Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:54:41.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emplacement of an epizonal granodiorite pluton λ by vertical block elevation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

E. C. Leitch
E. C. Leitch
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Sydney, N.S.W. 2006, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The Carrai Granodiorite is an intrusive magmatic pluton with steeply dipping margins surrounded by a well-developed contact metamorphic aureole. Emplacement of the body was accompanied by little distortion of neighbouring rocks and involved vertical displacement of pre-existing material. Scarcity of country rock blocks, and the presence of numerous dioritic xenoliths indicate that stoping was unimportant, and the pluton was accommodated in the upper crust by vertical uplift of earlier rocks (‘block elevation’). A close relationship existed between faulting and granodiorite emplacement. Deep shears possibly account for the generation of the linear zone of plutons in which the Granodiorite is located.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 113 , Issue 6 , November 1976 , pp. 553 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bott, M. P. H. & Smithson, S. B. 1967. Gravity investigation of sub-surface shape and mass distributions of granite batholiths. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 78, 859–78.Google Scholar
Brooks, E. R. 1967. Multiple metamorphism along the Grenville Front north of Georgian Bay, Ontario. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 78, 1267–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buddington, A. F. 1959. Granite emplacement with special reference to North America. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 70, 671–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbing, E. J. & Pitcher, W. S. 1972. The Coastal Batholith of Peru. Jl. geol. Soc. 128, 421–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, W. B. 1971. Tectonic transpression in Caledonian Spitsbergen. Geol. Mag. 108, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitch, E. C. 1974. The geological development of the southern part of the New England Fold belt. Jl geol. Soc. Austr. 21, 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, R. B. 1969. The association of granites with zones of stress and shearing. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 80, 115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitcher, W. S. & Read, H. H. 1963. Contact metamorphism in relation to manner of emplacement of the granites of Donegal, Ireland. Jl Geol. 41, 261–96.Google Scholar
Ramberg, H. 1970. Model studies in relation to intrustion of plutonic bodies. In Newall, G. & Rast, N. (Eds): Mechanism of igneous intrusion, pp. 261–86. Liverpool Geological Society.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. & Watson, J. 1959. Metamorphism in deep-seated zones of transcurrent movement at Kungwe Bay, Tanganyika Territory. Jl Geol. 67, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taubeneck, W. H. 1957. Geology of the Elkorn Mountains, Northeastern Oregon: Bald Mountain Batholith. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 98, 181–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, F. J. 1968. Metamophic petrology. 403 pp. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Tuttle, O. F. 1952. Origin of the contrasting mineralogy of extrusive and plutonic salic rocks. Jl Geol. 60, 107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, A. J. R., Chappell, B. W. & Cleary, J. R. 1974. Geologic setting and emplacement of some Australian Paleozoic Batholiths and implications for intrusive mechanisms. Pacific Geol. 8, 159–71.Google Scholar