Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T15:39:05.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A sex-linked enzyme in a reptile – association with a recent centric fusion in the common lizard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Jean-Michel Goux  and
Georges Pasteur
Jean-Michel Goux
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Génétique des Populations, U.A. 693 du CNRS, Université Paris-VII, 2 place Jussieu, 75221 Paris 05
Georges Pasteur
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Génétique Ecologique, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Place Eugène-Bataillon, 34060 Montpellier, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a series of Lacerta vivipara samples from southern France's central mountains, the distribution of genotypes at the mannose phosphate isomerase (MPI) locus has only been accountable as due to sex linkage in female heterogamety, provided the W chromosome carries only one of the two observed alleles in the populations sampled. This is in perfect accordance with cytogenetical data. Reasons are presented that seem to limit acceptable hypotheses for the recent origin of this sex-linked polymorphism to three: a founder effect, a point mutation in Z chromosomes after crossover suppression, or hitch-hiking with the translocation involved.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , August 1986 , pp. 21 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

References

Avery, R. A. (1975). Age structure and longevity of common lizard (Lacerta vivipara) populations. Journal of Zoology 176, 555–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbault, R. (1976). Population dynamics and reproductive patterns of three African skinks. Copeia 1976, 483–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauwens, D. & Verheyen, R. F. (1980). Aantalsfluktuaties en demograf sche karakteristieken van een populatie van de levendbarende hagedis (Lacerta vivipara). Rapport nr 11 van het Veldbiologisch Station Kalmthout.Google Scholar
Baverstock, P. R., Adams, M., Polkinghorn, R. W. & Gelder, M. (1982). A sex-linked enzyme in birds – Z-chromosome conservation but no dosage compensation. Nature 296, 763–766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bickham, J. W. (1984). Patterns and modes of chromosomal evolution in reptiles. In Chromosomes in Evolution of Eukaryotic Groups vol. 2. (ed. Sharma, A. K. and Sharma, A.), 13–40. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC.Google Scholar
van Brink, J. M. (1959). L'expression morphologique de la digamétiechez les Sauropsidés et les Monotrèmes. Chromosoma 10, 1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, J. J. (1980). Sex determination in reptiles. Quarterly Review of Biology 55, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, J. J. (1983). Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, B. (1978). Model for evolution of Y chromosomes and dosage compensation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 75, 5618–5622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. (1980). Sex differences in fitness and selection for centric fusions between sex-chromosomes and autosomes. Genetical Research 35, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chevalier, M., Dufaure, J. P. & Lécher, P. (1979). Cytogenetic study of several species of Lacerta (Lacertidae, Reptilia) with particular reference to sex chromosomes. Genetica 50, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, G. (1973). The chromosomes of the Reptilia, a cytotaxonomic interpretation. In Cytotaxonomy and Vertebrate Evolution (ed. Chiarelli, A. B. and Capanna, E.), pp. 349–424. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goux, J. M. (1978). Sélection endocyclique et polymorphisme stable. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences, sér. D 286, 125–127.Google ScholarPubMed
Heulin, B. (1984). Contribution à l'étude de la biologie des populations de Lacerta vivipara. Doctorate thesis, University of Rennes.Google Scholar
Ishii, K. & Charlesworth, B. (1977). Associations between allozyme loci and gene arrangements due to hitch-hiking effects of new inversions. Genetical Research 30, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. W. (1984). The evolution of sex chromosomes and chromosomal inactivation in reptiles and mammals. In The Structure, Development and Evolution of Reptiles (ed. M. W. J. Ferguson). Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 52, 305–316.Google Scholar
Luykx, P. (1981). A sex-linked esterase locus and translocation heterozygosity in a termite. Heredity 46, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinkovic, D. & Ayala, F. J. (1975 a). Fitness of allozyme variants in Drosophila pseudoobscura. I. Selection at the Pgm-1 and Me-2 loci. Genetics 79, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markinkovic, D. & Ayala, F. J. (1975 b). Fitness of allozyme variants in Drosophila pseudoobscura. II. Selection at the Est-5, Odh and Mdh-2 loci. Genetical Research 24, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, S. J., ed (1984). Genetic Maps 1984. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.Google Scholar
Ohno, S. (1967). Sex Chromosomes and Sex-linked Genes. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlova, V. F. & Orlov, N. F. (1969). Chromosome complements and some questions of systematics of lizards of genus Lacerta. Zoologitcheskii Zhurnal 48, 1056–1060.Google Scholar
Pasteur, G. (1977). Endocyclic selection in reptiles. American Naturalist 111, 1027–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasteur, N., Pasteur, G., Britton-Davidian, J., Bonhomme, F. & Catalan, J. (1986). Manuel technique de génétique par électrophorèse des protéines. Paris: Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Peccinini-Seale, D. (1981). New developments in vertebrate cytotaxonomy. IV. Cytogenetic studies in reptiles. Genetica 56, 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieau, C. (1971). Sur la proportion sexuelle chez les embryons de deux Chéloniens (Testudo graeca L. et Emys orbicularis L.) issus d'æufs incubés artificiellement. C. R. Acad. Sci. (D) 272, 3071–3074.Google Scholar
Pilorge, T. (1982). Stratégie adaptative d'une population de montague de Lacerta vivipara. Oikos 39, 206–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilorge, T. & Xavier, F. (1981). Le lézard vivipare (Lacerta vivipara J.) dans la région du Puy-de-Dôme: écologie et stratégie de reproduction. Annales de la Station Biologique de Besse-en-Chandesse 15, 32–59.Google Scholar
Standora, E. A. & Spotila, J. R. (1985). Temperature dependent sex determination in sea turtles. Copeia 1985, 711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar