Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Ambivalent Europeans? Public Support for European Integration in East and West

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Abstract

In the midst of the economic crisis sweeping across the European continent, popular support for European integration has become a common theme in political discourse. This article revisits the debate regarding popular support for European integration. Although many journalists, politicians and pundits currently argue that the public is becoming increasingly sceptical of further steps towards integration, this study qualifies that claim and suggests that public opinion towards Europe is best described as ambivalent. Also, it shows that ambivalence regarding European integration is higher in Western than in Central and Eastern Europe. This is probably due to the fact that as citizens in Western Europe have gained more experience with the positive and negative consequences of integration over the years, they have also become more ambivalent about the European project. Rather than suggesting that citizens are by and large turning their backs on Europe, I put forward the view that we seem to be witnessing growing uncertainty about the future scope and depth of the integration process. This, I argue, could be viewed as a natural by-product of experiencing both the virtues and the vices association with membership. Consequently, attitude ambivalence as such may be demonstrative of a maturation of public opinion concerning European integration.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

*

Catherine E. de Vries is Professor of European Politics in the Department of Politics and International Relations and a Fellow of Lincoln College at Oxford University. Contact email: catherine.devries@politics.ox.ac.uk.

References

Achen, C.H. (1975), ‘Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response’, American Political Science Review, 69(4): 12181231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R.M.Brehm, J. (1995), ‘American Ambivalence towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values’, American Journal of Political Science, 39(4): 10551082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R.M.Brehm, J.(1997), ‘Are Americans Ambivalent towards Racial Policies?’, American Journal of Political Science, 41(2): 345374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R.M.Brehm, J. (1998), ‘Speaking in Two Voices: American Equivocation about the Internal Revenue Service’, American Journal of Political Science, 42(2): 418452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R.M.Brehm, J. (2002), Hard Choices, Easy Answers: Values, Information, and American Public Opinion (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Anderson, C.J. (1998), ‘When in Doubt Use Proxies: Attitudes to Domestic Politics and Support for the EU’, Comparative Political Studies, 31: 569601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C.J.Reichert, M.S. (1995), ‘Economic Benefits and Support for Membership in the EU: A Cross-National Analysis’, Journal of Public Policy, 15: 231249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barroso, J.M.R. (2012), speech made by José Manuel Durão Barroso, the president of the European Commission, at the Yale Global Constitutionalism Seminar, The Hague, 1 September, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-930_en.htm.Google Scholar
Beichelt, T. (2004), ‘Euro-skepticism in the EU Accession Countries’, Comparative European Politics, 2(1): 2950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boomgaarden, H.G., Schuck, A.R.T., Elenbaas, M.de Vreese, C. (2011), ‘Mapping EU Attitudes: Conceptual and Empirical Dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU Support’, European Union Politics, 12(2): 241266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J.T., Gardner, W.L.Berntson, G.G. (1997), ‘Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1): 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. (2002), ‘Undivided Loyalties: Is National Identity an Obstacle to European Integration?’, European Union Politics, 3: 387413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
delli Carpini, M.X.Keeter, S. (1996), What Americans Know about Politics and Why it Matters (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Converse, P.E. (1962), ‘Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes’, Political Research Quarterly, 263: 578599.Google Scholar
Converse, P.E. (1964), ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’, in D.A. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent (London: Free Press of Glencoe): 206261.Google Scholar
EES (European Parliament Election Survey) (2009), ‘European Parliament Election Study 2009: Voter Study, Advance Release, 7/4/2010’, European University Institute project Providing an Infrastructure for Research on Electoral Democracy in the European Union, www.piredeu.eu.Google Scholar
Eichenberg, R.C.Dalton, R.J. (2007), ‘Post-Maastricht Blues: The Welfare State and the Transformation of Citizen Support for European Integration, 1973–2002’, Acta Politica, 42: 128152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Eijk, C.Franklin, M.N. (2004), ‘Potential for Contestation on European Matters at National Elections in Europe’, in G. Marks and M.R. Steenbergen (eds), European Integration and Political Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 3350.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (2006), ‘The Social Bases of Political Divisions in Post-Communist Eastern Europe’, Annual Review of Sociology, 32: 245270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, S. (1995), ‘Answering Survey Questions: The Measurement and Meaning of Public Opinion’, in M. Lodge and K.M. McGraw (eds), Political Judgment: Structure and Process (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press): 249270.Google Scholar
Freire, A. (2006), ‘Bringing Social Identities Back In: The Social Anchors of Left–Right Orientation in Western Europe’, International Political Science Review, 27: 359378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, A. (2008), ‘Party Polarization and Citizens’ Left–Right Orientations’, Party Politics, 14(2): 189209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, M.J. (1998a), ‘Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories’, Journal of Politics, 60: 333354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, M.J. (1998b), Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbers, I., de Vries, C.E.Steenbergen, M.R. (2013), ‘Attitude Variability among Latin American Publics: How Party System Structuration Affects Left/Right Ideology’, Comparative Political Studies, August.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmsen, R.Spiering, M. (2004) (eds), ‘Euroscepticism: Party Politics, National Identity and European Integration’, European Studies, 20, special issue.Google Scholar
Harvey, A.C. (1976), ‘Estimating Regression Models with Multiplicative Heteroskedasticity’, Econometrica, 44(3): 461465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, A.Tucker, J. (2010), ‘The Dynamics of Support: The Winners–Losers Gap in Attitudes toward EU Membership in Post-Communist Countries’, European Political Science Review, 2(2): 235267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, S.B. (2009), Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, S.B.Brouard, S. (2011), ‘Contesting the European Union? Why the Dutch and the French Rejected the European Constitution’, Political Research Quarterly, 64(2): 309322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, S.B.Tilley, J. (2014), ‘Who's in Charge? Voter Attribution of Responsibility in the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, S.B., Spoon, J.-J.Tilley, J. (2009), A Vote against Europe? Explaining Defection at the 1999 and 2004 European Parliament Elections’, British Journal of Political Science, 39(1): 93115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, O.R. (1992), ‘Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond–Lippmann Consensus’, International Studies Quarterly, 36: 439466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L.Marks, G. (2005), ‘Calculation, Community, and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration’, European Union Politics, 6: 419443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L.Marks, G. (2007) (eds), ‘Sources of Euroskeptisicism’, Acta Politica, 42(2/3), special issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L.Marks, G.(2009), ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39(1): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L., Marks, G.Wilson, C.J. (2002), ‘Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration’, Comparative Political Studies, 35(8): 965989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, R.Sprague, J. (2000), ‘Political Consequences of Inconsistency: The Accessibility and Stability of Abortion Attitudes’, Political Psychology, 21(1): 5779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionescu, G. (1974), ‘Between Sovereignty and Integration: Introduction’, Government and Opposition, 9(1): 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, J.A., Banducci, S.A.Bowler, S.A. (2003), ‘To Know it is to Love it? Satisfaction with Democracy in the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies, 36: 271292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S.Frey, T. (2006), ‘Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared’, European Journal of Political Research, 45(6): 921956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S.Frey, T.(2008), West European Politics in the Age of Globalization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavine, H., Huff, J.W., Wagner, S.Sweeney, D. (1998), ‘The Moderating Influence of Attitude Strength on the Susceptibility to Context Effects in Attitude Surveys’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2): 359373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, L.Scheingold, S. (1970), Europe's Would-be Polity (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
Luskin, R.L. (1987), ‘Measuring Political Sophistication’, American Journal of Political Science, 31(4): 856899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, K.M.Pinney, N. (1990), ‘The Effects of General and Domain-Specific Expertise on Political Memory and Judgment’, Social Cognition, 8(1): 930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, L. (2002), ‘Public Support for European Integration: Cost/Benefit Analysis or Perceived Cultural Threat’, Journal of Politics, 64: 551566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowski, R.Tucker, J. (2010), ‘Euroscepticism and the Emergence of Political Parties in Poland’, Party Politics, 16(4): 533548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Nelson, M.Edwards, E. (2006), ‘Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality’, Comparative Political Studies, 39: 155175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrschneider, R.Whitefield, S. (2007), ‘Representation in New Democracies: Party Stances on European Integration in Post-Communist Eastern Europe’, Journal of Politics, 69: 11331146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, S.W. (1988), Reason, Ideology, and Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Sanchez-Cuenca, I. (2000), ‘The Political Basis of Support for European Integration’, European Union Politics, 1(2): 147171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbergen, M.R., Edwards, E.E.de Vries, C.E. (2007), ‘Who's Cueing Whom? Mass–Elite Linkages and the Future of European Integration’, European Union Politics, 8(1): 1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoeckel, F. (2013), ‘Ambivalent or Indifferent? Reconsidering the Structure of EU Public Opinion’, European Union Politics, 14(1): 2345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szczerbiak, A.Taggart, P. (2009), EU Enlargement and Referendums (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Tillman, E.R. (2004), ‘The European Union at the Ballot Box? European Integration and Voting Behavior in the New Member States’, Comparative Political Studies, 37(5): 590610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillman, E.R. (2012), ‘Support for the Euro, Political Knowledge, and Voting Behavior in the 2001 and 2005 UK General Election’, European Union Politics, 13: 367389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tverdova, Y.V.Anderson, C.J. (2004), ‘Choosing the West? Referendum Choices on EU Membership in East-Central Europe’, Electoral Studies, 23(2): 185208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tworzecki, H. (2003), Learning to Choose: Electoral Politics in East-Central Europe (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
de Vreese, C. (2003), Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration (Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers).Google Scholar
de Vries, C.E. (2007), ‘Sleeping Giant: Fact or Fairytale? How European Integration Affects Vote Choice in National Elections’, European Union Politics, 8(3): 363385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, C.E.Edwards, E.E. (2009), ‘Taking Europe to its Extremes: Extremist Parties and Public Euroskepticism’, Party Politics, 15(1): 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, C.E.van Kersbergen, K. (2007), ‘Interests, Identity and Political Allegiance in the European Union’, Acta Politica, 42(2/3): 307328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, C.E.Steenbergen, M.R. (2013), ‘Variable Opinions: The Predictability of Support for Unification in Mass European Publics’, Journal of Political Marketing, 12(1): 121141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, C.E., Edwards, E.E.Tillman, E.R. (2011), ‘Clarity of Responsibility beyond the Pocketbook: How Political Institutions Condition EU Issue Voting’, Comparative Political Studies, 44(3): 339363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, J. (1992), The Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, J.Feldman, S. (1992), ‘A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences’, American Journal of Political Science, 36(3): 579616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 22
Total number of PDF views: 299 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-6mlss Total loading time: 0.634 Render date: 2021-01-16T23:13:01.590Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Sat Jan 16 2021 22:53:17 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Ambivalent Europeans? Public Support for European Integration in East and West
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Ambivalent Europeans? Public Support for European Integration in East and West
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Ambivalent Europeans? Public Support for European Integration in East and West
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *