Skip to main content Accessibility help

Leveraging digitalization for sustainability in urban transport

  • Felix Creutzig (a1) (a2), Martina Franzen (a3), Rolf Moeckel (a4), Dirk Heinrichs (a1), Kai Nagel (a5), Simon Nieland (a6) and Helga Weisz (a7) (a8)...


Digitalization coevolves with and fosters three revolutions in urban transport: sharing, electrification and automatization. This dynamic poses severe risks for social and environmental sustainability. Only strong public policies can steer digitalization towards fostering sustainability in urban transport.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Leveraging digitalization for sustainability in urban transport
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Leveraging digitalization for sustainability in urban transport
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Leveraging digitalization for sustainability in urban transport
      Available formats


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (, which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Prof Dr Felix Creutzig, E-mail:


Hide All
Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment, and Migration Working Papers, (189), 0_1. Retrieved from
Bai, X., Dawson, R. J., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Delgado, G. C., Barau, A. S., Dhakal, S., … Schultz, S. (2018). Six research priorities for cities and climate change. Nature, 555, 2325.
Bischoff, J., & Maciejewski, M. (2016). Autonomous taxicabs in Berlin – A spatiotemporal analysis of service performance. Transportation Research Procedia, 19, 176186.
Bongardt, D., Breithaupt, M., & Creutzig, F. (2010). Beyond the fossil city: Towards low carbon transport and green growth. Fifth Regional EST Forum. Retrieved from
Bongardt, D., Creutzig, F., Hüging, H., Sakamoto, K., Bakker, S., Gota, S., & Böhler-Baedeker, S. (2013). Low-Carbon Land Transport: Policy Handbook. Routledge.
Castiglione, J., Roy, S., Cooper, D., Sana, B., Chen, M., & Erhardt, G. D. (2019). The Effect of Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) on Congestion in San Francisco. Presented at The 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Chase, R. (2015). Peers Inc: How People and Platforms Are Inventing the Collaborative Economy and Reinventing Capitalism. PublicAffairs.
City of Copenhagen (2017). Copenhagen City of Cyclists. Fact & Figures. Retrieved from
Cohen, P., Hahn, R., Hall, J., Levitt, S., & Metcalfe, R. (2016). Using Big Data to Estimate Consumer Surplus: The Case of Uber. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Cohen, T., & Cavoli, C. (2019). Automated vehicles: Exploring possible consequences of government (non) intervention for congestion and accessibility. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 129151.
Creutzig, F., Agoston, P., Minx, J. C., Canadell, J. G., Andrew, R. M., Le Quéré, C., … Dhakal, S. (2016). Urban infrastructure choices structure climate solutions. Nature Climate Change, 6(12), 10541056.
Creutzig, F., Lohrey, S., Bai, X., Baklanov, A., Dawson, R., Dhakal, S., … Munoz, E. (2019). Upscaling urban data science for global climate solutions. Global Sustainability, 2, e2.
Davidsson, P., Hajinasab, B., Holmgren, J., Jevinger, Å., & Persson, J. A. (2016). The fourth wave of digitalization and public transport: Opportunities and challenges. Sustainability, 8(12), 1248.
Deaux, K. (1996). Social identification. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. K. (eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (pp. 777798). Guilford Press.
Dickel, S., & Franzen, M. (2016). The ‘problem of extension’ revisited: New modes of digital participation in science. Journal of Science Communication, 15(1), A06.
Docherty, I., Marsden, G., & Anable, J. (2018). The governance of smart mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 115, 114125.
Fossati, M. R. (2018). Sharing economies. For each one. For all. In Bruglieri, M. (ed.), Multidisciplinary Design of Sharing Services (pp. 129141). Springer.
Fulton, L., Mason, J., & Meroux, D. (2017). Three Revolutions in Urban Transportation: How to Achieve the Full Potential of Vehicle Electrification, Automation, and Shared Mobility in Urban Transportation Systems Around the World by 2050. University of California, Davis and Institute for Transportation and Development Policy.
Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for People. Island Press.
Gossart, C. (2015). Rebound effects and ICT: A review of the literature. In ICT Innovations for Sustainability (pp. 435448). Springer.
Gössling, S. (2018). ICT and transport behavior: A conceptual review. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(3), 153164.
Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(4), 682703.
Haklay, M., & Weber, P. (2008). Openstreetmap: User-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4), 1218.
Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 939941.
Henao, A., & Marshall, W. E. (2018). The impact of ride-hailing on vehicle miles traveled. Transportation, 10.1007/s1111.
Herrmann, S., Schulte, F., & Voß, S. (2014). Increasing acceptance of free-floating car sharing systems using smart relocation strategies: A survey based study of car2go Hamburg. In International Conference on Computational Logistics (pp. 151162). Springer.
Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. Psychology Press.
Kaddoura, I., Bischoff, J., & Nagel, K. (2018). Towards welfare optimal operation of innovative mobility concepts: External cost pricing in a world of shared autonomous vehicles. VSP Working paper, 18-01. Retrieved from
Kamargianni, M., Li, W., Matyas, M., & Schafer, A. (2016). A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 32943303.
Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 114.
Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 131136.
Lenz, B., & Heinrichs, D. (2017). What can we learn from smart urban mobility technologies? IEEE Pervasive Computing, 16(2), 8486.
Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., Poinsatte-Jones, K., & Florin, M.-V. (2018). Governance strategies for a sustainable digital world. Sustainability, 10(2), 440.
Lopez, D., & Farooq, B. (2018). A blockchain framework for smart mobility. ArXiv:1809.05785 [Cs]. Retrieved from
Lugano, G. (2017). Assessing Individual and Group Behavior from Mobility Data: Technological Advances and Emerging Applications. Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining, 10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_219-1.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Inklusion und exklusion. In Luhmann, N. (ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 6: Die Soziologie und der Mensch (pp. 237264). Westdeutscher Verlag.
Manovich, L. (2011). Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data. Debates in the Digital Humanities, 2, 460475.
Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2018). Governance of the Smart Mobility Transition. Emerald Publishing.
Martinez, L. M., & Viegas, J. M. (2017). Assessing the impacts of deploying a shared self-driving urban mobility system: An agent-based model applied to the city of Lisbon, Portugal. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 6(1), 1327.
Michael, M., & Lupton, D. (2016). Toward a manifesto for the ‘public understanding of big data’. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 104116.
Miller, H. J. (2013). Beyond sharing: Cultivating cooperative transportation systems through geographic information science. Journal of Transport Geography, 31, 296308.
Moeckel, R. (2017). Modeling the impact of communications technologies on travel behavior and land use. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2658, 816.
Paskaleva, K., Evans, J., Martin, C., Linjordet, T., Yang, D., Karvonen, A., … Karvonen, A. (2017). Data Governance in the Sustainable Smart City. Informatics, 4(4), 41.
Press, G. (2018). 6 lessons from Tel-Aviv for successful digital transformation of smart cities. Retrieved from
Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2017). Cycling towards a More Sustainable Transport Future. Taylor & Francis.
Reckien, D., Creutzig, F., Fernandez, B., Lwasa, S., Tovar-Restrepo, M., McEvoy, D., & Satterthwaite, D. (2017). Climate change, equity and the Sustainable Development Goals: An urban perspective. Environment and Urbanization, 29(1), 159182.
Rolnick, D., Donti, P. L., Kaack, L. H., Kochanski, K., Lacoste, A., Sankaran, K., … Waldman-Brown, A. (2019). Tackling climate change with machine learning. ArXiv Preprint, ArXiv:1906.05433.
Rubin, J. (2016). Connected autonomous vehicles: Travel behavior and energy use. In Meyer, G & Beiker, S (eds.), Lecture Notes in Mobility. Road Vehicle Automation 3 (pp. 151162). Springer.
Sadowski, J. (2017). Google wants to run cities without being elected. Don't let it. The Guardian, 24 October.
Sadowski, J., & Pasquale, F. A. (2015). The Spectrum of Control: A Social Theory of the Smart City (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2653860). Retrieved from
Scheiber, N. (2017). How Uber uses psychological tricks to push its drivers’ buttons. The New York Times, 2 April.
SEU (2003). Making the connections: Final report on transport and social exclusion. Retrieved from
Shaw, C., Hales, S., Howden-Chapman, P., & Edwards, R. (2014). Health co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies in the transport sector. Nature Climate Change, 4(6), 427.
Silva, M., Leal, V., Oliveira, V., & Horta, I. M. (2018). A scenario-based approach for assessing the energy performance of urban development pathways. Sustainable Cities and Society, 40, 372382.
Stichweh, R. (2016). Inklusion und Exklusion: Studien zur Gesellschaftstheorie (Vol. 1). Verlag.
Suatmadi, A. Y., Creutzig, F., & Otto, I. M. (2019). On-demand motorcycle taxis improve mobility, not sustainability. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(2), 218229.
Toole, J. L., Colak, S., Sturt, B., Alexander, L. P., Evsukoff, A., & González, M. C. (2015). The path most traveled: Travel demand estimation using big data resources. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 58, 162177.
Truby, J. (2018). Decarbonizing Bitcoin: Law and policy choices for reducing the energy consumption of Blockchain technologies and digital currencies. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 399410.
Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D., & Leiby, P. (2016). Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 86, 118.
Wu, F., & Xue, Y. (2017). Innovations of bike sharing industry in China: A case study of Mobike's station-less bike sharing system. Retrieved from
Ziemke, D., Kaddoura, I., & Nagel, K. (2019). The MATSim Open Berlin Scenario: A multimodal agent-based transport simulation scenario based on synthetic demand modeling and Open Data. Procedia Computer Science, 151, 870877.


Leveraging digitalization for sustainability in urban transport

  • Felix Creutzig (a1) (a2), Martina Franzen (a3), Rolf Moeckel (a4), Dirk Heinrichs (a1), Kai Nagel (a5), Simon Nieland (a6) and Helga Weisz (a7) (a8)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed