Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-2qt69 Total loading time: 0.411 Render date: 2022-08-17T05:56:26.141Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

A new aglaspidid euarthropod with a six-segmented trunk from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Konservat-Lagerstätte, Morocco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2015

JAVIER ORTEGA-HERNÁNDEZ*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Downing Site, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, UK
PETER VAN ROY*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, PO Box 208109, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
RUDY LEROSEY-AUBRIL
Affiliation:
Division of Earth Sciences, School of Environmental & Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
*
Authors for correspondence: jo314@cam.ac.uk, peter.vanroy@yale.edu
Authors for correspondence: jo314@cam.ac.uk, peter.vanroy@yale.edu

Abstract

A new euarthropod with an uncommon morphology, Brachyaglaspis singularis gen. et sp. nov., is described from the Early Ordovician (middle Floian) Fezouata biota of Morocco. The presence of a pair of postventral plates, widely attached to each other and located under the posterior-most trunk tergite and the base of the tailspine, indicates a phylogenetic relationship with the enigmatic group Aglaspidida. The overall morphology of Brachyaglaspis most closely resembles that of the ‘Ordovician-type’ aglaspidids, more specifically the late Cambrian – Early Ordovician genus Tremaglaspis. However, the presence of a prominent cephalon and only six trunk tergites in the new genus deviates from the organization of all other known aglaspidid species, notably extending the known range of morphological disparity of the group. A taxonomic revision of this euarthropod group indicates that the most accurate name and authorship combination correspond to Aglaspidida Walcott, 1912.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beecher, C. E. 1901. Discovery of eurypterid remains in the Cambrian of Missouri. American Journal of Science 4, 364–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, J. 1968. Eolimulus, a Lower Cambrian xiphosurid from Sweden. Geologiska Föreningens I Stockholm Förhandlingar 90, 489503. doi: 10.1080/11035896809454937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, J. 1971. Paleomerus – merostome or merostomoid. Lethaia 4, 393401. doi: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.1971.tb01862.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G., Bruton, D. L. & Whittington, H. B. 1979. Appendages of the arthropod Aglaspis spinifer (Upper Cambrian, Wisconsin) and their significance. Palaeontology 22, 167–80.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G. & Fortey, R. A. 1982. The cuticle of the aglaspidid arthropods, a red-herring in the early history of the vertebrates. Lethaia 15, 25–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.1982.tb01969.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caster, K. E. & Macke, W. B. 1952. An aglaspid merostome from the Upper Ordovician of Ohio. Journal of Paleontology 26, 753–7.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I. 1965. Xiphosuran merostomes from the Bohemian Ordovician. Sborník Geologickych Ved, Paleontologie 5, 738.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I. 1999. Some problematical arthropods from the Upper Ordovician Letná Formation of Bohemica. Journal of Geosciences 44, 7992.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I. & Havlicek, V. 1965. Kodymirus n.g., a new aglaspid merostome of the Cambrian of Bohemia. Sborník Geologickych Ved, Paleontologie 6, 720.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M. 1900. Merostomata. In Text-book of Paleontology, Volume 1, first edition (eds Eastman, C. R. & von Zittel, K. A.), pp. 669–78. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M. 1913. Merostomata. In Text-book of Paleontology, Volume 1, second edition (eds Eastman, C. R. and von Zittel, K. A.), pp. 771–86. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1852. Crustacea, pt. I. United States exploring expedition during the years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842. Under the command of Charles Wilkes, U.S.N.C. 13. Philadelphia: Sherman, 685 pp.Google Scholar
Destombes, J. 2006. Carte géologique au 1/200000 de l’Anti-Atlas marocain. Paléozoïque inférieur: Cambrien moyen et supérieur – Ordovicien – base du Silurien. Feuille Zagora-Coude du Drâ. – Mémoire explicatif. Notes et Mémoires du Service géologique du Maroc 273, 15.Google Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D., García-Bellido, D. C. & Paterson, J. R. 2011. A new leanchoiliid megacheiran arthropod from the lower Cambrian Emu Bay Shale, South Australia. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56, 385400. doi: 10.4202/app.2010.0080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1974. Revision of the suborder Synziphosurina (Chelicerata, Mersotomata), with remarks on merostome phylogeny. American Museum Novitates 2543, 141.Google Scholar
Fage, L. 1968. Classe des Mérostomacés (Merostomata, Woodward 1866). In Traité de Zoologie, Anatomie, Systématique, Biologie, Tome 6, Onychophores, Tardigrades, Arthropodes, Trilobitomorphes, Chélicérates (ed. Grassé, P. P.), pp. 219–62. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Fedotov, D. 1924. On the relations between the Crustacea, Trilobita, Merostomata, and Arachnida. Bulletin de l’Académie des Sciences de Russie, 6th Series 18, 383408.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 1991. Morphologic patterns of diversification: examples from trilobites. Palaeontology 34, 461–85.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 2009. A new giant asaphid trilobite from the Lower Ordovician of Morocco. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 37, 916.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 2011. Trilobites of the genus Dikelokephalina from Ordovician Gondwana and Avalonia. Geological Journal 46, 405–15.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 2012. The first known complete lichakephalid trilobite, Lower Ordovician of Morocco. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 42, 17. doi: 10.1002/gj.1275.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. & Rushton, A. W. 2003. A new aglaspidid arthropod from the Lower Ordovician of Wales. Palaeontology 46, 1031–8. doi: 10.1111/1475-4983.00331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortey, R. A. & Rushton, A. W. 2009. The Ordovician aglaspidid arthropods Tremaglaspis reconsidered. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 37, 1723.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. & Theron, N. J. 1994. A new Ordovician arthropod, Soomaspis, and the agnostid problem. Palaeontology 37, 841–61.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. R., Briggs, D. E. G., Orr, P. J. & Van Roy, P. 2012. Preservation of giant anomalocaridids in silica-chlorite concretions from the early Ordovician of Morocco. Palaios 27, 317–25. doi: 10.2110/palo.2011.p11-093r.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. 1862. A new crustacean from the Potsdam Sandstone. Canadian Naturalist 7, 443–5.Google Scholar
Harper, D. A. T. 2006. The Ordovician biodiversification: Setting an agenda for marine life. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 232, 148–66. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, K. L. 1928. Critical notes upon some Cambrian arthropods described by Charles D. Walcott. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 86, 120.Google Scholar
Hesselbo, S. P. 1989. The aglaspidid arthropod Beckwithia from the Cambrian of Utah and Wisconsin. Journal of Paleontology 63, 636–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselbo, S. P. 1992. Aglaspidida (Arthropoda) from the upper Cambrian of Wisconsin. Journal of Paleontology 66, 885923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Y.-C. & Niu, S.-W. 1981. Discovery of new marine family Sinaglaspidae (Aglaspidida) in Shanxi Province. Kexue Tongbao 26, 911–4.Google Scholar
Hou, X. G. & Bergström, J. 1997. Arthropods of the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang fauna, southwest China. Fossils and Strata 45, 1116.Google Scholar
Hughes, N. C. 2007. The evolution of trilobite body patterning. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 35, 401–34. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kröger, B. & Lefebvre, B. 2012. Palaeogeography and palaeoecology of early Floian (Early Ordovician) cephalopods from the Upper Fezouata Formation, Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Fossil Record 15, 6175. doi: 10.1002/mmng.201200004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamsdell, J. C. 2013. Revised systematics of Palaeozoic ‘horseshoe crabs’ and the myth of monophyletic Xiphosura. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 167, 127. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00874.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankester, E. R. 1904. The structure and classification of Arthropoda. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 47, 523–82.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, B. & Fatka, O. 2003. Palaeogeographical and palaeoecological aspects of the Cambro-Ordovician radiation of echinoderms in Gondwanan Africa and peri-Gondwanan Europe. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 195, 7397. doi: 10.1016/S0031-0182(03)00303-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, D. A., Sutton, M. D. & Edgecombe, G. D. 2013. Arthropod fossil data increase congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies. Nature Communications 4, 2485. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerosey-Aubril, R., Ortega-Hernández, J., Kier, C. & Bonino, E. 2013. Occurrence of the Ordovician-type aglaspidid Tremaglaspis in the Cambrian Weeks Formation (Utah, USA). Geological Magazine 150, 945–51. doi: 10.1017/S001675681300037X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerosey-Aubril, R., Ortega-Hernández, J. & Zhu, X. J. 2013. The first aglaspidid sensu stricto from the Cambrian of China (Sandu Formation, Guangxi). Geological Magazine 150, 565–71. doi: 10.1017/S0016756812001045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, E. L. O., Pittet, B., Gutiérrez-Marco, J. C., Vannier, J., El Hariri, Kh., Lerosey-Aubril, R., Masrour, M., Nowak, H., Servais, T., Vandenbroucke, T. R. A., Van Roy, P., Vaucher, R. & Lefebvre, B. 2015. The Lower Ordovician Fezouata Konservat-Lagerstätte from Morocco: Age, environment and evolutionary perspectives. Gondwana Research, published online 5 May 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.gr. 2015.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1877. The American Paleozoic Fossils. The author. 334 pp.Google Scholar
Ortega-Hernández, J. 2014. Making sense of ‘lower’ and ‘upper’ stem-group Euarthropoda, with comments on the strict use of the name Arthropoda von Siebold, 1848. Biological Reviews, published online 21 December 2014. doi: 10.1111/brv.12168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Hernández, J., Braddy, S. J., Jago, J. B. & Baillie, P. W. 2010. A new aglaspidid arthropod from the upper Cambrian of Tasmania. Palaeontology 53, 1065–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.00974.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Hernández, J., Braddy, S. J. & Rak, Š. 2010. Trilobite and xiphosuran affinities for putative aglaspidid arthropods Caryon and Drabovaspis, Upper Ordovician, Czech Republic. Lethaia 45, 427–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.2010.00216.x.Google Scholar
Ortega-Hernández, J., Legg, D. A. & Braddy, S. J. 2013. The phylogeny of aglaspidid arthropods and the internal relationships within Artiopoda. Cladistics 29, 1545. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00413.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Hernández, J., Lerosey-Aubril, R., Kier, C. & Bonino, E. 2015. A rare non-trilobite artiopodan from the Guzhangian (Cambrian Series 3) Weeks Formation Konservat Lagerstätte in Utah, USA. Palaeontology 58, 265–76. doi: 10.1111/pala.12136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quilty, P. G. 1972. A Middle Cambrian xiphosuran(?) from western Tasmania. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 106, 21–3.Google Scholar
Raasch, G. O. 1939. Cambrian Merostomata. Geological Society of America, Special Paper no. 16, 146 pp.Google Scholar
Radwański, A. & Roniewicz, P. 1967. Trace fossil Aglaspidichnus sanctacrucensis n. gen., n. sp., a probable resting place of an aglaspid (Xiphosura). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 12, 545–52.Google Scholar
Rak, Š., Bergström, J., Fatka, O. & Budil, P. 2009. The Upper Ordovician arthropod Zonozoe drabowiensis Barrande (Liben and Letná formations, Sandbaian, Barrandian area, Czech Republic). Bulletin of Geosciences 84, 185–8. doi: 10.3140/bull.geosci.1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raw, F. 1957. Origin of chelicerates. Journal of Paleontology 31, 139–92.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1920. The appendages, anatomy, and relationships of trilobites. Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 7, 1169.Google Scholar
Repina, L. N. & Okuneva, O. G. 1969. Cambrian arthropods of the Maritime Territory. Paleontological Journal 3, 95103.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1931. A new Middle Cambrian merostome crustacean. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 79, article 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuchert, C. 1926. Bibliographical memoir of John Mason Clarke. Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 12, 181244.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. 1979. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity II. Early Phanerozoic families and multiple equilibria. Paleobiology 5, 222–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10, 246–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Servais, T., Owen, A. W., Harper, D. A. T., Kröger, B. & Munnecke, A. 2010. The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE): the palaeoecological dimension. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 294, 99119. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.05.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, M. & Selden, P. A. 2012. A restudy of the Burgess Shale (Cambrian) arthropod Emeraldella brocki and reassessment of its affinities. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 10, 361–83. doi: 10.1080/14772019.2011.566634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Størmer, L. 1944. On the relationships and phylogeny of fossils and recent Arachnomorpha. A comparative study of Arachnida, Xiphosura, Eurypterida, Trilobita and other fossil Arthropoda. Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo. I. Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse 5, 1158.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1952. Phylogeny and taxonomy of fossil horseshoe crabs. Journal of Paleontology 26, 630–40.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1955. Merostomata. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part P. Arthropoda 2. (ed. Moore, R. C.), pp. 441. Boulder: Geological Society of America and Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Sumrall, C. D. & Zamora, S. 2011. Ordovician edrioasteroids from Morocco: Faunal exchanges across the Rheic Ocean. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 9, 425454. doi: 10.1080/14772019.2010. 499137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Roy, P. 2006. A new aglaspidid arthropod from the Upper Ordovician of Morocco with remarks on the affinities and limitations of Aglaspidida. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 96, 327–50. doi: 10.1017/S0263593300001334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Roy, P. & Briggs, D. E. G. 2011. A giant Ordovician anomalocaridid. Nature 473, 510–3. doi: 10.1038/nature09920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Roy, P., Briggs, D. E. G. & Gaines, R. R. 2015. The Fezouata fossils of Morocco: an extraordinary record of marine life in the Early Ordovician. Journal of the Geological Society of London, published online 7 July 2015. doi: 10.1144/jgs2015-017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Roy, P., Daley, A. C. & Briggs, D. E. G. 2015. Anomalocaridid trunk limb homology revealed by a giant filter-feeder with paired flaps. Nature 522, 7780. doi:10.1038/nature14256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Roy, P., Orr, P., Botting, J., Muir, L., Vinther, J., Lefevbre, B., El Hariri, Kh. & Briggs, D. E. G. 2010. Ordovician faunas of Burgess Shale type. Nature 465, 215–8. doi: 10.1038/nature09038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vidal, M. 1998a. Le modèle des biofaciès à trilobites: un test dans l’Ordovicien inférieur de l’Anti-Atlas, Maroc. Comptes-rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 327, 327–33.Google Scholar
Vidal, M. 1998b. Trilobites (Asaphidae et Raphiophoridae) de l’Ordovicien inférieur de l’Anti-Atlas, Maroc. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 251, 3977.Google Scholar
Vinther, J., Van Roy, P. & Briggs, D. E. G. 2008. Machaeridians are Palaeozoic armoured annelids. Nature 451, 185–8. doi: 10.1038/nature06474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waggoner, B. 2003. Non-trilobite arthropods from the Silver Peak Range, Nevada. Journal of Paleontology 77, 706–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1911. Middle Cambrian Merostomata. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 57, 1740.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1912. Cambrian geology and paleontology II. Middle Cambrian Branchiopoda, Malacostraca, Trilobita and Merostomata. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 57, 145229.Google Scholar
Walter, O. T. 1925. Trilobites of Iowa and some related Paleozoic forms. Iowa Geological Survey 31, 198–9.Google Scholar
Waterlot, G. 1953. Classe des Mérostomes (Merostomata Woodward 1866). In Traité de Paléontologie, Tome 3, Les Formes Ultimes d’Invertébrés, Onychophores, Arthropodes, Échinodermes, Stomocordés (ed. Piveteau, J.), pp. 529–54. Masson: Paris.Google Scholar
Webby, B. D., Paris, F., Droser, M. L. & Percival, I. G. (eds) 2004. The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event. New York: Columbia University Press, 496 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X.-L. & Shu, D.-G. 2005. A new arthropod from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte, early Cambrian, southern China. Alcheringa 29, 185–94. doi: 10.1080/03115510508619300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A new aglaspidid euarthropod with a six-segmented trunk from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Konservat-Lagerstätte, Morocco
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

A new aglaspidid euarthropod with a six-segmented trunk from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Konservat-Lagerstätte, Morocco
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

A new aglaspidid euarthropod with a six-segmented trunk from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Konservat-Lagerstätte, Morocco
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *