Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Reasons behind current gender imbalances in senior global health roles and the practice and policy changes that can catalyze organizational change

  • C. Newman (a1), P.K. Chama (a2), M. Mugisha (a3), C.W. Matsiko (a4) and V. Oketcho (a5)...
Abstract
Abstract

The paper distils results from a review of relevant literature and two gender analyses to highlight reasons for gender imbalances in senior roles in global health and ways to address them. Organizations, leadership, violence and discrimination, research and human resource management are all gendered. Supplementary materials from gender analyses in two African health organizations demonstrate how processes such as hiring, deployment and promotion, and interpersonal relations, are not ‘gender-neutral’ and that gendering processes shape privilege, status and opportunity in these health organizations. Organizational gender analysis, naming stereotypes, substantive equality principles, special measures and enabling conditions to dismantle gendered disadvantage can catalyze changes to improve women's ability to play senior global health roles in gendered organizations. Political strategies and synergies with autonomous feminist movements can increase women's full and effective participation and equal opportunities. The paper also presents organizational development actions to bring about more gender egalitarian global health organizations.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Reasons behind current gender imbalances in senior global health roles and the practice and policy changes that can catalyze organizational change
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Reasons behind current gender imbalances in senior global health roles and the practice and policy changes that can catalyze organizational change
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Reasons behind current gender imbalances in senior global health roles and the practice and policy changes that can catalyze organizational change
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
*Address for correspondence: C. Newman, IntraHealth International Inc, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. (Email: cnewman@intrahealth.org)
References
Hide All
1. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals: 17 Goals to Transform Our World. (http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality). Accessed 24 March 2017.
2. Eagly AE, Heilman ME. Gender and leadership: introduction to the special issue. The Leadership Quarterly 2016; 27: 349353.
3. Newman CJ. Time to address gender discrimination and inequality in the health workforce. Human Resources for Health 2014; 12: 25.
4. Davies A, Thomas R. Gender and human resource management: a critical review. International Journal of Human Resource Management 2000; 11: 11251135.
5. Sinclair A. Women within diversity: risks and possibilities. Women in Management Review 2000; 15: 237245.
6. Dreher GF. Breaking the glass ceiling: the effects of sex ratios and work-life programs on female leadership at the top. Human Relations 2003; 56: 541562.
7. Eagly AH, Carli L. Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review 2007; 85: 6271.
8. Eagly AH, Karau SJ. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 2002; 109: 573598.
9. Dhatt R, et al. The role of women's leadership and gender equity in leadership and health system strengthening. Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics 2017; 2: 19.
10. World Health Organization. Spotlight on Statistics: A Fact File on Health Workforce Statistics; Issue 2. (http://www.who.int/hrh/statistics/spotlight2/en/). Accessed 30 March 2017.
11. Newman CJ, et al. Workplace violence and gender discrimination in Rwanda's health sector: increasing safety and gender equality. Human Resources for Health 2011; 9: 19.
12. Newman CJ, et al. Making non-discrimination and equal opportunity a reality in Kenya's health provider education system: results of a gender analysis. World Health and Population 2011; 13: 2333.
13. Newman CJ, et al. Integration of gender-transformative interventions into health professional education reform for the 21st century. Human Resources for Health 2016; 14: 14.
14. Hearn J, Parkin W. Gender, Sexuality and Violence in Organizations: The Unspoken Forces of Organization Violations. London: Sage Publications, 2001.
15. Mills AJ. Gendering organizational culture: from theory to analysis – identifying discriminatory discourses in the making of British Airways. Paper presented at the Business History Division, Administrative Sciences Association of Canada annual meeting, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 1994.
16. Tomaskovic-Devey D. The relational generation of workplace inequalities. Social Currents 2014; 1: 5173.
17. Acker J. Gendering organization theory. In: Mills AJ, Tancred P, eds. Gendering Organization Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1992, pp. 248260.
18. Schofield T. Gendered organizational dynamics: the elephant in the room for Australian allied health workforce policy and planning? Journal of Sociology 2009; 45: 383400.
19. Acker J. Inequality regimes: gender, class and race in organizations. In: Spade JZ, Valentine CG, eds. The Kaleidoscope of Gender: Prisms, Patterns, and Possibilities. Los Angeles: Pine Forge, 2011, pp. 355365.
20. Ridgeway CL, Correll SJ. Unpacking the gender system: a theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender and Society 2004; 18: 510531.
21. Connell R. Gender, health and theory: conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Social Science and Medicine 2012; 74: 16751683.
22. Goetz AM. Managing organizational change: the ‘gendered’ organization of space and time. Gender and Development 1997; 4: 1727.
23. Byron RA, Roscigno VJ. Relational power, legitimation and pregnancy discrimination. Gender and Society 2014; 28: 435462.
24. Acker J. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society 1990; 4: 139158.
25. Morimoto SA, Zajicek A. Dismantling the ‘Master's House’: feminist reflections on institutional transformation. Critical Sociology 2014; 40: 135150.
26. Schippers M. Recovering the feminine other: masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society 2007; 36: 85102.
27. Glass J. Envisioning the integration of family and work: toward a kinder, gentler workplace. Contemporary Sociology 2000; 29: 129143.
28. Williams JC. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
29. Perlow LA, Kelly EL. Toward a model of work redesign for better work and better life. Work and Occupations 2014; 41: 111134.
30. Cockburn C. In the Way of Women: Men's Resistance to Sex Equality in Organizations. Ithaca: ILR Press, 1991.
31. Walby S. Theorizing Patriarchy. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 1991.
32. Yoder JD. Making leadership work more effectively for women. Journal of Social Issues 2001; 57: 815828.
33. Anker R, Malkas H, Korten A. Gender-Based Occupational Segregation in the 1990s. International Labour Organization Working Paper No. 16. Geneva: ILO, 2003.
34. Charles M, Grusky D. Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.
35. Rudman LA, Glick P. Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash towards agentic women. Journal of Social Issues 2001; 57: 743762.
36. Ridgeway CL. Gender, status and leadership. Journal of Social Issues 2001; 57: 637655.
37. Newman CJ et al. Occupational segregation, gender essentialism and male primacy as major barriers to equity in HIV/AIDS caregiving: findings from Lesotho. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2011; 10: 24.
38. Maume D. Is the glass ceiling a unique form of inequality? Evidence from a random-effects model of managerial attainment. Critical Sociology 2011; 31: 116.
39. Koenig AM, et al. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin 2011; 137: 616642.
40. Heilman MF. Description and prescription: how gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues 2001; 57: 657674.
41. Williams JC. The 5 biases that are pushing women out of STEM. Harvard Business Review. (https://hbr.org/2015/03/the-5-biases-pushing-women-out-of-stem). Published online: 24 March 2015.
42. Schilt K. Just One of the Guys: Transgender Men and the Persistence of Gender Inequality. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2010, p. 2.
43. Budig M, England P. The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review 2001; 66: 204225.
44. Hodges MJ, Budig MJ. Who gets the daddy bonus? Organizational hegemonic masculinity and the impact of fatherhood on earnings. Gender & Society 2010; 24: 717.
45. Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I. Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology 2007; 112: 12971339.
46. James G. Pregnancy discrimination at work: A review. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission. 2004. http://www.frareg.com/sites/default/files/documenti/pregnancy_discrimination.pdf
47. Center for WorkLife Law. Current Law Prohibits Discrimination Based on Family Responsibilities & Gender Stereotyping. UC Hastings College of the Law. (http://www.worklifelaw.org/pubs/IssueBriefFRD.pdf). Accessed 31 March 2017.
48. Dodson L. Stereotyping low-wage mothers who have work and family conflicts. Journal of Social Issues 2013; 69: 257278.
49. International Labour Organization. Convention concerning equal opportunities and equal treatment for men and women workers: Workers with Family Responsibilities Convention (C.156), 1983.
50. Siegel NS, Siegel RB. Pregnancy and sex role stereotyping: from Struck to Carhart . Ohio State Law Journal 2009; 70: 10991111.
51. Williams JC, Dempsey R. What Works for Women at Work: Four Patterns Working Women Need to Know. New York: New York University Press, 2014.
52. Williams JC, Bornstein S. The evolution of ‘FReD’: family responsibilities discrimination and developments in the Law of stereotyping and implicit bias. Hastings Law Journal 2008; 59: 13111358.
53. Mullins LB. Is family responsibilities discrimination the new sex discrimination? Lessons from school teachers perceptions. Public Administration Review 2014; 2: 142.
54. Center for WorkLifeLaw. Caregiver Discrimination Under Title VII. UC Hastings College of the Law. (http://www.worklifelaw.org/pubs/FRDUnderTitleVIIBrief.pdf). Accessed 31 March 2017.
55. Center for WorkLife Law. Family responsibilities discrimination. UC Hastings College of the Law. (http://worklifelaw.org/pubs/FRD_Fact_Sheet.pdf). Accessed 31 March 2017.
56. Abrams K. Gender discrimination and the transformation of workplace norms. Vanderbilt Law Review 1989; 42: 11831248.
57. Bender L. Sex discrimination or gender inequality? Fordham Law Review, 1989; 57: 941954.
58. Gregory RF. Women and Workplace Discrimination: Overcoming Barriers to Gender Equality. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2003.
59. Williams JC. Deconstructing gender. Michigan Law Review 1989; 87: 797845.
60. McLaughlin H et al. Sexual harassment, workplace authority and the paradox of power. American Sociological Review 2012; 77: 625.
61. Tamale S. When Hens Begin to Crow: Gender and Parliamentary Politics in Uganda. Boulder: Westview Press, 1999.
62. Yount KR. Ladies, flirts and tomboys: strategies for managing sexual harassment in an underground coal mine. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 1991; 19: 396422.
63. Sen G, Östlin P. Unequal, Unfair, Ineffective and Inefficient Gender Inequity in Health: why it exists and how we can change it. Final Report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. (http://www.who.int/social_determinants/resources/csdh_media/wgekn_final_report_07.pdf). Accessed 31 March 2017.
64. Tolhurst R et al. Intersectionality and gender mainstreaming in international health: using a feminist participatory action research process to analyse voices and debates from the global south and north. Social Science & Medicine 2012; 74: 18251832.
65. Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 1993; 43: 12411299.
66. Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989; 1: 139167.
67. International Women's Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific. Addressing intersectional discrimination with temporary special measures. IWRAW Asia Pacific Occasional Papers Series No. 8, 2006.
68. Kwedi Nolna SK, Essama Mekongo PE, Leke RGF. Mentoring for early career women in health research: the HIGHER women consortium approach. Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics 2017; 2: e3.
69. Johnson AG. The Gender Knot: Unraveling Our Patriarchal Legacy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2014.
70. Cook RJ, Cusack S. Gender Stereotyping: Transnational Legal Perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.
71. United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Gender stereotypes and stereotyping. (http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Women/WRGS/Pages/GenderStereotypes.aspx). Accessed 31 March 2017.
72. United Nations General Assembly. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. 1979. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/
73. Cusack S. Gender Stereotyping as a Human Rights Violation. Report submitted to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (http://www.esem.org.mk/pdf/Najznachajni%20vesti/2014/3/Cusack.pdf). 14 October 2013.
74. Gender Hub e-Learning. Gender stereotypes: How can we move beyond stereotyping? (http://www.genderhub.org/build-capacity/elearning-from-us/). Accessed 5 February 2016.
75. Wise T. IntelligenceSquared Debates. Affirmative action debate: Tim Wise 3/14 - Intelligence Squared U.S. [Video file]. (http://youtu.be/6uH0vpGZJCo\). Accessed 31 March 2017.
76. United Nations General Assembly. Report of the working group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and practice. Human Rights Council. A/HRC/20/28, 2012.
77. Dickens L. What HRM means for gender equality. Human Resource Management Journal 1998; 8: 2340.
78. Collins S. From affirmative action to diversity: erasing inequality from organizational responsibility. Critical Sociology 2011; 37: 517520.
79. Embrick DG. The diversity ideology in the business world: a new oppression for a new age. Critical Sociology 2011; 37: 541556.
80. Kirton G, Greene AM. What does diversity management mean for the gender equality project in the United Kingdom? Views and experience of organizational actors. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 2010; 27: 249262.
81. Correll SJ, et al. Redesigning, redefining work. Work and Occupations 2014; 41: 317.
82. Rao A, Kelleher D. Unraveling institutionalized gender inequality. Occasional paper. No.8. Association for Women's Rights in Development, 2002.
83. Batliwala S. Feminist Leadership for Social Transformation: Clearing the conceptual cloud. Creating Resources for Empowerment and Action. May 2010. (https://justassociates.org/sites/justassociates.org/files/feminist-leadership-clearing-conceptual-cloud-srilatha-batliwala.pdf).
84. Fairtlough G. The Three Ways of Getting Things Done: Hierarchy, Heterarchy & Responsible Autonomy in Organizations. Axminster: Triarchy Press, 2007.
85. Williams JC, Blair-Loy M, Berdahl JL. Cultural schemas, social class and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues 2013; 69: 209254.
86. Rudman LA, Mescher K. Penalizing men who request a family leave: is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma? Journal of Social Issues 2013; 69: 322340.
87. Gornick JC, Meyers MK. Creating gender egalitarian societies: an agenda for reform. Politics & Society 2008; 36: 313349.
88. Balakrishnan R et al. Transforming Women's Work: Policies for an Inclusive Agenda. Newark: Rutgers Center for Women's Global Leadership, 2016.
89. Ridgeway C. Limiting inequality though interaction: the end (s) of gender. Contemporary Sociology 2000; 29: 110120.
90. Htun M & Weldon SL. The civic origins of progressive policy change: combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975–2005. American Political Science Review 2012; 106: 548569.
91. Davis AY. Freedom is a Constant Struggle. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2016.
92. Butler J et al. (eds) Vulnerability in Resistance. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2016.
93. Foster D, Ren X. Work–family conflict and the commodification of women's employment in three Chinese airlines. International Journal of Human Resource Management 2015; 26: 15681585.
94. Longwe SH. Addressing Rural Gender Issues: A Framework for Leadership and Mobilisation. Paper presented at the III World Congress for Rural Women, Madrid, 2002.
95. Erdström J, Das A, Dolan C. Introduction: Undressing patriarchy and masculinities to re-politicise gender. IDS Bulletin, 2014. 45: 1–10.
96. Sandler J, Rao A. The elephant in the room and the dragons at the gate: strategising for gender equality in the 21st century. Gender & Development 2012; 20: 547562.
97. Longwe SH. The evaporation of gender policies in the patriarchal cooking pot. Development in Practice 1997; 7: 148156.
98. Association for Women's Rights and Development. Gender mainstreaming: Can it work for women?s rights? Spotlight Number 3.November 2004. https://www.awid.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/spotlight_-_gender_mainstreaming_-_can_it_work_for_womens_rights.pdf
99. Moosa Z. A Theory of Change for Tackling Violence Against Women and Girls. ActionAid-UK on behalf of the Gender & Development Network. Department for International Development, 2012.
100. Women in Global Health. 60/40 Gender Parity Panel Pledge. (http://www.womeningh.org/pledge). Accessed 27 May 2017.
101. Lerner G. The Creation of Patriarchy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
102. Jewkes R, Morrell R. Gender and sexuality: emerging perspectives from the heterosexual epidemic in South Africa and implications for HIV risk and prevention. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2010; 13: 6. (http://www.jiasociety.org/content/13/1/6).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2054-4200
  • URL: /core/journals/global-health-epidemiology-and-genomics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 89
Total number of PDF views: 261 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 471 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 10th December 2017 - 20th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.