In his letter to the Editor, inserted in the last Number of this Magazine (p.332), Mr. Mallet says he is “compelled to repeat” the statements he had persistently made, and I had more than once denied, as to my having, “in almost all my writings,” upheld “the moribund thin crust and liquid nucleus theroy”and “ Hopkins's fiery lakes.” He defends himself from the charge of having “misapprehended,” as was suggested in an Editorial foot-note to his paper, or, as I more truly phrased it, “misrepresented,” my views on these subjects, refusing to be bound by what I may have “written in the scattered magazine articles ” to which he was referred, on the plea that “an author's notions are usually gathered from his acknowleged systematic works.”