Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T15:35:33.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

V.—The Fossil Insects of North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Samuel H. Scudder
Affiliation:
Curator of the Museum of the Boston Society of Natural History, U.S..

Extract

Some years ago, Dr. Dawson, who has himself been very successful in the discovery of insect-remains, described and figured fragments of a species of myriapod under the name of Xylobius sigillaria. The remains, many of which occurred in coprolites of reptiles, were obtained at the Joggins, in upright Sigillaria trees, between coal-groups fourteen and fifteen of division four in Dr. Dawson's detailed section of the Nova Scotia formations. As his descriptions of the animal and its mode of occurrence are easily accessible to English geologists, it is needless to refer to them more explicitly. The coprolites, however, yielded some true insect remains; these, as well as fragments of insects, not coprolitio, were kindly sent me for examination by Dr. Dawson. They consist almost entirely of crushed and indeterminate masses of chitinous matter; the few detached and connected abdominal segments which can be distinguished in variably show that the abdomen was slender and the insect of medium size. Beyond this, little can be said of them. I noticed, however, two remains of eyes; one crushed, distorted, and ill-defined, the other, the beautiful fragment mentioned by Dr. Dawson, whose original size it is difficult to determine. The facets are large and regularly disposed, somewhat resembling the Perlidœ; but the proportion of the eye to the body varies so much in insects that it is impossible to judge of the size of the animal to which this fragment belonged. A few articulations of an antenna are seen on one of the stones; they probably belonged to a very small or very young cockroach. All the remains of insects appear to be neuropterous or orthopterous. I believe I have distinguished five different kinds. There were also two leeches belonging to distinct genera.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1868

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 216 note 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. xvi. pp. 271–3; vol. xviii. p. 6;Google Scholar Can. Nat. vol viii. pp. 280, 283, pl. vi. figs. 57–61;Google Scholar Air-breathers of the Coal Period, pp. 63, 64, 67, pl. vi., figs. 57–61, 8vo., Montreal, 1863;Google Scholar Acadian Geology, Suppl., p. 36, fig. 45, 18mo., Edinburgh, 18551860.Google Scholar

page 216 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. xxii. p. 116.Google Scholar

page 216 note 3 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. ix. pp.5863; vol. xvi. pp. 269–70;Google Scholar Acadian Geology, p. 161, Suppl. p. 33.Google Scholar

page 216 note 4 See also Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. xviii. p, 6.Google Scholar

page 216 note 5 From Coal Groups 7 and 9 of div. 4; Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond. vol. xxii. pp. 113, 114.Google Scholar

page 216 note 6 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. xviii. p. 6;Google Scholar Can. Nat. vol. viii. p. 276, pl. vi. fig. 56;Google Scholar Air-breathers of the Coal Period, p. 59, pl. vi. fig. 56.Google Scholar

page 216 note 7 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. xviii. p. 5.Google Scholar

page 217 note 1 Meek and Worthen. Proc. Acad. Natural. Sc. Philad. 1865, pp. 41–2.Google Scholar

page 217 note 2 Sill. Amer. Journ. Sc. and Arts [2] xxxvii. p. 34.Google Scholar

page 217 note 3 Sill. Amer. Journ. Sc. and Arts [2] xl. p. 268.Google Scholar

page 217 note 4 Memoirs Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. vol. i. pp. 173–92, pl. vi.Google Scholar

page 218 note 1 Geological Survey of Illinois, vol. ii. p. 409–10, pl. 32, figs. 1, 1a, 3. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. Philad., 1865, p. 51–3.Google Scholar

page 218 note 2 Ichnology of Massachusetts, pp. 7, pl. vii., figs. 3 and 4.Google Scholar

page 220 note 1 Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. History, vol. x., pp. 305–6, vol. xi., pp. 117–8;Google Scholar American Naturalist, vol. i., p. 56;Google Scholar Hollister; The Mines of Colorado, pp. 378–87, 12mo. Springfield, 1867.Google Scholar

page 220 note 2 Hollister, Mines of Colorado, p. 383.Google Scholar