We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The second fundamental problem of petrogenesis is the following question:—By what processes have there been derived, from the original magma or magmas, all other magmas known as igneous rocks? It is now almost universally admitted that many igneous rocks are genetically connected and produced from an original magma by differentiation, and that in many cases differentiation may be considered as liquation or separating into secondary magmas. But is differentiation (Spaltungen) alone sufficient to explain the formation of all igneous rocks? And by what is a magma stimulated to differentiation? These are two questions which must be elucidated. It must be first of all emphasized that not every magma is subject to differentiation. My standpoint is that the principal factors producing and regulating differentiation are on one side the process of crystallization (differentiation by crystallization, Krystallizations-differenzierung), and on the other the chemical composition of the magma and its tendency to the formation of eutectics (magmatic differentiation).
page 289 note 1 Lœwinson-Lessing, F., “Petrographical Notices. 4. Differentiation, Eutectics, and Entropy”: Ann. Inst. Polyt. St. Pétersbourg, vi, p. 279, 1906.Google Scholar
page 290 note 1 Harker, A., “The Tertiary Igneous Rocks of Skye”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1904.Google Scholar Natural History of Igneous Rocks, p. 356.Google Scholar It must be remembered of course that Harker considers such cases as exceptional, and is an adversary of assimilation on a large scale.
page 290 note 2 Daly, R., “The Origin of Augite Andesite and of related Ultra-basic Rocks”: Jour. Geol., 1908, p. 401.Google Scholar
page 290 note 3 Daly, R., “Secondary Origin of certain Granites”: Amer. Jour. Sci., xx (4), p. 185, 1905.Google Scholar
page 290 note 4 Daly, R., CM. пpиM. иa CTP., 123.Google Scholar
page 290 note 5 Becke, F., “Die Eruptivgesteine des böhmischen Mittelgebirges u. d. Amerik. Anden. Atlantische a. pazifische Sippe der Eruptivgesteine”: T.M.P.M., xxii, p. 209, 1903.Google Scholar
page 290 note 6 Suess, E., Das Antlitz der Erde, iii, ii, 679, 1909.Google Scholar
page 291 note 1 Klemm, G., “Beobachtungen über die genetischen Bezielnmgen der Odenwälder Gabbros und Diorite”: Notizbl. Ver. Erdkunde Grosh. geol. Landesanstalt Darmstadt (4), xxvii, 1906.Google Scholar
page 291 note 2 Adams, F., “On the Origin of the Amphibolites of the Laurentian Area of Canada”: Jour. Geol., xvii, p. 7, 1909.Google Scholar
page 291 note 3 Haug, E., Traité de Géologie.Google Scholar
page 291 note 4 Philipp, H., “Vorläufige Mittheilungen über Resorptions- und Injectionserscheinungen im südl. Schwarzwald”: Centrbl. Min., 1907, p. 76.Google Scholar
page 291 note 5 Termier, E., “Sur le granite alcalin du Filfla (Algérie)”: C. R., 1902.Google Scholar
page 291 note 6 Munteanu-Murgoci, , Ueber die Einschliisse von Granat-Vesuvianfels in dem Serpentin des Paringu-Massivs, 1901.Google Scholar
page 291 note 7 Mackie, , “On Differences in Chemical Composition between the Central and the Marginal Zones of Granite Veins, with further evidence of exchanges between such veins and contact rocks”: Trans. Edinb. Geol. Soc, viii, p. 98, 1901.Google Scholar
page 291 note 8 Sauer, A., “Ueber petrographische Studien an den Lavabomben aus dem Ries“: Jahresh. Ver. vaterl. Nat. Württemb., lvii, 1901.Google Scholar
page 291 note 9 Michel-Lévy, A., Mémoire sur le porphyre bleu de I'Esterel, 1897.Google Scholar
page 291 note 10 Lacroix, A., Guide des excursions, Congrès de Paris, 1900.Google Scholar
page 291 note 11 Lemberg, J., Z. d. g. G., 1872.Google Scholar
page 291 note 12 Doelter, C., “Chemisehe Zusammensetzung u. Genesis der Monzoni-Gesteine”: T.M.P.M., 1902, p. 206.Google Scholar
page 291 note 13 Gürieh, , “Granit u. Gneiss”: Himmel u. Erde, xvii, p. 6, 1905.Google Scholar
page 291 note 14 Högbom, A., “Pre-Cambrian Geology of Sweden”: Bull. Geol. Inst. Upsala, x, 1910.Google Scholar
page 291 note 15 Hugi, , “Vorläufige Mitteilung über Untersuchungen in der nördlichen Gneiszone des zentralen Aarmassivs”: Eclogsæ Geol. Helvet., ix, No. 4, 1907.Google Scholar
page 291 note 16 Sollas, , Trans. Roy. Ir. Acad., xxx, p. 505, 1894.Google Scholar
page 291 note 17 Cole, Grenville, Sci. Trans. Roy. Dublin Soc. (2), vi, p. 246, 1897.Google Scholar The last two authors are cited after Harker, , Natural History of Igneous Rocks, p. 338.Google Scholar
page 291 note 18 Sederholm, J., “Om Granit och Gneiss”: Bull. Com. Géol. Finlande, No. 3, 1907.Google Scholar
page 292 note 1 Brögger, W., Die Eruptivgesteine des Kristianiagebiets. III. Das Ganggefolge des Laurdalits. 1898.Google Scholar
page 292 note 2 Læwinson-Lessing, F., “Etudes de pétrographie générale, avec un mémoire sur les roehes éruptives d'une partie du Caucase Central”, p. 178: Trans. Soc. Nat. St. Pétersbourg, 1898.Google Scholar “Studien über die Eruptivgesteine”, p. 187: Compt. rend. VII Congr. Géol., 1899.Google Scholar See also the Proceedings of the Congress of St. Petersburg, p. elviii.
page 292 note 3 Læwinson-Lessing, F., “Petrographical Notices. 3. Is there a difference in the chemical composition of the intrusive and the effusive rocks?”: Ann. Inst. Polyt. St. Pétersb., vi, p. 274, 1906.Google Scholar
page 292 note 4 “Differentiation, Eutecties, and Entropy”: loc. cit.
page 293 note 1 Daly, E., “Origin of the Alkaline Rocks”: Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., xxi, p. 117, 1910.Google Scholar
page 293 note 2 Læwinson-Lessing, F., Studien üher die Eruptivgesteine, p. 188.Google Scholar
page 293 note 3 Ibid., p. 183.
page 293 note 4 Læwinson-Lessing, F., “Kritische Beiträge zur Systematik der Eruptivgesteine: I. Zur Chemie der Magmen”: T.M.P.M., xix, p. 299, 1900.Google Scholar
page 293 note 5 “Studien über die Eruptivgesteine.”
page 293 note 6 Schweig, M., “Untersuchungen über die Differentiation der Magmen”: N.J., Beil. Bd., xvii, p. 516, 1903.Google Scholar
page 295 note 1 Sederholm, J., “Om Granit och Gneiss”: Bull. Comm. Géol. Finlande, No. 23, 1907.Google Scholar
page 296 note 1 Sederholm, J., “Om Granit och Gneiss”: Bull. Comm. Géol. Finlande, No. 23, 1907.Google Scholar
page 296 note 2 Lukaschewitch, O., The Inorganic Life of the Earth. Part II, The Life of the Rocks. St. Petersburg, 1909.Google Scholar
page 296 note 3 Branca, , Centralbl. f. Mineral., 1909, p. 135.Google Scholar
page 296 note 4 Haug, E., Traité de Gélogie.Google Scholar
page 296 note 5 Cited by Lacroix, , Mont Pelée, ii, p. 56.Google Scholar
page 296 note 6 Dutton, , The High Plateaux of Utah, 1880, p. 125.Google Scholar
page 296 note 7 Schwarz, E., “Hot Springs”: GEOL. MAG., 1907, No. 480, p. 258.Google Scholar
page 296 note 8 Delesse, , Etudes sur le métamorphisme, 1862, pp. 157–220.Google Scholar
page 297 note 1 Hunt, Sterry, “The Origin of the Crystalline Rocks”: Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, ii, p. 3, 1884.Google Scholar
