Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Was Westphalia ‘all that’? Hobbes, Bellarmine, and the norm of non-intervention


Recently, historians of the international system have called into question the significance of the Treaties of Westphalia in 1648 as the moment when the international system formed. One of their primary arguments is that the non-intervention norm typically associated with Westphalian notions of sovereignty developed much later. This paper will examine the early 17th-century debates over the right of the Pope to depose monarchs in the defense of spiritual matters. I read Part III and Part IV of Hobbes’ Leviathan in its intellectual context to see how his theory of sovereignty was partially developed to support a theory of non-intervention. This reading leads to two important contributions to current political science debates. First, it refutes the growing consensus that non-intervention developed as an aspect of sovereignty only in the late 18th and early 19th century. Second, the paper addresses current attempts to assert a right of humanitarian intervention. By exploring similarities between these recent debates and those between Bellarmine and Hobbes in the 17th century, I offer a fresh perspective on what is at stake in current claims to international community.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Hedley Bull . 1977. The anarchical society : a study of order in world politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Martha Finnemore . 2008. “Paradoxes in Humanitarian Intervention.” In Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, edited by R. Price . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mattias Kumm . 2009. “The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State.” In Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Joel P. Trachtman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Anthony F Lang . 2009. “Conflicting Rules: Global Constitutionalism and the Kosovo Intervention.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. 3(2):185–204.

Hans Morgenthau . 1967. “To Intervene or Not to Intervene.” Foreign Affairs 45:425–36.

Nicholas Onuf . 1991. “Sovereignty: Outline of a conceptual history.” Alternatives 16(4):425–46.

Nicholas Greenwood Onuf . 1994. “Civitas Maxima: Wolff, Vattel and the Fate of Republicanism.” The American Journal of International Law 88(2):280–303.

J. H. M Salmon . 1991. “Catholic resistance theory, Ultramontanism, and the royalist response, 1580–1620.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, edited by J. H. Burns and M. Goldie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

J. P Sommerville . 1992. Thomas Hobbes : political ideas in historical context. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

James Tull . 2008. Public Philosophy in a New Key: Imperialism and Civic Freedom. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Global Constitutionalism
  • ISSN: 2045-3817
  • EISSN: 2045-3825
  • URL: /core/journals/global-constitutionalism
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 119 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 310 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.