Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

What do codes of conduct do? Hybrid constitutionalization and militarization in military markets


This article contributes to the debate over the whether or not the mainstreaming of Corporate Social Responsibility/Codes of Conduct should be welcomed. It suggests that to grapple with this question requires an engagement with the multiple and necessarily situated performativities (or jursigenerativities) of these codes. The article illustrates the argument through an analysis of two jurisgenerative processes (linked to regulation and to politics) triggered by Codes of Conduct in commercial military markets. It shows that the codes are creating both a hybrid regulatory (or constitutional) network that makes it possible to hold firms accountable and a militarization of politics. It does so by showing that the codes create first-, second- and third-order rules but also processes of misrecognition through distraction, distinction and diffusion that empower military professionals. It draws on a study of three cases involving ArmorGroup, a forerunner and advocate of regulation in military markets. This argument makes sense of the disagreements surrounding the virtues of global constitutionalism by highlighting the tensions that become apparent once it is acknowledged that Codes of Conduct are not only performative but are so in multiple ways. It can provide no easy way to dissolve the specific dilemma this multiple jurisgenerativity poses in the context of military markets specifically. But logically flowing from the argument is a suggestion that encouraging and empowering a broader, non-military/security professional involvement in the debate over the regulation of commercial military markets would be the appropriate way of handling it.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Petra Dobner , and Martin Loughlin . 2010. The Twilight of Constitutionalism? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stephen Gill . 1998. “New Constitutionalism, Democratization and Global Political Economy.” Global Change, Peace and Security 10(1):23–38.

Jean-Pascal Gond , Nahee Kang , and Jeremy Moon . 2011. “The Government of Self-Regulation: On the Comparative Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility.Economy and Society 40(4):640–71.

Stefano Guzzini , and Dietrich Jung . 2004. Copenhagen Peace Research: Conceptual Innovations and Contemporary Security Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.

Veerle Heyvaert . 2009. “Levelling Down, Levelling Up and Governing Across: Three Responses to Hybridization in International Law.” European Journal of International Law 20(3):647–74.

J. Klabbers , Anne Peters , and G. Ulfstein . 2009. The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jette Steen Knudsen . 2011. “Company Delistings from the UN Global Compact: Limited Business Demand or Domestic Governance Failure?Journal of Business Ethics 103(3):331–49.

Martti Koskenniemi . 2004. “By Their Acts You Shall Know Them… (And Not by Their Legal Theories).European Journal of International Law 15(4):839–51.

Martti Koskenniemi . 2009. “Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law.” European Journal of International Relations 15(3):395–422.

Stephen D Krasner . 2004. “Sharing Sovereignty: New Institutions for Collapsed and Failed States.” International Security 29(2):85–120.

Birgitta Schwartz , and Karina Tilling . 2009. “‘ISO-lating’ Corporate Social Responsibility in the Organizational Context: A Dissenting Interpretation of ISO 26000.Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16(5):289–99.

Gunther Teubner . 2011a. “Debate and Dialogue: Constitutionalizing Polycontexturality.” Social & Legal Studies 20(2):209–52.

Gunther Teubner . 2011b. “Self-Constitutionalizing TNCs? On the Linkage of ‘Private’ and ‘Public’ Corporate Codes of Conduct.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 18(2):617–38.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Global Constitutionalism
  • ISSN: 2045-3817
  • EISSN: 2045-3825
  • URL: /core/journals/global-constitutionalism
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 66 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 176 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.