No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
“Flexible, You Say. Doesn't Sound Like Property to Me”: A Comment on William H. Clune+
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- German Law Journal , Volume 12 , Issue 1: Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate—Republication [with a new Introduction] Twenty-Five Years Later — , 01 January 2011 , pp. 206 - 209
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2011 by German Law Journal GbR
References
1 Teubner, Gunther, Juridification - Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions, in Jurification of Social Spheres, 3 (Teubner, G., ed., 1987).Google Scholar
2 Habermas, Jürgen, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Vol 2., 522 (1981).Google Scholar
3 Mayntz, Renate, Implementation von Regulativer Politik, in Implementation Politischer Programme II, 50 (Mayntz, Renate ed., 1981).Google Scholar
4 In this sense now, see Richard Posner, The Decline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline 1962-1987, 100 Harv. L. Rev. 761 (1987).Google Scholar
5 See, instead of many others, Autopoietic Law. A New Approach to Law and Society, (Teubner, Gunther ed., 1988).Google Scholar
6 See Priest, G.L., The Intervention of Enterprise Liability: A Critical History of the Intellectual Foundations of Modern Tort Law, 14 J. Legal Stud. 461 (1985).Google Scholar
7 See, on Germany's case law revolution: J.P. Dawson, The Oracles of the Law, 2 (1968).Google Scholar
8 East Germany, by contrast, took the path of re-codifying the civil law. The currently valid law is the Zivilgesetzbuch der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik of June 19, 1975.Google Scholar
9 See the New Jersey decisions Beshada v. Johns Manville, 447 A.2d 539 (1982); Feldman v. Lederle Laboratories, 479 A.2d 374 (1984).Google Scholar
10 See Peter Behrens, Die ökonomischen Grundlagen des Rechts (1986).Google Scholar
You have
Access