¹ G.A Res. 71/1, para. 24 New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants Statement of Financial Implications (Sept. 16, 2016).Google Scholar

² Id. para. 2.Google Scholar

³ Indeed, the development framework might be criticised as appearing to focus on movement of people from poorer to richer countries rather than a more balanced perspective of the movement of people across borders generally. Smith, Adrian A., Migration, Development and Security within Racialised Global Capitalism: Refusing the Balance Game, 37 Third World Q. 2119–38 (2016).Google Scholar

⁴ See Guild, Elspeth & Grant, Stefanie, Migration Governance in the UN: What is the Global Compact and What Does It Mean? (2017).Google Scholar

⁵ See Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Secretary-General Appoints Louise Arbour of Canada Special Representative for International Migration, United Nations (Mar. 9, 2017), http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/partners/srsg.shtml (last visited Oct. 25, 2017).Google Scholar

⁶ See Guild, Elspeth, Stefanie Grant & Kees Groenendijk, IOM and the UN: Unfinished Business (2017).Google Scholar

⁷ Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, July 28, 1951, 189 U. N.T.S. 137; Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, Jan. 31, 1967, 606 U.N.T.S. 267.Google Scholar

⁸ See Türk, Volker & Madeline Garlick, From Burdens and Responsibilities to Opportunities: The Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework and a Global Compact on Refugees, 28 Int'l J. Refugee L. 656–78 (2016).Google Scholar

⁹ See Walters, William, Border/Control, in An Anthology of Migration and Social Transformation 151–65 (2016).Google Scholar

¹⁰ See UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), CCPR General Comment No. 15: The Position of Aliens Under the Covenant, (Apr. 11, 1986), http://www.refworld.org/docid/45139acfc.html.Google Scholar

¹¹ G.A Res. 71/1, para. 24 New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants Statement of Financial Implications (Sept. 16, 2016).Google Scholar

¹² See UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), General Comment No. 31 [80], The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13 (May 26, 2004), http://www.refworld.org/docid/478b26ae2.html.Google Scholar

¹³ G.A Res. 71/1, para. 5 New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants Statement of Financial Implications (Sept. 16, 2016).Google Scholar

¹⁴ Gerhard von Glahn & James Larry Taulbee, Law Among Nations: An Introduction to Public International Law (2015).Google Scholar

¹⁵ The categorization of people as “illegal” has been deplored by the UN and many other institutions but remains current in the language used by numerous states.Google Scholar

¹⁶ See Carens, Joseph H., The Rights of Irregular Migrants, 22 Ethics & Int'l Affairs 163 (2008).Google Scholar

¹⁷ See Dauvergne, Catherine, Making People Illegal: What Globalization Means for Migration and Law (2008).Google Scholar

¹⁸ See Adrian Little & Nick Vaughan-Williams, Stopping Boats, Saving Lives, Securing Subjects: Humanitarian Borders in Europe and Australia, 23 Eur. J. Int'l Rel. 533 (2016).Google Scholar

¹⁹ See Release, Press, World Tourism Organization UNWTO, UNWTO Welcomes the World's One-Billionth Tourist (Dec. 13, 2012), http://media.unwto.org/search/node/who%20is%20a%20tourist%3F.Google Scholar

²⁰ See De, Nicholas P. Genova, Migrant “illegality” and Deportability in Everyday Life, 31 Ann. Rev. Anthropology 419 (2002).Google Scholar

²¹ See Migration and Human Rights, United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Migration/Pages/MigrationAndHumanRightsIndex.aspx (last visited April 10, 2017).Google Scholar

²² See Andrew Becker & G.W. Schulz, Despite ‘Zero-Tolerance’ Policy, Many Who Cross Border Are Repeat Offenders, Reveal (May 23, 2013), https://www.revealnews.org/article/despite-zero-tolerance-policy-many-who-cross-border-are-repeat-offenders/ (last visited Oct. 29, 2017).Google Scholar

²³ See Andrew Geddes & Peter Schölten, The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe (2016).Google Scholar

²⁴ See Arcarazo, Diego Acosta, When Humans Become Migrants: Study of the European Court of Human Rights with an Inter-American Counterpoint 65–66 (2016).Google Scholar

²⁵ See Christina Oelgemöller, “Transit” and “Suspension”: Migration Management or the Metamorphosis of Asylum-Seekers into “Illegal” Immigrants, 37 J. Ethnic & Migration Stud. 407 (2011).Google Scholar

²⁶ Except those so unfortunate as to be stateless. See Jane McAdam, “Disappearing States”, Statelessness and the Boundaries of International law (2010).Google Scholar

²⁷ G.A Res. 71/1, para. 5 New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants Statement of Financial Implications (Sept. 16, 2016).Google Scholar

²⁸ See Five Main Citizenships for First Time Asylum Applicants, 4th Quarter 2016, Eurostat, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/images/4/49/Five_main_citizenships_of_first_time_asylum_applicants%2C_4th_quarter_2016.png (last visited Apr. 11, 2017).Google Scholar

²⁹ http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Asylum_quarterly_report accessed 4 November 2017.Google Scholar

³⁰ See Sei-hill Kim et al., The View of the Border: News Framing of the Definition, Causes, and Solutions to Illegal Immigration, 14 Mass Comm. & Soc. 292 (2011).Google Scholar

³¹ See Media and Migration: Constructions of Mobility and Difference (Russell King & Nancy Wood eds., 2013).Google Scholar

³² See Takeyuki, Tsuda, Media Images, Immigrant Reality: Ethnic Prejudice and Tradition in Japanese Media Representations of Japanese-Brazilian Return Migrants (Ctr. for Comp. Immigration Stud., Working Paper No. 107, 2004).Google Scholar

³³ See Guild, Elspeth, Stefanie Grant & Kees Groenendijk, IOM and the UN: Unfinished Business (Queen Mary University of London, School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 255/2017, 2017).Google Scholar

³⁴ Who is a Migrant?, International Organization for Migration, https://www.iom.int/who-is-a-migrant (last visited July 12, 2017).Google Scholar

³⁵ See, e.g., Knox, Paul L., Marston, Sallie A. & Michael Imort, Human Geography: Places and Regions in Global Context, (2016); Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects (Tim Cresswell & Peter Merriman eds., 2011).Google Scholar

³⁶ See Martin van der Velde & Ton van Naerssen, Mobility and Migration Choices: Thresholds to Crossing Borders (2016). The European Union has entered into mobility partnerships with some countries avoiding the language of migration. See Migration and Home Affairs, Mobility Partnerships, Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreements, European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/international-affairs/eastern-partnership/mobility-partnerships-visa-facilitation-and-readmission-agreements_en (last visited Oct. 30, 2017).Google Scholar

³⁷ See Worldwide, Migrant Fatalities, Missing Migrants, https://missingmigrants.iom.int/latest-global-figures (last visited Apr. 10, 2017).Google Scholar

³⁸ See Tamara Last et al., Deaths at the Borders Database: Evidence of Deceased Migrants' Bodies Found Along the Southern External Borders of the European Union, 43 J. Ethnic & Migration Stud. 693 (2017); Thomas Spijkerboer, Are European States Accountable for Border Deaths?, in The Ashgate Research Companion to Migration law, Theory and Policy 61 (2016).Google Scholar

³⁹ See Cruz, Antonio, Carrier Sanctions in Four European Community States: Incompatibilities Between International Civil Aviation and Human Rights Obligations, 4 J. Refugee Stud. 63 (1991), Sophie Scholten & Paul Minderhoud, Regulating Immigration Control: Carrier Sanctions in the Netherlands, 10 Eur. J. Migration & L. 123 (2008); William Walters, Border/Control, in An Anthology of Migration and Social Transformation 151 (2016); Mathias Czaika & Hein Haas, The Effect of Visas on Migration Processes, Int'l Migration Rev. (2016); Disciplining the Transnational Mobility of People (Martin Geiger & Antoine Pécoud eds., 2013).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ See Spijkerboer, Thomas, Wasted Lives: Borders and the Right to Life of People Crossing Them (2016).Google Scholar

⁴¹ See Western Mediterranean, Ferrylines, http://www.ferrylines.com/ferries/western-mediterranean/ (last visited Apr. 10, 2017).Google Scholar

⁴² See Release, Press, World Tourism Organization UNWTO, International Tourist Arrivals Up 4% Reach a Record 1.2 billion in 2015, http://media.unwto.org/press-release/2016-01-18/international-tourist-arrivals-4-reach-record-12-billion-2015 (last visited, Mar. 25, 2017).Google Scholar

⁴³ See Leonie Ansems de Vries, Glenda Garelli & Martina Tazzioli, Mediterranean Migration Crisis: Transit Points, Enduring Struggles (2016); The Politics of International Migration Management 1–20 (Martin Geiger & Antoine Pécoud eds., 2010); Glenda Garelli & Martina Tazzioli, Arab Springs Making Space: Territoriality and Moral Geographies for Asylum Seekers in Italy, 31 Env't & Planning D: Soc. & Space 1004 (2013).Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Brouwer cites interviews with data protection officers in France, Germany, and the Netherlands regarding their control of personal data submitted by their authorities to one of the EU's databases on foreigners, the Schengen Information System, who confirmed to her that on average more than 40% of the data which they checked was either inaccurate or unlawful. See Brouwer, Evelien, Digital Borders and Real Rights: Effective Remedies for Third-country Nationals in the Schengen Information System (2008).Google Scholar

⁴⁵ The twenty-six European Schengen participating states share extensive personal data collected in the process of visa applications through the Visa Information System, migration processes through the SIS II database, and increasingly through asylum procedures by way of the EURODAC fingerprint database. Didier Bigo et al., Justice and Home Affairs Databases and a Smart Borders System at eu External Borders: An Evaluation of Current and Forthcoming Proposals (2012). Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US share biometric data gleaned in visa and immigration procedures which is facilitated by Australia. See U.S. Dep't of Homeland Security, Privacy Impact Assessment for the US-VISIT Five Country Joint Enrollment and Information-Sharing Project (FCC), https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_pia_usvisit_fcc.pdf.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ See Geiger, Martin, Policy Outsourcing and Remote Management, in Externalizing Migration Management: Europe, North America and the Spread of “Remote Control” Practices 261 (2016).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ See The Politics of International Migration Management 1–20 (Martin Geiger & Antoine Pécoud eds., 2010).Google Scholar

⁴⁸ See Nyers, Peter, No One Is Illegal Between City and Nation, 4 Stud. Soc. Just. 127 (2010).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ See François Crépeau & Idil Atak, Global Migration Governance, 34 Human, Netherlands Q. Rights 113 (2016).Google Scholar

⁵⁰ See Edwards, Brian, The Modern Airport Terminal: New Approaches to Airport Architecture (2004).Google Scholar

⁵¹ See Newell, Bryce Clayton, Ricardo Gomez & Verónica E. Guajardo, Sensors, Cameras, and the New “Normal” in Clandestine Migration: How Undocumented Migrants Experience Surveillance at the US-Mexico Border (2016); Martina Tazzioli, The Desultory Politics of Mobility and the Humanitarian-Military Border in the Mediterranean: Mare Nostrum Beyond the Sea, 23 REMHU: Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana 61 (2015).Google Scholar

⁵² See FRONTEX, 12 Seconds to Decide: In Search of Excellence: FRONTEX and the Principle of Best Practice (2015), http://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Publications/General/12_seconds_to_decide.pdf.Google Scholar

⁵³ See, e.g., Heathrow Delays: How Was It for You?, The Telegraph (May 1, 2012: 12:00PM) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/news/Heathrow-delays-how-was-it-for-you/ (last visited May 10, 2017).Google Scholar

⁵⁴ See Strickland, Patrick, Hungary's Border War on Refugees, Al-Jazeera (Apr. 1, 2016) http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2016/03/hungary-border-war-refugees-160329102030588.html (last visited May 10, 2017).Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Vicki Squire, Governing Migration Through Death in Europe and the US: Identification, Burial and the Crisis of Modern Humanism, 23 Eur. J. Int'l Rel. 513 (2016).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ See Dep't of Homeland Security, Infographics 2015, https://www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/visualization/2015.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Dep't of Homeland Security, Immigration Enforcement Actions, https://www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/enforcement-actions.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ See FRONTEX, Risk Analysis for 2017, http://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Publications/Risk_Analysis/Annual_Risk_Analysis_2017.pdf.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ See Engin, Isin F., We, the Non-Europeans, in Conflicting Humanities 229 (2016): 229.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Didier Bigo, Frontiers of Fear: Immigration and Insecurity in the United States and Europe 689–93 (2016).Google Scholar

⁶¹ See Haas, Hein De, Irregular Migration from West Africa to the Maghreb and the European Union: An Overview of Recent Trends, 32 Geneva: International Organization for Migration (2008).Google Scholar

⁶² See Bigo, Didier, Foreigners, Refugees Or Minorities?: Rethinking People in the Context of Border Controls and Visas (2016); Julien Jeandesboz, Justifying Control: EU Border Security and the Shifting Boundaries of Political Arrangement, in EU Borders and Shifting Internal Security 221 (2016); Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet, Unpacking the Google Scholar

New Mobilities Paradigm: Lessons for Critical Security Studies?, in Security/Mobility: Politics of Movement 209 (2017).Google Scholar

⁶³ See Franck Düvell, Paths into Irregularity: The Legal and Political Construction of Irregular Migration, 13 Eur. J. migration & L. 275 (2011).Google Scholar

⁶⁴ See Sophie Schölten, The Privatisation of Immigration Control Through Carrier Sanctions: The Role of Private Transport Companies in Dutch and British Immigration Control (2015).Google Scholar

⁶⁵ See Basaran, Tugba & Guild, Elspeth, Mobilities, Ruptures, Transitions, in International Political Sociology: Transversal Lines 228 (2016); Francesco Ragazzi, Frontiers of Fear–Immigration and Insecurity in the United States and Europe 696–98 (2016).Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Transitional restrictions have only applied for states acceding to the EU after 1967 and these transitional restrictions have been limited to a total of seven years. The only EU Member State nationals of which are still currently subject to transitional restriction on free movement of workers is Croatia.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ See Mantu, Sandra, Nationality: An Alternative Control Mechanism in an Area of Free Movement?, in Constructing and Imagining labour Migration: Perspectives of Control from Five Continents 229 (2016).Google Scholar

⁶⁸ See Migration and Migrant Population Statistics, Eurostat, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/pdfscache/1275.pdf.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ See Annette Schrauwen et al., Inclusion and Exclusion in the European Union-Collected Papers (2016).Google Scholar

⁷⁰ The New York Declaration posits that in 2015 there were 244 migrants and the number is growing (para 3). The difference between tourists and migrants is not clarified by the Declaration.Google Scholar

⁷¹ See Simanski, John F., Immigration Enforcement Actions 2013, Dep't of Homeland Security (2013), https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/ois_enforcement_ar_2013.pdf.Google Scholar

⁷² See Nat'l Travel & Tourism Office, International Visitation in the United States, http://travel.trade.gov/outreachpages/inbound.general_information.inbound_overview.html.Google Scholar

⁷³ See FRONTEX, Risk Analysis for 2017, http://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Publications/Risk_Analysis/Annual_Risk_Analysis_2017.pdf.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ See id. Google Scholar