Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T01:15:06.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The English Lake District batholith – Ordovician, Silurian, Devonian or…?

Correspondence and Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. J. Firman  and
M. K. Lee
R. J. Firman
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.
M. K. Lee
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, U.K.18 may 1987
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence and Notes
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 124 , Issue 6 , November 1987 , pp. 585 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

References

Bott, M. H. P. 1974. The geological interpretation of a gravity survey of the English Lake District and the Vale of Eden. Journal of the Geological Society of London 130, 309–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, K. C. 1986. Geology in the real world. In Geology in the Real World – the Kingsley Dunham Volume (eds Nesbitt, R.W. Nicholl, I.), pp. 1–10. London: The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy.Google Scholar
Firman, R. J. 1960. The relationship between joints and faults in the Eskdale Granite (Cumberland) and the adjacent Borrowdale Volcanic Series. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 116, 317–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firman, R. J. & Lee, M. K. 1986. Age and structure of the concealed English Lake District batholith and its probable influence on subsequent sedimentation, tectonics and mineralisation. In Geology in the Real World–the Kingsley Dunham Volume (eds Nesbitt, R.W. Nicholl, I.), pp. 117–27. London: The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy.Google Scholar
Lee, M. K. 1984. The three dimensional form of the Lake District granite batholith. Report in series: Investigation of the Geothermal Potential of the UK. British Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Lee, M. K. 1986. A new gravity survey of the Lake District and a three dimensional model of the granite batholith. Journal of the Geological Society of London 143, 425–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, C., Plant, J. A., Simpson, P. R. & Tarney, J., 1985. The geochemistry, metasomatism and petrogenesis of the granites of the English Lake District. Journal of the Geological Society of London 142, 1139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, C. C. 1979. Ordovician intrusions of the English Lake District. Journal of the Geological Society of London 136, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, C. C. 1981. The significance of isotopic dates from the English Lake District. Journal of the Geological Society of London 138, 569–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snelling, N. J. (ed.) 1985. The Chronology of the Geological Record. Geological Society of London Memoir, Number 10.Google Scholar
Soper, N. J. & Moseley, F. 1978. Structure. In The Geology of the Lake District (ed. Moseley, F.), pp. 45–67. Yorkshire Geological Society, Occasional Publication No. 3.Google Scholar