Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T22:03:02.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Sequence of Microspore Assemblages Associated with the Occurrence of Crassidurite in Coal Seams of Yorkshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A. H. V. Smith
Affiliation:
National Coal Board, 14 Endcliffe Avenue, Sheffield, 10.

Abstract

An investigation of the sequence of microspores vertically within a number of seams containing horizons of crassidurite has revealed a succession of three distinct phases, each characterized in the main by the dominance of one of the three genera Lycospora, Laevigato-sporites, and Densosporites, The succession begins with the Lycospore phase and culminates in the crassidurite with the Densospore phase. The significance of this succession in relation to the formation of crassidurite and the provenance of Densospores is discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramski, C., Mackowsky, M. Th., Mantel, W., and Stach, E., 1951. Atlas für Angewandte Steinkohlenpetrographie. Glückauf, Essen.Google Scholar
Berry, W., 1937. Spores from the Pennington Coal, Rhea County, Tennessee. Amer. Mid. Nat., xviii, 155160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddy, R. G. H. B., 1938. The Mode of Deposition of Coal Seams: A Microscopic Study. Trans. Instn. Min. Engrs., xcvi, 100–8, 121–3.Google Scholar
Butterworth, M. A., and Millott, J. O'N., 1956. The Correlation by microspores of certain seams at Bradford and Wheatsheaf collieries and in the Prestwich Boreholes. Trans. Instn. Min. Engrs., cxvi, 3–19.Google Scholar
Butterworth, M. A. and Williams, R. W., 1954. Descriptions of Nine Species of Small Spores from the British Coal Measures. Annals and Mag. Nat. Hist., vii, 753764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, G. W., and Leighton, L. H., 1956. The Coal Survey in Yorkshire—A Review, 1956. Trans. Instn. Min. Engrs., cxvi, 887918.Google Scholar
Gano, L., 1917. A Study in Physiographic Ecology in Northern Florida. Bot. Gaz., lxiii, 337372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, H. P., 1949. Pollen Content of Moss Polsters in relation to Forest composition. Amer. Mid. Nat., xlii, 473–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, E., 1933. Neue Erkenntnisse über die Vorgange der Flozbildung. Bergbau, 89.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, A. C., 1932. Beschreibung von Sporenformen aus Floz Agir: In Potonié R. Sporenformen aus dem Flozen Agir und Bismark Ruhrgebietes. Neues Jahrb, Beil-Bd., lxvii, Abt. B, 447–9.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, A. C., 1933. Sporenformen des Aegirhorizonts des Ruhr-Reviers: Dissertation, Berlin.Google Scholar
Karmasin, K. von, 1952. Deutung des Fazieswechsels in dem Flozen Erda und Agir auf Grund mikropetrographischer Schlitzprobenunter-suchungen. Bergbau-Archiv, xiii, 74100.Google Scholar
Knox, E. M., 1942. Microspores in some coals of the Productive Coal Measures in Fife. Trans. Instn. Min. Engrs., ci, 98112.Google Scholar
Knox, E. M., 1950. The Spores of Lycopodium, Phylloglossum, Selaginella, and Isoetes and their value in the study of microfossils of Palaeozoic age. Trans. Bot. Soc. Edin., xxxv, 211357.Google Scholar
Kosanke, R. M., 1950. Pennsylvanian spores of Illinois and their use in Correlation. Urbana, Illinois, State Geol. Surv. Bull., lxxiv, 1128.Google Scholar
Kremp, G., 1952. Sporen-Vergesellschaftungen und Mikrofaunen-Horizonte im Ruhrkarbon. C.R. Congr. Strat. Carb. Heerlen, 1, 347357.Google Scholar
Loose, F., 1932. Beschriebung von Sporenformen aus Floz Bismark: In Potonié, R. Sporenformen aus dem Flozen Agir und Bismark Ruhrgebietes. Neues Jahrb., Beil-Bd., lxvii, Abt. B., 449452.Google Scholar
Millott, J. O'N., 1939. The Microspores in the Coal Seams of North Staffordshire. Pt. 1. The Millstone Grit—Ten Foot Coals. Trans. Instn. Min. Engrs., xcvi, 317340.Google Scholar
Potonié, R., 1952. Die Bedeutung der Sporomorphen für die Gesellschafts-geschichte. C.R. Congr. Strat. Carb., Heerlen, ii, 501–6.Google Scholar
Potonié, R., 1955. Zur Biologie der Karbonischen Sporen. Pal. Zeit., xxix, 2732.Google Scholar
Potonié, R., and Kremp, G., 1954. Die Gattungen der paläozoischen Sporae dispersae und ihre Stratigraphie. Geol. Jarhb., lxix, 111193.Google Scholar
Potonié, R., and Kremp, G., 1956. Die Sporae dispersae des Ruhrkarbons. Palaeontographica Abt. B., xcviii, 1136, and xcix, 85191.Google Scholar
Raistrick, A., and Marshall, C. E., 1939. The Nature and Origin of Coal Seams. London.Google Scholar
Reed, F. D., 1938. Notes on some plant remains from the Carboniferous of Illinois. Bot. Gaz., c, 324335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopf, J. M., 1952. Was Decay important in Origin of Coal ? Journ. Sed. Petrol, xxii, 61–9.Google Scholar
Schopf, J. M. Wilson, L. R., and Bentall, R., 1944. An Annotated Synopsis of Palaeozoic Fossil Spores and the Definition of Generic Groups. Illinois Geol. Surv. Rept. Inv., xci, 166.Google Scholar
Stach, E., 1952. Die Vitrit-Durit Mischungen in der Petrographischen Kohlenanalyse. Brenn. Chem., xxxiii, 361370.Google Scholar
Stach, E., 1955. Crassidurain—A means of Seam Correlation in the Carboniferous Coal Measures of the Ruhr. Fuel, xxxiv, 95117.Google Scholar
Teichmuller, M., 1950. Zum petrographischen Aufbau und Werdegang der Weichbraunkohle. Geol. Jahrb., lxiv, 429488.Google Scholar
Teichmuller, M., 1952. Vergleichende mikroskopische Untersuchungen versteinerten Torfe des Ruhrkarbons und der daraus entstandenen Steinkohlen. C.R. Congr. Strat. Carb. Heerlen, ii, 607613.Google Scholar
Thomson, P. W., 1950. Grundsätzliches zur tertiaren Pollen-und Sporen-mikrostratigraphie auf Grund einer Untersuchung des Hauptflozes der rheinischen Braunkohle in Liblar, Neurath, Fortuna und Bruhl. Geol. Jahrb., lxv, 113126.Google Scholar
Timofeyev, P. P., 1955. Conditions of formation of genetic types of coals and their connection with cycles or sedimentational environment in the Donbass. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR., cii, 809812.Google Scholar
Weiss, F. E., 1925. Plant Structure and environment with reference to Fossil Plants. J. Ecology, xiii, 301313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, L. R., and Coe, E. A., 1940. Descriptions of some unassigned plant microfossils from the Des Moines Series of Iowa. Amer. Mid. Nat., xxiii, 182–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zetsche, F., and Kalin, O., 1932. Eine Methode zur Isolierung des Polymer-bitumens (Sporenmembranen, Kutikulen usw.) aus Kohlen. Braunkohle, xxxi, 345363.Google Scholar