Skip to main content
×
Home

A cosmopolitan legal order: Constitutional pluralism and rights adjudication in Europe

  • ALEC STONE SWEET (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The European Convention on Human Rights is rapidly evolving into a cosmopolitan legal order: a transnational legal system in which all public officials bear the obligation to fulfill the fundamental rights of every person within their jurisdiction. The emergence of the system depended on certain deep, structural transformations of law and politics in Europe, including the consolidation of a zone of peace and economic interdependence, of constitutional pluralism at the national level, and of rights cosmopolitanism at the transnational level. Framed by Kantian ideas, the paper develops a theoretical account of a cosmopolitan legal system, provides an overview of how the ECHR system operates, and establishes criteria for its normative assessment.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A cosmopolitan legal order: Constitutional pluralism and rights adjudication in Europe
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A cosmopolitan legal order: Constitutional pluralism and rights adjudication in Europe
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A cosmopolitan legal order: Constitutional pluralism and rights adjudication in Europe
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: alec.sweet@yale.edu
References
Hide All
Alter Karen. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anagnostou Dia, and Psychogiopoulou Evangelia (eds). 2010. European Court of Human Rights and the Rights of Marginalised Individuals and Minorities in National Context. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Andenæs Mads, and Bjørge Eirik. 2011. “National Implementation of ECHR Rights: Kant’s Categorical Imperative and the Convention.” University of Oslo Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, No. 2011/15: 59 pp.
Anderson-Gold Sharon. 2001. Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Anderson-Gold Sharon. 1988. “War and Resistance: Kant’s Implicit Doctrine of Human Rights.” Journal of Social Philosophy 19(1):37–50.
Beitz Charles. 2001. “Human Rights as a Common Concern.” American Political Science Review 95(2):269–82.
Benhabib Seyla. 2011. “Cosmopolitanism without Illusions.” In Dignity in Adversity. Human Rights in Troubled Times, edited by Benhabib Seyla. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Benhabib Seyla. 2009. “Claiming Rights across Borders: International Human Rights and Democratic Sovereignty.” American Political Science Review 103(4):691–704.
Benhabib Seyla. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Citizens and Residents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Besson Samantha. 2012. “The Erga Omnes Effect of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.” In The European Court of Human Rights after Protocol 14 – First Assessment and Perspectives, edited by Besson Samantha. Zürich: Schulthess.
Besson Samantha. 2008. “The Reception Process in Ireland and the UK.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Keller Helen and Stone Sweet Alec, 31–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bjørge Eirik. 2011. “National Supreme Courts and the Development of ECHR Rights.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 9(1):5–31.
Brown Garrett Wallace. 2009. Grounding Cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Brown Garrett Wallace. 2006. “Kantian Cosmopolitan Law and the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution.” History of Political Thought 27(4):661–84.
Brown Garrett Wallace, and Held David. 2010. The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brown Michael, Lynn-Jones Sean M., and Miller Steven (eds). 1996. Debating the Democratic Peace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Buyse Antoine, and Hamilton Michael. 2011. “Conclusions.” In Transitional Jurisprudence and the ECHR: Justice, Politics and Rights, edited by Buyse A. and Hamilton M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buyse Antoine, and Hamilton Michael (eds). 2011. Transitional Jurisprudence and the ECHR: Justice, Politics and Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Candela Soriano Mercedes. 2008. “The Reception Process in Spain and Italy.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Keller H. and Stone Sweet A., 393–450. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cederman Lars-Erik. 2001. “Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process.” American Political Science Review 96(1):15–31.
Cohen Joshua. 2004. “Minimalism About Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope For?Journal of Political Philosophy 12(2):190–213.
Dunoff Jeffrey, and Trachtman Joel. 2009. Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doyle Michael. 1986. “Liberalism and World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80(4):1151–69.
Ferrara Alessandro. 2003. “Two Notions of Humanity and the Judgment Argument for Human Rights.” Political Theory 31(3):392–420.
Finnis John. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flikschuh Katrin. 2000. Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gardbaum Stephen. 2008. “Human Rights as International Constitutional Rights.” The European Journal of International Law 19(4):749–68.
Garlicki Lech. 2007. “Constitutional Courts versus Supreme Courts.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5(1):44–68.
Gondek Michael. 2009. The Reach of Human Rights in a Globalizing World: Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. Cambridge: Intersentia.
Hammer Leonard, and Emmert Frank. 2011. The European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in Central and Eastern Europe. The Hague: Eleven.
Held David. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideas and Realities. Cambridge: Polity.
Helfer Laurence R., and Voeten Erik. 2011. “Do European Court of Human Rights Judgments Promote Legal and Policy Change?” Working Paper available at:http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/2402/.
Hoffmeister Frank. 2006. “Germany: Status of European Convention on Human Rights in Domestic Law.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 4(4):722–31.
Huntley Wade. 1996. “Kant’s Third Image: Systemic Sources of the Liberal Peace.” International Studies Quarterly 40(1):45–76.
Ignatieff Michael. 2001. Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kaboğlu İbrahim, and Koutnatzis Stylianos-Ioannis. 2008. “The Reception Process in Greece and Turkey.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Keller Helen and Stone Sweet Alec, 451–529. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant Immanuel. 1996 (1797) (Gregor M. (ed)). The Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant Immanuel. 2006 (1795; trans. Clocasure D.). Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kant Immanuel. 1994 (1784). “What is Enlightenment?” In Kant’s Political Writings, 2nd edn edited by Reiss H., 54–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelemen Daniel. 2010. Eurolegalism: The Rise of Adversarial Legalism in the European Union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Keller Helen, and Stone Sweet Alec (eds). 2008. A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klabbers Jan, Peters Anne, and Ulfstein Geir. 2009. The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kleingeld Pauline. 2011. Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krisch Nico. 2010. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kumm Mattias. 2009. “The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State.” In Ruling the World: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, edited by Dunhoff Jeffrey and Trachtman Joel, 258–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kumm Mattias. 2005. “The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty.” European Law Journal 11(3):262–307.
Kumm Mattias. 2004. “Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 2(3):574–96.
Lambert Abdelgawad Elisabeth, and Weber Anne. 2008. “The Reception Process in France and Germany.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Keller Helen and Stone Sweet Alec, 107–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nichol Danny. 2005. “Original Intent and the European Convention on Human Rights.” Public Law [2005]:152–72.
Nickel John. 2006. Making Sense of Human Rights. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nußberger Angelika. 2008. “The Reception Process in Russia and Ukraine.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Keller Helen and Stone Sweet Alec, 603–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Neal John, and Russett Bruce. 1999. “The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992.” World Politics, 52(1):1–37.
O’Neal John, Russett Bruce, and Berbaum Michael. 1999. “The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992.” International Studies Quarterly 47(3):371–93.
Petersmann Ernst-Ulrich. 2006. “Multilevel Trade Governance Requires Multilevel Constitutionalism.” In Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation, edited by Joerges C. and Petersmann E-U., 5–36. Oxford: Hart.
Pogge Thomas. 2009. “Kant’s Vision of a Just World Order.” In The Blackwell Guide to Kant’s Ethics, edited by Hill T., 196–208. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pogge Thomas. 2000. “The International Significance of Human Rights.” Journal of Ethics, 4(1-2):45–69.
Rawls John. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sadurski Wojciech. 2009. “Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalization of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments.” Human Rights Law Review 9(3):397–453.
Slaughter Anne-Marie, Stone Sweet Alec, and Weiler Joseph (eds). 1998. The European Court and the National Courts––Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in its Social Context. Oxford: Hart Press.
Smith Matthew. 2008. “Rethinking Sovereignty, Rethinking Revolution.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 36(4):405–40.
Sajo Andre (ed). 2004. Human Rights with Modesty: The Problem of Universalism. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Shapiro Martin, and Stone Sweet Alec. 2002. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stein Eric. 1981. “Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution.” American Journal of International Law 75(1):1–27.
Stone Alec. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stone Sweet Alec. 2010a. “Constitutions, Rights, and Judicial Power.” In Comparative Politics, edited by Caramani D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stone Sweet Alec. 2010b. “The European Court of Justice and the Judicialization of EU Governance.” Living Reviews in European Union Governance. Published online at: http://europeangovernance.livingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2010-2/.
Stone Sweet Alec. 2009. “Sur la constitutionnalisation de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme: la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme conçue comme une Cour constitutionnelleRevue Trimestrielle des Droits de l’Homme 80:923–44.
Stone Sweet Alec. 2004. The Judicial Construction of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stone Sweet Alec. 1999. “Judicialization and the Construction of Governance.” Comparative Political Studies 32(2):147–84.
Stone Sweet Alec and Mathews Jud. 2008. “Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 47(1):68–149.
Stone Sweet Alec and Stranz Kathleen. 2012. “Rights adjudication and constitutional pluralism in Germany and Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 19(1):91–107.
Von Staden Andreas. 2009. Shaping Human Rights Policy in Liberal Democracies: Assessing and Explaining Compliance with the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. Doctoral Dissertation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Walzer Michael. 1994. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Wiklund Ola. 2009. “The Reception Process in Sweden and Norway.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Keller Helen and Stone Sweet Alec, 165–228. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Global Constitutionalism
  • ISSN: 2045-3817
  • EISSN: 2045-3825
  • URL: /core/journals/global-constitutionalism
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 418 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 589 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.