Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-c8zdz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T20:55:42.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survey of line crosses in a Brown Leghorn flock 1. Egg Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

J. S. S. Blyth  and
J. H. Sang
J. S. S. Blyth
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, 9
J. H. Sang
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, 9
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Six isolate lines of long standing, from the Centre's Brown Leghorn flock, were intermated in all possible directions, providing thirty cross and six pure line samples. Half the birds from each line and reciprocal cross were kept in floor pens and the rest caged in an adjacent battery house.

Sexual maturity, survivors' production to 500 days of age, and November through June egg numbers, all showed two main factors contributing to variations in cross performance: (1) a significant association with parental production levels as measured by mid-parent averages, and (2) an additional hybrid gain. For November to June production in pens, this hybrid gain appeared to approach a constant for the cross groups. Additional sources of variation were present in age at sexual maturity.

The 500-day records for the penned hybrids exceeded the line average by 50 eggs. Caged samples did less well and showed an advantage of only 34 eggs. In this location the hybrid gain for individual groups decreased with increases in mid-parent level.

Egg weight varied negatively with egg numbers only in the upper half of the wide egg-size range. The best layers fell at the lower end of the covariant range for egg size.

The importance of improving closed strains may not have been lessened by the expansion of the hybrid side of the poultry industry, for the pattern of relationships of line and cross production in this flock is consistent enough to justify the inference that the best hybrids come from the best-producing parents.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , November 1960 , pp. 408 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

References

REFERENCES

Blyth, J. S. S. (1952 a). Degenerate inbred lines of Brown Leghorns and their first crosses. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 20, 133–141.Google Scholar
Blyth, J. S. S. (1952 b). Longtime trends in egg production in a closed line of fowls. Proc. roy. Soc. Edinb. B, 65, 52–65.Google Scholar
Greenwood, A. W. & Blyth, J. S. S. (1951). A repeated cross between inbred lines of poultry. J. agric. Sci. 41, 367–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harada, C. (1956). On the relation between commercial characters of parents and their F1 hybrids in the Bombyx silkworm. Proc. int. Genet. Symp., Tokyo and Kyoto, pp. 352–356.Google Scholar
Hazel, L. N. & Lamoreux, W. F. (1947). Heritability, maternal effects and nicking in relation to sexual maturity and body weight in White Leghorns. Poult. Sci. 26, 508–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, S. C. & Bruckner, J. H. (1952). A comparative analysis of purebred and crossbred poultry. Poult. Sci. 31, 1030–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, C. W. & Olsen, M. W. (1938). A test of crossbred chickens, Single Comb White Leghorns and Rhode Island Reds. Poult. Sci. 17, 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, C. W., Gordon, C. D. & Mehrhof, N. R. (1949). Performance of Rhode Island Reds and Light Sussex as compared with that of their F1 and three-way crossbreds. Poult. Sci. 28, 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, I. M. (1955). Buffered genotypes and improvement in egg production. Amer. Nat. 89, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, I. M. (1958). The Genetic Basis of Selection. Wiley.Google Scholar
Maw, A. J. G. (1949). Performance of crosses of certain inbred lines. Poult. Sci. 28, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, R. (1952). Sexual maturity in Brown Leghorns. The interactions of genotype and environment. Proc. roy. Soc. Edinb. B, 64, 445–455.Google Scholar
Warren, D. C. (1942). The crossbreeding of poultry. Tech. Bull. Kans. agric. Exp. Sta. No. 52.Google Scholar
Yao, T. S. (1959). Additive and dominance effects of genes in egg production and 10-week body weight of crossbred chickens. Poult. Sci. 38, 284–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, F. (1947). Analysis of data from all possible reciprocal crosses between a set of parental lines. Heredity, 1, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar