 979–985.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., (1960). A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 153, 234–249.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., (1961). Inbreeding in artificially selected programmes. Genetical Research 2, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santiago, E., & Caballero, A., (1995). Effective size of populations under selection. Genetics 139, 1013–1030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schemske, D. W., & Lande, R., (1985). The evolution of self fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39, 41–52.Google Scholar
Simmons, M. J., & Crow, J. F., (1977). Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annual Review of Genetics 11, 49–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirkkomaa, S., (1986). Long-term response to selection with inbreeding in alternate generations. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Vol. 11, 297–302.Google Scholar
Toro, M. A. (1993 a). A new method aimed at using the dominance variance in closed breeding populations. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 25, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toro, M. A. (1993 b). A note on the use of inbreeding in progeny test schemes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 110, 234–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolliams, J. A., Wray, N. R., & Thompson, R., (1993). Prediction of long-term contributions and inbreeding in populations undergoing mass selection. Genetical Research 62, 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, N. R., & Thompson, R., (1990). Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Genetical Research 55, 41–54.Google Scholar
Wright, A. J., (1988). Some applications of the covariances of relatives with inbreeding. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Quantitative Genetics, pp. 10–20. Massachusetts, USA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Wright, S., (1922). Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. American Naturalist 56, 330–338.Google Scholar
Wright, S., (1969). Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 2, The Theory of Gene Frequencies. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yoo, B. H., (1980). Long-term selection for a quantitative character in large replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 2. Lethals and visible mutants with large effects. Genetical Research 35, 19–31.Google Scholar