Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:58:21.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marsupiocrinidae of the Laurel Limestone of southeastern Indiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

T. Frest*
Affiliation:
Indiana University NorthwestGaryIndiana 46408U.S.A

Summary

Three new species of Marsupiocrinus are described from the basal Wenlock Laurel Limestone of southeastern Indiana. Although the earliest representatives of the genus yet known, they display fully the specialized characters peculiar to it. Two new subgenera of Marsupiocrinus are erected on the basis of arm structure and cup shape.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelin, N. P. 1878. Iconographia crinoideorum in stratis Sueciae siluricis fossilium. iv+62 pp., 29 pls. Holmiae.Google Scholar
Austin, T. & Austin, T. Jr., 1842. Proposed arrangement of the Echinodermata, particularly as regards the Crinoidea, and a subdivision of the class Adelostella (Echnidae). Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 1st ser. 10, 106–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1915. Bibliographic index of American Ordovician and Silurian fossils. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. 92, viii+1521 pp.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. & Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Palaeozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Am. 45, vi+733 pp.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1889. Note on Marsupites testudenarius von Schlotheim sp. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 45, 172–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1900. The echinoderma. In: Lankester, E. R. A Treatise on Zoology, 3, vi+344 pp. London.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1973. Crinoids from the Girardeau Limestone (Ordovician). Palaeontographica Americana 7 (46), 263499, pls. 59–79.Google Scholar
Cuenot, L. 1948. Classe des Crinoides. In: Grasse, Pierre-P. (Ed.). Traité de Zoologie. pp. 3174, text-figs 38–98. Paris.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1898. A report on the Niagara limestone quarries of Decatur, Franklin, & Fayette counties, with remarks on the geology of the middle and upper Silurian rocks of these and neighboring counties. Rep. Indiana Dept. geol. & nat. Resour. 22, 195255.Google Scholar
Frest, T. & Paul, C. R. C. 1971. Callocystites brevis, a new Silurian rhombiferan cystoid from Indiana. Geol. Mag. 108, 425–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabau, A. W. & Shimer, H. W. 1910. North American Index Fossils. Invertebrates. II. Conularida—Echinoidea. xiv+909 pp., figs 1211–1937. New York.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1918. Phylogenie und System der Pelmatozoen. Paläont. Zeit. 3, 128 pp. 114 figs.Google Scholar
McCoy, F. 1854. Description of the British Palaeozoic Fossils in the Geological Museum of the University of Cambridge. 661 pp., pls 1 A—L, 2A—D, 3 A—K. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. & Worthen, A. H. 1865. Descriptions of New Crinoidea, &c., from the Carboniferous Rocks of Illinois and some of the adjoining States. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia 1865, 155–66.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A Natural History of the Crinoidea, or Lily-shaped Animals. 150 pp, 50 pls. Bristol.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1892. Palaeontology. Annual Rept. geol. Surv. Indiana 17, 611705, 20 pls. Advance publication (1891), 103 pp., 20 pls.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1894. Palaeontology. Annual Rep. geol Surv. Indiana 18, 257306, 12 pls. Advance publication (1892), 79 pp., 12 pls.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1952, Crinoids. In: Moore, R. C. et al. Invertebrate Fossils. pp. 604–52, 34 figs. New York.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. & Laudon, L. R. 1943. Evolution and Classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Am. 46, 167 pp., 14 pls.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. & Laudon, L. R. 1944. Class Crinoidea. In: Shimer, H. W. & Shrock, R. R. (ed.) Index Fossils of North America. pp. 137209, pls 52–79. New York.Google Scholar
Morris, J. 1843. A Catalogue of British Fossils. Comprising all the genera and species hitherto described. 222 pp. London.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1839. In: Murchison, R. I. The Silurian system. pp. 670–5, pls 17–18. London.Google Scholar
Pinsak, A. P. & Shaver, R. H. 1964. The Silurian formations of northern Indiana. Bull. Indiana Dept. Conserv. geol. Surv. 32, 87 pp.Google Scholar
Shumard, B. F. 1866. A catalogue of the Palaeozoic fossils of North America. Trans. Acad. Sci. St Louis 2 (2), 334407.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1913. Crinoidea. In: Eastman, C. R. (Ed.): Textbook of Palaeontology I, pp. 173243, figs 267–346. London.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1926. American Silurian Crinoids. Pub. Smithsonian Inst. 2871, vi+236 pp., 33 pls.Google Scholar
Tasch, P. 1973. Paleobiology of the Invertebrates. xxxv+946 pp., figs. New York.Google Scholar
Troost, G. 1849. A List of the Fossil Crinoids of Tennessee. Proc. Am. Ass. Advmt Sci. 2, 5962.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1953. Classe de Crinoldes. In: Piveteau, J. (Ed.): Traité de Paleontologie, pp. 658773, 166 figs. Paris.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. & Springer, F. 1881. Revision of the Palaecrinoidea, pt 2, Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Phil. 1881, 177411, pls. 17–19.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. & Springer, F. 1886. Revision of the Palaecrinoidea, pt. 3. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Phil. 1886, 226360, 64227, pls 4–9.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. & Springer, F. 1897. The North American Crinoidea Camerata. Mem. Harvard Mus. Comparative Zoology 20, 21, 897 pp., 83 pls., 23 text-figs.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1973. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1943–1968. Mem. geol. Soc. Am. 137, xi+341 pp.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1900. The Paleontology of the Niagaran Limestone in the Chicago Area. The Crinoidea. Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci. 4 (1), 153 pp., 15 pls.Google Scholar
Wood, E. 1909. A critical summary of Troost's unpublished manuscript on the crinoids of Tennessee. Bull. U.S. nat. Mus. 64, xi+150 pp., 15 pls.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1879. Handbuch der Palaeontologie, I Protozoa, Coelenterata, Echinodermata und Molluscoidea. viii+ 765 pp. München and Leipzig.Google Scholar