Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Rethinking climate policy with alternative framings of carbon dioxide

  • Jarkko Levänen (a1) and Janne I. Hukkinen (a2)

Abstract

Since the earliest stages of international climate policy, carbon dioxide (CO2) has been framed and widely accepted as a problem that needs to be solved by reducing its amount in the atmosphere. In principle this is a correct and relevant starting point for efforts to decarbonize societies. At the same time, however, the unquestioned and one-sided framing of CO2 as a problem has significantly biased the strategies for tackling climate change. We introduce the origins, meanings and implications of one-sided framing of CO2 in climate policy. We also discuss how alternative framings could impact policymaking and eventually our capacity to mitigate climate change. We introduce a paradox: framing CO2 as a problem often translates into policies that hamper the implementation of technologies to decrease the amount of CO2 emitted into the atmosphere. We suggest that plurality in framing CO2 could lead to innovative ways and strategies to combat climate change.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Rethinking climate policy with alternative framings of carbon dioxide
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Rethinking climate policy with alternative framings of carbon dioxide
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Rethinking climate policy with alternative framings of carbon dioxide
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Jarkko Levänen, E-mail: jarkko.levanen@lut.fi

References

Hide All
Anderson, K. & Peters, G. (2016). The trouble with negative emissions. Science, 354, 182183.
Benford, R.D. & Snow, D.A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611639.
Brent, G.F., Allen, D.J., Eichler, B.R., Petrie, J.G., & Mann, J.P. (2011). Mineral carbonation as the core of an industrial symbiosis for energy-intensive minerals conversion. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(1), 94104.
Creutzig, F., Ravindranath, N.H., Berndes, G., Bolwig, S., Bright, R., Cherubini, F., Chum, H., Corbera, E., Delucchi, M., Faaij, A., Fargione, J., Haberl, H., Health, G., Lucon, O., Plevin, R., Popp, A., Robledo-Abad, C., Rose, S., Smith, P., Stromman, A., Suh, S., & Masera, O. (2015). Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment. GCB Bioenergy, 7, 916944.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017). The Circular Economy: A Wealth of Flows, 2nd edition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation Publishing.
Eloneva, S., Said, A., Fogelholm, C.-J., & Zevenhoven, R. (2012). Preliminary assessment of a method utilizing carbon dioxide and steelmaking slags to produce precipitated calcium carbonate. Applied Energy, 90(1), 329334.
Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 5158.
European Academies Science Advisory Council (EASAC) (2018). Negative emission technologies: What role in meeting Paris Agreement targets? EASAC Policy Reports, 35.
Gamson, W. (1992). Talking Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1990). Climate Change: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Jacoby, W.G. (2000). Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 750767.
Jadhav, S.G., Vaidya, P.D., Bhanage, B.M., Joshi, J.B. (2014). Catalytic carbon dioxide hydrogenation to methanol: a review of recent studies. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 92, 25572567.
Kainiemi, L., Eloneva, S., Toikka, A., Levänen, J., & Järvinen, M. (2015). Opportunities and obstacles for CO2 mineralization: CO2 mineralization specific frames in the interviews of Finnish carbon capture and storage (CCS) experts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 94, 352358.
Keohane, R.O. & Victor, D.G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 570575.
Kowalok, M.E. (1993). Common threads: research lessons from acid rain, ozone depletion, and global warming. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 35(6), 1238.
Lenschow, A. & Zito, A.R. (1998). Blurring or shifting of policy frames? Institutionalization of the economic-environmental policy linkage in the European community. Governance, 11(4), 415441.
Leung, D.Y.C., Caramanna, G., & Maroto-Valer, M.M. (2014). An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 426443.
Levänen, J. (2015). A turning point in the EU's climate policy: carbon capture and the third period of the emissions trading scheme. FIIA Briefing Paper, 176. The Finnish Institute of International Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/a-turning-point-in-the-eus-climate-policy.
Levänen, J. & Eloneva, S. (2017). Fighting sustainability challenges on two fronts: material efficiency and the emerging carbon capture and storage technologies. Environmental Science & Policy, 76, 131138.
Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369380.
Olah, G.A., Goeppert, A., & Surya Prakash, G.K. (2008). Chemical recycling of carbon dioxide to methanol and dimethyl ether: from greenhouse gas to renewable, environmentally carbon neutral fuels and synthetic hydrocarbons. Journal of Organic Chemistry, 74(2), 487498.
Olah, G.A., Surya Prakash, G.K., & Goeppert, A. (2011). Anthropogenic chemical carbon cycle for a sustainable future. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 133(33), 1288112898.
Phalan, B. (2009). The social and environmental impacts of biofuels in Asia: an overview. Applied Energy, 86, S21S29.
Rahman, F.A., Aziz, M.A., Saidur, R., Wan Abu Bakar, W.A., Putrajaya, R., & Hassan, N.A. (2017). Pollution to solution: capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its utilization as a renewable energy source for a sustainable future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, 112126.
Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., Schaeffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K., & Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature, 534, 631639.
Schön, D. & Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. Basic Books.
Sunstein, C.R. (2007). Of Montreal and Kyoto: a tale of two protocols. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 31(1), 165.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), S251S278.

Keywords

Rethinking climate policy with alternative framings of carbon dioxide

  • Jarkko Levänen (a1) and Janne I. Hukkinen (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed